mt-DNA in other organisms, paternal outcome, fertility Flashcards

1
Q

what is neurospora Crassa?

A

train of mould, where some was seen to be slower at growing, identified to be a result of an mtDNA mutation, called poky

This mould as A and a mating types, either of which can be maternal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what experiment was done in neurospora Crassa

A

Communicated by G. W. Beadle, March 3, 1952

Investigated inheritance of the mt-mutation poky by performing reciprocal crosses, comparing offspring from maternal WT + paternal poky, vs maternal poky and paternal WT
Also added a nuclear mutation for comparison

Results -

Mendelian inheritance of nuclear mutant, 50/50 in both scenarios

Offspring all matched maternal phenotype, suggesting maternal inheritance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are petites in yeast?

A

mtDNA mutations/mutations affecting mitochondrial function identified as ‘petites’ (small colonies due to insufficient respiration - defective e- transport chain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

explain what is meant by segregational vs neutral vs supressive petites?

A

when crossing a haploid ‘petite’ and a normal haploid in yeast, three outcomes were observed -

segregational -
50/50 petites vs WT, i.e. showed mendelian inheritance, meaning petites can arise from nuclear mutations (we know this idea)

neutral - all normal progeny regardless of which parent cell was mutant -
In yeast inheritance of mtDNA isn’t uniparental, the yeast fuse, the diploid has both mutant and WT genomes for about 20 divisions after which one is selected/reverts to homoplasmy (and in this case WT was selected)

suppressive -
all progeny were petites, meaning mutations can behave dominantly. yeast selected the mutant mt-DNA when reverting to homoplasmy. could be preferentially replicated e.g. the mutant genome is shorter so quicker to replicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why are yeast useful for mitochondrial disease research?

A

Mitochondrial functions are highly conserved between humans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Possible to undertake large scale screens; genetic manipulations are easy; biochemical analyses well established

Yeast can survive on fermentable carbon sources in the absence of mitochondrial function

Growth phenotype simple to assess; use a non-fermentable carbon source e.g. glycerol/ethanol/lactate (only ones with function ETC can survive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Crossed two different strains of yeast, S. cerevisiae and S. uvarum, what did they look at and conclude?

A

Compared the ones that selected Su mt-DNA (blues) when reverting to homoplasmy, vs Sc mt-DNA

So they were looking at yeast with the same nuclear background (all had a mix of the two nuclear genomes) but two different mt-genomes (because one or the other is selected)

Conclusions -
Provided evidence for the idea that the ‘nuclear context’ is important - i.e. the compatibility between the nuclear products in the mitochondria and the mt-genome products. You can see the Su mt-DNA yeast grew a bit slower in both experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

De Luca et al., 2009

showed the importance of nuclear context, how?

A

Influence of four different nuclear contexts (idk different alleles for genes involved in mt-function) on the growth phenotype of the mt-DNA LeuA30(29)G mutation (equivalent to human mitochondrial tRNA mutations that result in MELAS)

using serial dilutions for easier viewing, saw differences in growth for the same mt-DNA mutation in the different nuclear contexts

Concluded different nuclear contexts resulted in differences in growth for the same mt-DNA mutation

***Therefore - Secondary nuclear mutations can have an impact on phenotype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

name the three things that happen to paternal mtDNA (explain the easy one)

A

dilution - Oocyte: 150,000-200,000 copies mtDNA
Sperm: as little as ~10 copies mtDNA

Reduction of copy number in sperm maturation

Destruction of paternal mt-DNA post fertilisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

give examples/evidence/explanation of the idea of reduction in mt-DNA copy number in sperm maturation

A

Rantanen et al., 2001

Sperm production occurs in seminiferous tubules, with immature sperm at the edge and mature moving into the centre

Visualisation of mtDNA and RNA and TFAM showed much more at edges - in immature sperm/spermatogonia - than centre in mature sperm, indicating a decline in mtDNA copy number

Also - western blot for TFAM across the body (in rats) showed testes lower levels than the heart, liver, kidneys
AND that TFAM levels declined with age - through puberty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

give examples/evidence/explanation destruction of paternal mt-DNA post fertilisation

what was an interesting observation across all the experiments?

A

Ubiquitin tags on paternal mt-DNA followed by degradation has been shown in cows and humans (Sutovsky et al., 1999)

Paternal mtDNA destroyed by autophagy in C. elegans (Sato and Sato, 2011; Zhou et al., 2016), Drosophila (Politi et al., 2014) and mouse (Rojansky et al., 2016)

^^ the mechanisms in the different species are all slightly different, indicating the concept of destroying paternal mt-DNA is important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

give four sources of heteroplasmy

A

age-related mutations

inheritance of a germline mutation

paternal mtDNA leakage (doesn’t get destroyed)

introduction of foreign mitochondria to reconstructed embryos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

with all those sources of heteroplasmy, there must be mechanisms to reduce it/control it.

what are the three main ideas here?

A

Passive reduction -
The most basic idea, basically that there isn’t any ‘mechanism’ per say, but that the massive reduction in mt-DNA between the parent as a whole, to the oocyte, + random segregation acting during the process of those oocyte’s production

Segregation of nucleoids -
The idea that the unit in which the mt-genomes are separated are in clusters of homoplasmic nucleoids

Focal replication of mt-DNA -
Some people think it’s not enough to explain the observed differences between offspring and mother, and that some mt-genomes must be amplified/selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the mt-bottleneck?

A

The fertilised oocyte undergoes loads of divisions, making loads of cells, some of which are primordial germ cells (females born with all their eggs etc…)
This transition has a huge reduction in cell size and therefore mtDNA number, ***especially considering mt-DNA is not replicated for the earlier stages of embryogenesis

(then huge increase in copy number)
From puberty, the oocytes continue maturation; this involves a huge increase in size and an amplification of mt-DNA copy number. This is where the preferential replication idea would occur, dictating the mt-DNA makeup of the oocyte and offspring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Wai et al., 2008 on preferential replication?

A

The paper (Wai et al., 2008) argues we see this selective amplification of mitochondrial DNA at this point (egg maturation in puberty with the massive inc. in mt-DNA copy number) and ***therefore a big increase in heteroplasmy or gene variants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did Wai et al., 2008 paper show/do and what did they conclude? (selective amplification etc…)

A

visualised newly replicated mt-DNA in green

TFAM in red

Overlay and if they match up perfectly you get yellow = where both TFAM and replicated mtDNA are

The yellow dots are a subset of the red dots, so only some of the mtDNA present are being actively replicated

Wai’s Conclusion:
Selective amplification of certain mtDNAs occurs during oocyte maturation.
This means that heteroplasmy levels can change dramatically between generations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

aside from Wai et al., 2008 is there any other evidence for selective amplification?

A

Multiple sources of experimental evidence that show positive selection of beneficial mtDNA variants over mutants and also purifying selection to remove deleterious mutations

not quite relevant but - plenty of evidence to show lack of mtDNA replication during early embryogenesis

17
Q

assisted reproductive technologies

‘three parent babies’

explain how spindle transfer works

A

Taking the patient’s metaphase 2 spindle, so the chromosomes are attached, and place it in a healthy donor’s egg (from which their spindle and attached chromosomes have been removed)

Add the sperm for fertilisation

The cleaving embryo with normal donor mitochondria but both the parents chromosomes can be transferred to the uterus

18
Q

three parent babies -

explain pro-nuclear transfer

A

You fertilise both the donor’s egg and the patient’s egg with the partner’s sperm

Gets to the point where the sperm and egg nuclei begin to fuse - forming pronucleus

It’s this pronucleus you remove, placing the patient’s into the donor egg instead

19
Q

what are the concerns with three parent babies?

A

Transfer of patient mitochondria along with the spindle - the mitochondria do cluster around the metaphase II spindle prior to fertilisation, so this is defo possible, potentially likely

Bottleneck = large changes in heteroplasmy are possible over a few generations, so the mt-DNA mutations could be seen again when not expected

Preferential replication could occur for the patient’s mutated mt-DNA (if some got in) e.g. if it’s more compatible with the nuclear DNA (As they are a match) who knows?

Some voices in the field believe we don’t know enough for the legislation to have been passed (tho it has)

20
Q

lecture 3 - read paper from Dr Jones

A