Mortgages Flashcards
A mortgage is defined as: ‘a conveyance of land … as a security for a payment of a debt or the discharge of some other obligation
Stanley v White
A mortgage is an interest that is capable of being legal
s. 1 LPA 1925
In order to be a legal mortgage it must be created by a deed
s. 23 LRA 2002
An equitable mortgage would arise
- if there is a valid contract to create a mortgage
- if the land-owner only had an equitable interest in the land
A mortgage is a triggering event
It must be registered on the land registry (s. 4 LRA)
As well as the charges register
- Legal (s. 27 LRA)
- equitable (s. 32 LRA)
The date of redemption
The first date that the mortgage can be paid in full.
- It cannot be prevented altogether (Toomes v Consent)
- It can be postponed
Date of redemption postponed until 6 weeks before the end of a 17 yr lease
Fairclough v Swan Brewery
Options to purchase:
Will generally be held void if included in a mortgage Samuel v Jarrah Timber
Options to purchase can only be valid if
granted afterwards in a separate agreement
Reeve v Lisle
Collateral ties
Will be struck out if unconscionable, a penalty, a restraint or a clog on the equity of redemption
A beer tie (could only by their beer) was truck out because it could last the duration of the lease, even after the mortgage had ended
Noakes v Rice
The defendant entered into a agreement where it would distribute the company’s petrol at two of it’s garages
A tying agreement must not amount to a restriction of free trade
- Esso Petroleum v Harper’s Garage
A collateral advantage will be allowed if wholly independent of the mortgage arrangement
Kreglinger v New Patagonia
Even were a collateral tie was made before the mortgage it was still struck out as it was part of a refinancing arrangement and thus integral to the mortgage
Jones v Morgan
The court can strike down a penal rate of interest
Holles v Wyse
A penal rate of interest is one that is
- Exorbitant, extravagant or unconscionable
Cavendish Makdessi
A penal rate may also contradict the statutes of
Consumer Rights Act 2015
Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999
Consumer Credit Act 2006
An interest rate that doubled on default was held to be unfair under UTCCR
Falco Finance v Gough
Rates of 2-4% above the high street lender was deemed fair
Paragon Finance v Nash
Even though this was above the high street lender, a 21% interest rate was allowed because the mortgagor had a bad credit history
Davies v DirectLoans
An interest rate must not arise from an unfair relationship
Consumer Credit Act 2006
If the wife/partner has not expressly or impliedly consented to a mortgage being taken out over a joint company
She will continue to have an overriding equitable interest in occupation
Williams and Glyn Bank v Boland
Lenders must take care to ensure that consent is not obtained as a result of undue influence
If it is, the contract will be invalid and the mortgage set aside
Avon Finance v Bridger
Son misled elderly parents into thinking that they were singing documentation connected with the original mortgage, not a new one
Avon Finance v Bridger
Husband lied to his wife about the size and term of the loan
Barcleys Bank v O’Brian
Wife only spoke Urdu so the bank had to use her husband, who deliberately mistranslated
Natwest Bank v Amin
Where the loan is not for the wife’s benefit, or where the wife guarantees the debts of a husband or his company
The lender will be put on enquiry
RBS v Etridge (No. 2)