MT1 - Theories Flashcards
Functionalism - Parsons
Organic analogy and Social change
Organic analogy:
To Functionalists, society is like the human body. There are three similarities:
Both the society and human body are systems of interrelated, interdependent parts that fit together
Both have needs. If these are not met, both the body and the society will die
Both depend on the functions performed by their different parts
Social change:
A traditional society changes to modern through a gradual, evolutionary process whereby if there’s a change in one system all the others will change too
CRITICISM OF FUNCTIONALISM:
Deterministic. Ignores the influence of free will and individual choice
Marxism - (3 class societies why w/c put up with unjust system)
Ancient society: Based on the exploitation of slaves. Feudal society: Based on the exploitation of serfs (peasants). Capitalist society: Based on the exploitation of workers.
Working class put up with the unjust system because the ruling class ideology created and maintained false class consciousness
CRITICISMS OF MARXISM:
Overemphasised the importance of class and ignored other forms of inequality such as gender
Neo-Marxism - Gramsci (2 ways r/c maintain control over society)
Coercion: The use of force through the army, police, prisons to force the working class to accept the ruling class domination.
Hegemony: The rule through consent, the use of ideas and values to persuade the working class to accept the ruling class domination.
CRITICISMS OF GRAMSCI:
Over-emphasises the role of ideas and under-emphasises the role of the state and the use of coercion.
Structuralist Marxism - Althusser (2 means the state performs political and ideological functions through)
Repressive state apparatus – the army, police, courts, etc. They coerce the working class to accept the unjust system.
Ideological state apparatus - the media, religion, education. etc. These ideologically manipulate the working class into accepting the ruling class domination.
Althusser argues that free will is not real; it is a product of the ruling class ideology and a part of the myth of meritocracy.
CRITICISMS OF ALTHUSSER:
Over-emphasises the influence of social structure in guiding human behaviour and ignores the influence of free will
Radical Feminism
Claim that patriarchy is universal – male domination of women exists in all societies. It is the main form of inequality and conflict. All men oppress all women. Therefore, men are the enemy!
Rad Fems argue that patriarchy constructs sexuality in order to satisfy men’s desires. This objectifies women into sex objects.
CRITICISMS OF RAD FEM:
Ignore violence by women against men and within lesbian relationships.
Marxist Feminism
Women’s oppression is rooted in capitalism. Women’s oppression results from their primary role as unpaid homemakers. Through this role, women perform a number of vital functions for capitalism:
Women reproduce the future labour force – by nurturing and socialising the future labour force as well as servicing the current labour force (their husbands).
CRITICISMS OF MARX FEM:
Fail to explain the subordination of women in non- capitalist societies.
Social action theories - Weber (Social Action theory)
A full Sociological explanation of human behaviour therefore involves:
The level of cause – we need to explain the structural factors that shape people’s behaviour.
The level of meaning – we need to understand the subjective meanings that individuals attach to their actions
CRITICISMS OF SOCIAL ACTION:
Weber’s view of human actions is too individualistic; it fails to explain the shared nature of meanings.
Symbolic Interactionism - Mead
Our behaviour is influenced by the meanings we give to the things that are significant to us.
Mead’s theory explains that social order is maintained because individuals have an internalised representation of the point of view of others.