Multimodal Brain Imaging Flashcards
what is Single Neuron Activity and Local Field Potential?
single -cell and ( Local Field Potential 140-100,00 neurons - so slightly better spatial resolution EEG)
so AP and PSP
for a Continuous Signal the sampling freq is?
(sampling frequency > 8 kHz)
settings for single cell?
- High pass filter (> 300 Hz)
* Spike sorting
details for LFP
Local Field Potential • Down-sampling (not necessary for lower sampling frequency) • Spike correction (local interpolation around each spike) • Low pass filter (< 200 Hz)
what was first finding in slides using these methods?
Neuronal Spikes Phase Locked to LFP
one neuron fired more at theta peaks and not troughs
one neuron fired more at theta troughs and not peaks
= phase preference
also - different neurons show diff preferences but all like theta
- Neurons also exhibited phase-locked to oscillations in frequencies other than theta, like delta (1-4 Hz), alpha (10-16 Hz), beta (16-30 Hz), and gamma (30-90 Hz) frequency ranges
- Some neurons show phase locking to multiple oscillations
what does this give us
more potential for coding information - like a large number of words in vocabulary
- Neuronal phase-locking phenomenon is present in various brain regions
- Gamma oscillations facilitate a different type of information coding compared with delta or theta oscillations
• Delta and Theta oscillations may facilitate phase-based temporal coding
– Phase Coding Hypothesis: Neurons encode information via the oscillatory phase at which they spike
> Different neurons fire at different phases of ongoing oscillations
when combing EEG and fMRI, the one issue is
different time scales (BOLD is sluggish)
3 different approaches to combined EEG and fMRI?
1) Separate EEG and fMRI - and subsequent combination
2) Simultaneous - recordings and analysis of high amplitude EEG signals (e.g. alpha oscillations)
3) Simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings and analysis of ERP and single trials
Separate EEG-fMRI Advantage?
Better quality of signals because lesser artifacts
associated paper for separate?
Heinze et al (1994) - pet n EEG / auditory visual spatial attention + source localisation
Separate EEG-fMRI: Drawbacks ?
• Implicit assumption: Both measures pick up similar neural activity
– Not all activity in EEG result in BOLD responses and vice versa
- Data cannot be combined to investigate emergent brain responses which may not be time-locked to stimulus
- Significant subjective and experimental differences between the two recording sessions
• Other differences – Order effects
– Posture (EEG seated / fmri supine)
– Environmental noise – Level of comfort
Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Acquisition: the EEG is …
High amplitude EEG Signals
High amplitude EEG visible to the naked eye – Alphaoscillations
– Epilepticspikes
– SSVEP(steadystatevisualevokedpotential) At low MR field strengths (< 1.5 T)
associated Simultaneous paper =
Ives 1993
Ives 1993 found
Typical result:
– EEG Alpha power is negatively correlated with BOLD signalin occipital cortex and positively correlated with thalamic activity
Simultaneous needs
- Pre-amps inside MR magnet (reduction of cable length)
- Amps must be free of ferro-magentic materials
- Wider dynamic (range of input signal greater to get better recording - you dont want a saturated amplifier, gives no info) range to prevent amplitude saturation
What are the Two types of acquisition?
- Interleaved Acquisition
* Continuous Acquisition
in Interleaved Acquisition, EEG is acquired….
continuously
in Interleaved Acquisition, fMRI is acquired….
intermittently