MPT General Strategies Flashcards
What are the types of writing assignments that show up on the MPT?
1- Persuasive Brief 2- Objective Memo 3- Letter to Opposing Counsel or Client 4- Opinion Letter 5- Closing Argument 6- Interrogatories 7- Will 8- Cause of Action - Complaint filed in court 9- Contract
Legal Memorandum structure on the MPT normally has:
Three main parts.
1- Introduction
2- Discussion
3- Conclusion
Legal Brief structure on the MPT normally has:
Three main parts.
1- Issues or Summary
2- Argument
3- Conclusion
At least on the MPT, the Discussion part of a memo or the Argument part of a brief usually has:
Three parts of its own as well.
MPT Exam structure should include:
The grader must be able to see the divisions of your work product just by glancing at the pages. You should use the following:
1- Section Headings,
2- Spaces Between Sections, numbers and letters to indicate the parts of your work product.
Office Memorandum “INTRODUCTION” Section should be set up and include the following
1- Introduction Heading, which is centered in the middle of the page.
2- Write two or three sentences, setting out the partner’s task assignment, and
3- Briefly stating what you have accomplished and your conclusions
Office Memorandum “DISCUSSION” Section should be set up and include the following
1- Discussion Heading, which is centered in the middle of the page.
2-Divide the “discussion” section into two or three sections, following the directions in the task memo.
3- Each “section of the discussion section” will have a powerful “topic heading that uses both law and facts.
The topic heading in the discussion sentence is a mini-IRAC / law to fact sentence, e.g., “because defendant claimed that his product that was actually made of colored water would cure acne
Office Memorandum “CONCLUSION” Section should be set up and include the following
1- Conclusion Heading, which is centered in the middle of the page.
2- The Conclusion part of the memorandum summarizes what the task was and what the writer has accomplished. It presents the writer’s conclusion
Office Memorandum Structure starting at the top of the page, needs to include the following:
1- Law office Name, and address 2- The word "MEMORANDUM" centered 3- To: 4- From: 5- Subject Matter: 6- Date: 7- First heading centered "Introduction" 8- Second heading centered "Discussion" 9- Third heading centered "Conclusion"
An Objective Office Memorandum
Considers both sides of the issue/question.
Thus, an objective memorandum will normally consider both sides of the question and take an on-the-one-hand / on-the-other-hand approach.
On the MPT, every time the Partner memo asks the bar candidate for a memorandum for the partner:
The request is for an “office memorandum”. The MPT Partner Memo will indicate whether the MPT memorandum should be objective or persuasive.
What is the language in the Partner Memorandum that indicates the bar candidate has to write an “Objective Office Memorandum?”
1- Every time the partner asks for information, or for considerations on both sides of the question,
2- The Partner memorandum will usually tell the bar candidate to “evaluate” or to “discuss” or to “analyze” the client’s case.
Example: Write an objective memorandum analyzing whether or not the law applies to our client’s case
What is the language in the Partner Memorandum that indicates the bar candidate has to write an “Persuasive Office Memorandum?”
The partner will ask for “arguments on one side” of the issue
To make sure the grader understands that the bar candidate grasped what kind of Office Memorandum” they have to write the Introduction should include the following language:
1- The first sentence of the introduction states the following word for word: “You have asked me to write an objective memorandum” or “You have asked me to write a persuasive memorandum.”
What is the language in the Partner Memorandum that indicates the bar candidate has to write an “Persuasive Office Memorandum?”
Where the Partner Memo tells the bar candidate to “present arguments,” rather than just information, the partner is asking you to write a persuasive office memorandum.
Example: the MPT Partner Memo may tell you to write a memorandum for the partner that presents the best arguments in favor of the client’s case.
What is required of the bar candidate when it has been determined that MPT Partner Memorandum’s request is persuasive memo?
The candidate must “argue ONLY one side of the case.”
Every MPT Office Memorandum Must Display?
Its own structure visually, and must always look professional
On the Bar Exam, the MPT’s task is to show that
The Bar candidate can follow instructions in the task memo, but also demonstrate the skills of a first-year lawyer while making the fact of following those instructions so visually obvious that the grader knows just by flipping the pages that the bar candidate has followed instructions.
On the MPT, if the partner tells the bar candidate to write a memorandum with three sections,
1- That means the “Discussion” part of the MPT work product will have three sections that are both intellectually and visually entirely separate from each other.
2- The three separate sections will be clearly distinct on the page. Each section will have its own persuasive heading, which is underlined, and each section will have a number at the start: Section 1, Section 2, Section 3.
In order to display the structure of the MPT work product, the careful bar candidate will always
Number and Letter the parts of the work product, leaving abundant white space in between sections
In the Introduction to the memorandum, on the MPT, the first and second sentence of a law office memo
Summarizes the problem to be solved and briefly suggests how the writer / bar candidate has resolved it.
Ex. “You have asked me to evaluate whether our client” has a cause of action in negligence. “I have “concluded that” he probably does/does not, “but further research is necessary.”
In the Discussion section of the memo, the structure of paragraphs are
Aspects of the problem one after another, in turn, in separate paragraphs
In the Conclusion section of the MPT Partner memo, the first and second sentences
1- States the problem, and based on the factors considered in the Discussion, states how the writer comes out.
Example: “Having evaluated all of the facts in the file and the applicable law, I have concluded that our client may have a cause of action in negligence, and I have suggested further avenues for research
The MPT Office Memo begins and ends with
A “summary paragraph,” which are pretty much the same in the Introduction at the beginning and the Conclusion at the end.
The Discussion Section of the memorandum sets out …
The arguments from law and fact that lead the writer to the Conclusion. So the entire memorandum has three parts.
The MPT packet will normally contain one or more documents that help … ?
The bar candidate to organize the work product or that provide models to follow
In deciding how to organize the Discussion section, the bar candidate will usually choose from among the following methods of organization:
1- Order according to the conventions of the legal analysis, e.g., statutory analysis
2- If the Partner Memorandum stipulates an order, use the order stipulated
3- If an Office Memorandum in the File stipulates and order, use that order
4- If another document in the File requiring a response provides an order, you have the option of following that order.
5- Use the order in the applicable statute or case law
6- Use logical order: threshold issues first; dispositive issues before other issues; more important issues before less important issues; alternative analyses last.
If the MPT Partner Memorandum Discussion section is a task that requires “statutory analysis,” then the memorandum will follow what structure or order?
The “order according to the conventions of the legal analysis, e.g., statutory analysis. The discussion will be broken down to three parts. First paragraph, the writer will take each part of the statute in turn, employ interpretations suggested by applicable cases. The second paragraph will use external materials where necessary and permitted. The third and final paragraph will apply the statute to the facts of the case.
Example of the “statutory analysis” instruction from the Partner memo – “Please draft an objective memorandum for me analyzing whether we can use the “Act / Statute/ Code or Proposed Code” to move to quash the subpoena
C”RE”AC use only the “RE” in one sentence formats in the Statutory Analysis Discussion section
If the Partner Memo stipulates an order on how the questions are presented, or in what order to respond
Then use the order stipulated in answer the questions in the same order that the Partner Memo requested. (e.g., instruct the bar candidate to discuss two questions, one of which involves two sub-questions.
The bar candidate must follow the structure the task memo dictates. Example, first analyze the legal and factual bases of the claims. Second, for each of the four defenses, identify … etc.
If an Office Memorandum in the File stipulates an order
use that order. The Partner Memo may tell the bar candidate to organize the memorandum in accordance with the instructions in an Officer Memorandum in the File. That second document will tell the bar candidate how to organize the work product.
If another document in the File requiring response provides and order
you have the option of using that order
If the MPT applies applicable statute or case law provide a list of options
it usually makes sense to evaluate the options in the order given. The instructions in the Partner Memo may, for example, tell the bar candidate to evaluate the client’s options in light of a customer’s allegations. For example, under UCC 2-610(a), (b), (c), the bar candidate would normally evaluate the client’s options in the order of the subsections of 2-610
Using logical order means that
the bar candidate use threshold or dispositive issues first; or most important issues first, suggesting a conclusion for each question.
Sample Instructions for Objective Office Memorandum
1- Please draft an objective memorandum for me analyzing whether we can …. Be sure to address both sides of the issue; that is, discuss any facts or law that may prevent …
2- To help me advise [our client], please review his proposed waiver and prepare a memorandum:
a. analyzing whether .... b. suggesting specific revisions to .... c. discuss whether any .....
- Please prepare a memorandum evaluating the merits of [ Y’s ] argument for [ X ], bringing to bear the applicable legal authorities and the relevant facts as described by the client
- Please prepare a memorandum in which you evaluate the …. Identify the legal issues that can give rise to constitutional challenges to each of the provisions and analyze whether each such provision is likely to be found legally permissible.
Instructions for a Persuasive Office Memorandum on the MPT
1- Please prepare a memorandum for me that: States the “best case for why,” in light of the absence of [ X ]; and Discuss whether each provision of [ Y ] of the can survive or fail [ Z ]
Most MPT questions are either
Persuasive or Objective, but not both
The Most Common MPT Memorandum Format Top Heading
Law Firm Name
Attorneys at Law
Address
Address
MEMORANDUM (at the top of the memo put in all capital letters, centered, printed and underlined middle of page underlined)
The Most Common MPT Memorandum Format after the Top Heading
Flush with the lefthand margin list the following:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION ( put in all capital letters, centered, printed and underlined middle of page underlined)
The Most Common MPT Memorandum Format for the structure of paragraphs
INTRODUCTION
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION (put in all capital letters, centered, printed and underlined middle of page underlined)
The MPT allows bar candidates an extremely short time for researching and writing a memorandum, only ninety minutes. According, the MPT uses an abbreviated format, therefore, the MPT does not usually ask the bar candidate to included, in other words, the MPT allows the candidate to leave out:
1- A statement of facts,
2- To frame issues,
3- or to write brief answers.
Therefore, the memo only needs to include an INTRODUCTION, DISCUSSION, and CONCLUSION
In one MPT case, the partner memo asks for a “two-part” memorandum, which means that
The DISCUSSION section will have two parts, the partner memo specifies what those two parts are.
However, a three part memorandum is more common
Some MPT point sheets indicate that the grading of a memo on the MPT stresses persuasive writing and correct format:
a. powerful topic headings, underline your topic headings
b. persuasive writing,
c. argument from supportive law,
d. distinction of–or attack against–unfavorable law,
e. skillful use of the facts, and
f. careful use of the memo format
Powerful topic headings are key, and requires you to divid your discussion into:
Legal questions and to give the applicable law before applying the law to the facts
Using the “Perform Your Best” techniques in drafting an MPT memo, the First step is to:
Leave the first page or the first two pages of your bluebook blank. Starting on the second page, you will write the Discussion first.
Using the “Perform Your Best” techniques in drafting an MPT memo, the Second step is to:
is the Conclusion, forcefully summarizing your arguments in one or two sentences.
Using the “Perform Your Best” techniques in drafting an MPT memo, the Final step is to:
Finally, you will go back to the first page of your blue book and add the opening part of your Memorandum format, including the Introduction. Thus the last thing you will write in the Introduction for the MPT memo.
The reasoning for this process is that when you start to write the memo, you do not fully understand the project well enough to write a good introduction
The CONCLUSION on the MPT is limited too
One, maybe two sentences at most
This format summary reflects one of the MPT’s most common formats for Briefs and Memoranda for the Court:
This MPT format contains the basic components, but it has fewer parts than the formats set out in the rules of the courts where you will practice
Top: Name of the Court
Second line: Name of the Case (include both parties)
ABC [Plaintiff’s Name] )
Plaintiff )
) Case Number
v. ) Memorandum in
) Support of [ X ]
DEF [Defendant’s Name] )
Defendant )
)
______________________ )
STATEMENT OF FACTS ARGUMENT CONCLUSION
The format for briefs or persuasive memoranda on the MPT will be simpler, and the simplest MPT brief has these parts:
1- Statement of Facts, with or without statement of jurisdictional basis
2- Argument with persuasive headings
3- Conclusion
What is the alternative structure that the MPT may ask for an appellate brief:
1- Statement of the Case 2- Statement of Facts 3- Questions Presented 4- Argument 5- Conclusion
On the MPT the terms “brief” and “memorandum in support of a motion” and “memorandum of points and authorities”
Are largely interchangeable.
Either a Brief or a Persuasive Memorandum for the Court argues
ONLY one side of the case, and there is a fundamental difference for briefs and memoranda prepared for the court, rather than a partner. These documents always argue only one side of the case, they use a brief format
Every Work Product Must Present Its Structure both:
Visually and Clearly. Every work product is both visual and verbal. Because when the writing is is clear, it is to make your reader know you have followed the instructions
If the MPT Partner memo tells the candidate to write a brief with three sections;
You must not only think about the task as having three parts, you must also clearly number and label the sections of your memo, “1” and “2,” and “3,” leaving spaces between the sections, so that no bar exam grader could miss the fact that you have done “exactly” what the Partner Memo told you to do. The MPT is a visual exercise, not just an intellectual exercise
Parts of the Brief: How to Write the Statement of Facts on the MPT for a Persuasive Brief or Memo for the Court by:
Sometimes, however, the parties have entered into a Statement of Stipulated Facts. In such cases, the Partner Memorandum will tell you that the introductory section in the brief can be very short, and that you should “direct” the court’s attention to the Statement of Stipulated Facts in the case file. On the other hand, sometimes the partner memorandum will tell you to include a full Statement of Facts.
How to determine that the text of the Partner Memo is telling you to use a Stipulated Statement of Facts in your Brief
We have a statement stipulated facts in this case so, as pointed out in the brief writing guidelines, you should write only a short introductory statement ….
How to write a Full Statement of Facts
Strategies and Tactics: The wise bar candidate keeps a Statement of Facts as short as possible, typically One hand written page of a bluebook is usually enough.
The temptation is to let the hand start writing the facts, and then lose control of time. Instead, decide in advance how many lines long the Statement of Facts will be and stick with that decision.
Here is the trick. Before starting to write, mentally recite the facts to yourself in the shortest form possible. Make sure that your account omits needless words. Then just write down that shorten version of the facts.
Whenever you use the facts, whether in a Statement of Facts or in your Argument, your brief should emphasize
ONLY favorable facts but also include vital unfavorable facts. As the MPT materials often say, the facts must be stated accurately, but emphasis is not improper.
A Statement of Facts should NEVER contain or include
Either conclusions of law or arguments of law, just the facts in the case
What is the best format for writing the Statement of Facts or facts in the argument section
You put a favorable fact to your client first, then you put an unfavorable fact in the middle, and then a favorable fact to conclude. In part, you place the most favorable fact first
The paragraph of the Argument may be a summary that briefly sets out
The issues and tells what action the party wants the court to take. You state the legal questions, and how the court should come out
Why are headings in the brief key?
Because they display the architecture of counsel’s argument.
What should the headings in the brief contain?
The section headings in your brief should state the conclusion that you argue in that section, using both law and facts: “Defendant’s correspondence with Jones and the testimony of Smith show that defendant took active part in the conspiracy.”
How does the MPT grader quickly discover what your argument is?
By reading the argument headings. If the MPT file provides instructions for writing the argument section of a brief, it will invariably tell you to divide the argument into two or more parts, each with a strong, persuasive, heading
Typical MPT brief-writing instructions state that the argument heading
“Should succinctly summarize the reasons the tribunal should take the position you are advocating.”
The heading must, that is, contain both law and facts: “A heading should be a specific application of a rule of law to the facts of the case and not a bare legal or factual conclusion or a statement of an abstract principle.”
Examples of “improper” headings in the argument section, and “proper” headings
1- THE UNDERLYING FACTS ESTABLISH PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM OF RIGHT
1- BY PLACING A CHAIN ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY AND BY REFUSING ACCESS TO OTHER, PLAINTIFF HAS ESTABLISHED A CLAIM OF RIGHT
Strategies and Tactics: Clear argument headings
Clear argument headings using both law and facts are essential to getting a high grade on the MPT brief-writing task.
What is the approach to writing clear argument headings according to Perform Your Best
Here is the trick. Write the paragraphs of your arguments, first, leaving abundant white space above each argument, and then when you have finished the arguments, go back and insert the argument headings.
An MPT Office Memorandum with instructions for writing a brief usually tells the bar candidate to
“analyze applicable legal authority and persuasively argue how the facts and law support our client’s position.” This means stating the rule of law, with or without additional supporting rules. Next, applying the law to the facts. Finally, drawing a conclusion based on that law.
What is one way to master writing paragraphs that make a legal argument is to practice using what system?
Using the “Under-Here-Therefore” system of legal writing taught in Scoring High on Bar Exam Essays.
What is the logical format for the “Under-Here-Therefore” system
Under, NY Law, all men are created equal
Here, Socrates is a man
Therefore, Socrates is mortal
The argument heading should
succinctly summarize the reasons the tribunal should take the position you are advocating. It should be a “specific application of a rule of law to the facts of the case and not a bare legal or factual conclusion or a statement of an abstract principle.”
What is the logical format for the “Under-Here-Therefore” system
Under, NY Law, all men are created equal
Here, Socrates is a man
Therefore, Socrates is mortal
When the Partner Memo states that one of the tasks is to “be sure to refute the points made in the letter (brief, note, etc.) by opposing counsel, the instruction means that
You will write a section stating why the opposing counsel’s points are in error.
Where there are a number of points in issue, to take another principle of organization
the writer may begin with the threshold issues, then any dispositive issues, then other issues in the order of the client’s strongest arguments.