Mortgages Structure Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Mortgagee Powers Cases/ Statutes ?

A

Possession Action
Equity
—- Quennell v Maltby (Cannot take possession if in bad faith or improper use)

Statute

  • — Horsham v Clark (Dwelling house required to use A.J.A/ Mortgagee does not need to take possession to sell)
  • — Norgan (Reasonable time to pay back mortgage is the rest of the mortgage term)
  • — Bank of Scotland v Zinda (reasonable time is half the mortgage term)
  • — National Provincial Bank v Lloyd (Court may postpone possession up to a yr)
  • — Palk (Court can order sell under s.91(2))
  • — White v City London Brewery (Strict Accountability with possession)

Power of Sale
2 Precondition
—- Bailey v Barnes (purchaser has no duty to find out)

Duties

  • – China v South Sea Bank v Tan Soon Gin (Mortgagee chooses method of Sale)
  • –Silven Properties (M’gee does not have to wait for property price to rise)
  • — Cuckmire v Brick (M’gee has duty to take reasonable care in determining market price)
  • — Halifax v Corbett (M’gee cannot sell to himself)
  • — Tse Kwong Lamb (M’gee has onus of proof that sale was in good faith if sells to associated person/company)

After Sale
- s. 105

Mortgagor sells property
—- Krausz (Court can deny possession if M’gor can get better price)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mortgagor’s Rights/Protection?

A

Statutory Protection
Consumer Credit Act 1974 (only protects 2nd Mortgages)

s. 36 AJA 1970 & 1973 (M’gor must show ability to repay & future income)
- — Horsham v Clark (requires dwelling house & possession action)
- — Norgan (Reasonable time is to the end of the mortgage)

Challenging Interest Rates

  • — Paragon finance v Nash (Lord Dyson) (cannot dishonestly or arbitrarily set or vary interest rates)
  • — Dabrah (Unconscionable terms will be struck out)
  • — Multiservice Bookbinding v Marden (Parties of equal bargaining powers)

Equity of Redemption

  • — Right to Sell/ Second mortgage
  • —- Right to Redeem (Clogs)
  • —- Right to get property back in original State
  • Noakes v Rice (below)

Clogs
Term permitting purchase
—- Warborough v Garmite (valid if in different transaction)
—- Jones v Morgan (contradicts Reeve/ Invalid if 2 documents are interdependent)
—- Samuel v Jarrah (Lord Macnaughton/ issue of equal bargaining power)
—- Reeve v Lisle (valid if in different document)

term restricting redemption

  • — Fairclough v Swan Brewery (void because of length)
  • — Knightsbridge v Byrne (valid because of equal bargaining powers)

Collateral Advantage

  • — Noakes v Rice (property must be returned in original form)
  • — Bradley v Carritt (Collaterl advantage must end at the end of the mortgage)
  • — Kreglinger New Patagonia Meat (Solus tie may be valid after redemption if it is independent from mortgage)
  • — Biggs v Hoddinott (Agreement cannot be unconscionable/ Price must be fair)
  • — Esso v Marden (Restraint of Trade Doctrine)(Reasonableness and duration test) (longer tie requires stronger justification)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Equity of Redemption cases?

A

Equity of Redemption

  • Right to Sell/ Second mortgage
  • Right to Redeem (Clogs)
  • Right to get property back in original State
  • Noakes v Rice

Clogs
Term permitting purchase
—- Warborough v Garmite (valid if in different transaction)
—- Jones v Morgan (contradicts Reeve/ Invalid if 2 documents are interdependent)
—- Samuel v Jarrah (Lord Macnaughton/ issue of equal bargaining power)
—- Reeve v Lisle (valid if in different document)

term restricting redemption

  • — Fairclough v Swan Brewery (void because of length)
  • — Knightsbridge v Byrne (valid because of equal bargaining powers)

Collateral Advantage

  • — Noakes v Rice (property must be returned in original form)
  • — Bradley v Carritt (Collaterl advantage must end at the end of the mortgage)
  • — Kreglinger New Patagonia Meat (Solus tie may be valid after redemption if it is independent from mortgage)
  • — Biggs v Hoddinott (Agreement cannot be unconscionable/ Price must be fair)
  • — Esso v Marden (Restraint of Trade Doctrine)(Reasonableness and duration test) (longer tie requires stronger justification)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Statutory Protection of Mortgagor’s rights?

Challenging interest rates?

A

Statutory Protection
Consumer Credit Act 1974 (only protects 2nd Mortgages)

s. 36 AJA 1970 & 1973 (M’gor must show ability to repay & future income)
- — Horsham v Clark (requires dwelling house & possession action)
- — Norgan (Reasonable time is to the end of the mortgage)

Challenging Interest Rates

  • — Paragon finance v Nash (Lord Dyson) (cannot dishonestly or arbitrarily set or vary interest rates)
  • — Dabrah (Unconscionable terms will be struck out)
  • — Multiservice Bookbinding v Marden (Parties of equal bargaining powers)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Power of Sale cases?

A

Power of Sale
2 Precondition
—- Bailey v Barnes (purchaser has no duty to find out)

Duties

  • – China v South Sea Bank v Tan Soon Gin (Mortgagee chooses method of Sale)
  • –Silven Properties (M’gee does not have to wait for property price to rise)
  • — Cuckmire v Brick (M’gee has duty to take reasonable care in determining market price)
  • — Halifax v Corbett (M’gee cannot sell to himself)
  • — Tse Kwong Lamb (M’gee has onus of proof that sale was in good faith if sells to associated person/company)

After Sale
- s. 105

Mortgagor sells property
—- Krausz (Court can deny possession if M’gor can get better price)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mortgagor Protection against Possession?

A

Common Law

  • 28 Days to repay what is owed
  • —Birmingham v Caunt case
  • Must be reasonable prospect that M’gor can repay the whole debt in the period

Equity

  • May prevent possession unless it is being claimed in order to protect its security
  • — Quennell v Maltby (Cannot take possession if in bad faith or improper use)

Statute

  • AJA 1970 & 1973
  • — Horsham v Clark (Dwelling house required to use A.J.A/ Mortgagee does not need to take possession to sell)
  • — Norgan (Reasonable time to pay back mortgage is the rest of the mortgage term)
  • — Bank of Scotland v Zinda (reasonable time is half the mortgage term)

s. 91(2)
- –Palk (Court can order sell under s.91(2))

Strict Accountability
—- White v City London Brewery (Strict Accountability with possession)

Postpone possession in positive equity
—- National Provincial Bank v Lloyd (Court may postpone possession up to a yr)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly