MT2 Flashcards
what aspects of eyewitness testimony are important to consider?
- Can lead to mistaken identity
- Has led to hundred of wrongful convictions
- Implicated in 70% of cases that were exonerated with DNA evidence
why do we make errors as eyewitnesses?
- Memory is constructive
- Memory = what actually happens + person’s knowledge, experiences, and expectations
- Our memory is not a tape recorder we play back
- Our memories change: reproductions contain omissions (leaving things out) or commissions (adding new content)
pros and cons of constructive memory
Pros
- allows us to fill in the blanks
- Cognition is creative
- Understand language
- Solve problems
- Make decisions
Cons
- Memory errors
- False beliefs about others
- Susceptibility to misinformation
schema
knowledge about some aspect of the environment
script
conception of a sequence of actions that usually occurs during a particular experience
error type 1
source monitoring error
- Source memory: determine origins of our memories
- Sour monitoring error: misidentifying source of a given memory
- Happens to professors often
- Did I mention this in this section or the other one?
error type 2
errors due to attention
- Specific stimuli can narrow attention
- Weapon focus
- This leads to better memory for central elements at expense of everything else
- Would be difficult to recall what was periphery if we didn’t attend to it
- One extreme form: crime blindness
errors type 3
errors due to suggestion
- Confirming feedback
- Can be severe/ unethical and lead to confession of crime one didn’t commit
- In some cases, police presented those accused with false evidence
- Can happen in therapeutic contexts as well
Becoming famous overnight study (type 1)
participants read non-famous names
- Immediate test group: read non famous names from encoding, new non famous names, and new famous names —> asked which are famous?
- Result: most non famous names correctly labelled as non famous (not that interesting)
- Delayed test group (24 hrs): read non famous names from encoding, new non famous names, and non famous names —> asked which are famous?
- Result: some non famous names incorrectly labelled as famous
- Why does this happen? Some non famous names were familiar and participants misattributed source of familiarity. Failed to identify source as list that had been read previous day
Misinformation effect
Misleading info presented after someone witnesses an event can alter how the person later remember the event
- Groups that were introduced a smash sound reported faster speed and presence of broken glass
- People of all ages are prone to misinformation effect but some data suggests its stronger in children and older adults
test question: You are a juror on a murder case. An eyewitness takes the stand and reports their account of the crime.
How does your knowledge of memory and memory errors affect your use of the eyewitness testimony?
An eyewitness may appear very confident, but confidence is not always a reliable indicator of truth.
- Memory = what actually happens + person’s knowledge, experiences, and expectations
- Our memory is not a tape recorder we play back
- Our memories change: reproductions contain omissions (leaving things out) or commissions (adding new content)
should we trust eye witnesses?
- It depends
- So many factors affect memory and we must wrestle with this balancing act
- Central vs. Peripheral
- Familiar vs. Novel
future thinking
refers to ability to imagine events in future
- can be semantic or episodic
- i know i want to live near the beach in 10 years (semantic)
- i can imagine living on the beach in 10 years, feeling sand between my toes (episodic)
tulving and amnesic patient K.C
- motorcycle accident at age 30
- damage to hippocampus and other regions
- severly amnesic
- K.C couldn’t think about his future, could not remember past events
MTL damage reading (Race and Keane)
- MTL is critical for constructing event simulations when descriptive elements aren’t readily available, and suggest that the MTL may be particularly important for constructing future even representations that are both detailed and specific
neuroimaging between past and future events
Brain regions that activate in remembering past events and future events are super similar!
Greater lifetime GPS use was associated with…
poorer spatial navigation and memory in the lab
Daily diary study
days when participants reporter higher use of social media, they also reported more memory failures
chronic media multitasking effects
students who ranged in greater media multitasking often did more poorly on quizzes and tests
- Other work suggests more chronic media multitasking is associated with poorer performances
reviewing photos and memory
Reviewing photos from events increases memory for those events
- But memory for non-reviewed events that occurred around that time can be reduced
reviewing videos and memory
Events replayed with hippo camera were remembered better, Lasted over 3 months, and evoked more positive emotions during recall
- Hippo camera replayed led to sharpened hippocampal activity (reduced overlap between memories)
taking photos and memory
Some studies suggest photo taking impairs later memory
- Effect shown even if participants are told photos are deleted, suggesting its not due to cognitive offloading, that is relying on external devices instead of one’s own cognition
- Could be due to distraction of photo taking, reducing encoding
- but… other studies show benefits of photo taking if participant is allowed to choose what they photograph, zoom in, etc
sharing photos and memory
Sharing memories on social media can enhance memory for that content
- However, its possible that the act of sharing some events harms out memory for non-shared and related events — retrieval induced forgetting
- you review all photos to select the best on, you also re-review when you get notification
domain general vs. specific
- Domain general: when technology influences cognition in general
- Domain specific: when technology influences cognition on technology relevant task
To date theres evidence in support of domain specific and domain general affects, BUT theres less evidence in support of domain general effects