Mortgages Flashcards

1
Q

Legal Mortgage: charge by way of legal mortgage

A

s. 23 LRA 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legal Mortgage must be created by deed

A

s. 52(1) LPA 1925

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Legal Mortgage must be registered against title of registered proprietor

A

ss. 25 & 27 LRA 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If there is delay to register a legal mortgage, it loses priority

A

Barclays Bank v Zaroovabli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Equitable mortgage created (1) by written agreement; (2) legal mortgage that does not comply with formalities (signed and witnessed per. s. 1 LP(MP)A 1989); (3) legal mortgage that is not registered.

A
  1. s. 2 LP(MP)A 1989
  2. s. 2 LP(MP)A 1989
  3. Leeds Permanent Building Society v Famini
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Equitable mortgage can arise from proprietary estoppel

A

Kinane v Alimany-Conteh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mortgagee is subject to general rules of priority per

A

s. 28 & 29 LRA 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mortgage can be overridden by an unregistered protected interest per

A

s. 29 LRA 2002 and Schedule 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example of equitable owner in actual occupation who overrode mortgage’s priority

A

Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mortgagor is only empowered to grant tenancies with permission of mortgagee

A

Dudley & District Benefit BS v Emerson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Acquisition Mortgages: no interest can arise before that of mortgagee

A

Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3rd party deemed to consent to right being subject to those of mortgagee when he knows purchase of property is made with aid of money borrowed from lender; court is generous in finding implied consent given by equitable owner to legal owner

A

Credit & Mercantile v Kaymuu

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Remedies of the Mortgagee can be used, simultaneously, sequentially or independently

A

Alliance and Leicester v Slayford

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Right to sue for debt

A

Alliance and Leicester v Slayford

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sue for debt: if sale of mortgaged property does not recover debt, the registered proprietor may be sued to recover difference

A

Rudge v Richens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

12 years to sue, years restart if mortgagor acknowledges debt

A

Bradford & Bingley v Rashid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Right to possession: can be done at any time

A

Rapaigealach v Barclays Bank

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Right to possession can be restricted by contract

A

Ashley Guarantee v Zacaria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Right to possession without court order can fall foul of criminal law

A

Criminal law Act 1977 or Protection from Eviction Act 1977

20
Q

Third party rights protected under s. 29 LRA and Schedule 3 may limit right to possession if have priority

A

Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland

21
Q

Mortgagee might limit or lose right through their own fault

A

Barclays Bank v O’Brien

22
Q

Court may refuse to grant possession if it sought to reasons unconnected to payment of debt

A

Quennel v Maltby (Court of Appeal - controversial); but can be proper purpose per Meretz Investments v ACP

23
Q

If dwelling house, act of repossession can be delayed at discretion of court if mortgagor likely to pay in reasonable time

A

s. 36 Administration of Justice Act 1970 (as amended by s. 8 AJA 1973)

24
Q

For delay of possession by court: (1) land must be dwelling house, as determined by state of premises when possession is sought, (2) sums must be due under mortgage, (3) mortgagor must be likely to pay in reasonable time (length of the mortgage); (4) can only be done if possession requested by court (otherwise no discretion); (5) request for delay not available to non mortgagee

A

(1) RBS v Miller
(3) Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan
(4) Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank
(5) Horsham Properties v Beech & Clark

25
Sale of land can be requested under s. 91 LPA 1925 by anyone with interest in property, defeating lender's right to possession.
Palk v Mortgage Services (but unclear how this fits with court's power to postpone possession if any sums due can be paid off Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Krausz
26
Mortgagee cannot gain possession of land mortgaged jointly when mortgagee only binds one person
Albany Home Loans Ltd v Massey
27
Mortgagee in possession is liable for any profits made from the land to mortgagor
White v City of London Brewery
28
Power of Sale (in every deed per s. 101(1) LPA 1925.
Twentieth Century Banking v Wilkinson
29
For Power of Sale to arise: (1) mortgage must have become due; (2) conditions under s. 103 LPA are met and (3) s. 104 protects purchaser
1. Twentienth Century Banking v Wilkinson; Payne v Cardiff RDC 2. s. 103 LPA 1925 3. s. 104 LPA 1925
30
Power of Sale: mortgagee had duty to attain reasonable price for the property
Cuckmere Brick v Mutual Finance
31
Power of Sale: Mortgagee has no duty to equitable owners with interest in the house
Parker and Tweedale v Dunbar Bank (No. 1)
32
Right to Appoint Receiver (implied per ss. 101 and 109 LPA in all mortgages.
Horsham Properties v Clark
33
Receiver owes equitable duty to mortgagor to manage property propertly
Medforth v Blake
34
Right to Foreclosure: refused and order of sale made
s. 91 LPA 1925. Only way for mortgagee to take ownership of the property
35
Remedies of Mortgagee must be used for proper purpose
Downsview v First City Corportation
36
Rights of Mortgagor: Equity of Redemption | "No clog or fetter"
Samuel v Jarrah Trading Company
37
Equity of Redemption: postponement of redemption will be void if it renders right to redeem illusory
Kinghtsbridge Estates v Byrne
38
Rights of Mortgagor: strike out of Collateral Advantages | Collateral advantage unconscionable
Cityland & Property v Dabrah
39
Strike out collateral advantages if: agreement is unfair and imposed in morally reprehensible manner
Multiservice Bookbinding v marden
40
Collateral advantages beyond redemption: either: (1) Separate transaction so enforceable after redemption (2) Part of mortgage and not actually collateral (part of mortgagee's security) (3) Neither part of mortgage or independent transactio, thus clog
(1) Kreglinger v New Patagoina Meat and Storage (2) Stanley v Wilde (3) Noakes v Rice
41
Actual undue influence: mortgage struck down if claimant proves undue influence was exerted
Stevens v Leeder
42
Presumed undue influence: if relationship between influencer and mortgage one of trust, presumption shifts to alleged wrongdoer. Does lender have notice of undue influence, if so, have they taken appropriate steps to warn mortgagor?
RBS V Etridge (burden of proof per Davies v AIB)
43
Presumed undue influence: If solicitor gives bad advice, mortgage not affected, unless mortgagee knew or had reason to believe advice was inadequate
National Westminster bank v Breeds
44
Presumed undue influence: Solicitor may be liable to mortgagor for bad advice
Padden v Bevon Ashford
45
Co-ownership: mortgagee may apply for order of sale under this section
s. 14 TOLATA 1996