MULTIPARTY LITIGATION Flashcards
You can sue as co-plaintiffs when cases:
- Arise from the same transaction or occurrence (T/O)
- Raise at least one common question
The case has been filed. Now the court might force some nonparty (“absentee”) to join in the case.
– Why would a court force a nonparty into the case?
Because the absentee is necessary or required
Who are Necessary and Indispensable Parties?
An absentee (A) who meets any of these tests:
- Without A, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties (worried about multiple suits); OR
- A’s interest may be harmed if he is not joined (practical harm); OR
- A claims an interest that subjects a party (usually D) to a risk of multiple obligations.
are joint tortfeasors necessary?
Never
How can an absentee be joined?
First make sure he is necessary
NOW see if your joinder is “feasible.” It is feasible if:
- there is PJ over you and
- joining you will not goof up diversity jurisdiction (the court determines whether you would come in as a P or a D to see if bringing you in will goof up diversity).
If the joinder is feasible, The court orders the absentees joinder
What happens if you (A) cannot be joined (e.g., no PJ over you)?
The court must do one of two things:
- Proceed without the absentee or
- dismiss the entire case
When the absentee cannot be joined, and the court must make the decision whether to a) Proceed without the absentee or b) dismiss the entire case, How does the court make that decision?
It looks at these factors:
- Is there an alternative forum available? (maybe some state court);
- What is the actual likelihood of harm to you?
- Can the court shape relief to avoid that harm to you?
What happens if the court decides to dismiss rather than to proceed without the absentee?
Then we call the absentee indispensable
What’s an impleader?
There, D is bringing in someone new. The new party
is the third-party defendant (TPD).
If you have an impleader claim, must you assert it in this case?
No - its not compulsary
What circumstances bring about impleader? When can we use it? Why do we?
- D can only do this only to shift the liability that he owes to P. In other words, if D is found liable to P, he will try to get 3rd Party D (TPD) to pay all or part of his own liability.
- So an impleader claim is usually for indemnity (TPD has to cover the full claim) or contribution (TPD has to cover a pro-rata portion of the claim).
Steps for impleading the TPD in the pending case:
a. D files a third-party complaint naming the TPD; and
b. Serve process on the TPD. (So must have PJ over TPD.)
Timing for Impeader
There is a right to implead within 14 days of serving your answer.
After that, you need court permission.
After TPD is joined, may plaintiff assert a claim against TPD?
Yes, if the claim arises from the same T/O as the underlying case.
After TPD is joined, may TPD assert a claim against plaintiff?
Yes if the claim arises from the same T/O as the underlying case.
Subject Matter Jurisdiction & Impleader
Remember to assess each claim separately for subject
matter jurisdiction. Try diversity and federal question. If neither works, try supplemental jurisdiction.
There does not need to be diversity between the 3rd party D and the P, but there does between both of the Ds.
What is Intervention?
Here, the nonparty brings herself into the case. She chooses to come in either as P (to assert a claim) or as D (to defend a claim).
The court may realign her if it thinks she came in on the “wrong” side.
Application to intervene must be “timely.”
What are the types of Intervention?
- Intervention of right
- Permissive intervention
Intervention of Right
Intervention of Right occurs when you would be a necessary. Same rules. Thus if you are necessary, you may intervene
Permissive intervention
A’s claim or defense and the pending case have at
least one common question.
Discretionary with court.
Usually OK unless intervention will cause delay or prejudice to someone.
Intervention and SMJ
Assess claim by/against the intervenor for subject matter jurisdiction (diversity or FQ. If neither applies, then try supplemental).
Class Action
Representative(s) (“Rep”) sues on behalf of group.
Initial Requirements for Class Action and what about them
Must demonstrate all four of these:
- Numerosity
- Too many class members for practicable joinder - no magic #
- Commonality
- There is some issue in common to all class members, so resolution of that issue will generate answers for everybody in one stroke.
- Typicality; and
- Rep’s claims are typical of those of the class
- Representative adequate
- The class representative will fairly and adequately represent class.
What are the next steps for class action ones the initial requirements are met?
Must fit the case within one of three types:
- TYPE 1: “Prejudice”: class treatment necessary to avoid harm (prejudice) either to class members or to the non-class party.
- TYPE 2: Class seeks an injunction or declaratory judgment because D treated the class alike.
- example: Employment Discrimination
- Cannot recover damages
- TYPE 3: “Damages”: (Example: Mass Tort)
- common questions predominate over individual questions; AND
- class action is the superior method to handle the dispute.
