Mortgages Flashcards
traditional method of creating a mortgage- pre 1926
the mortgagor would transfer his estate in the land to the mortgagee as security for the loan. if the mortgagor was to default on the loan, the mortgagee would sell or let the property; alternatively, if the mortgagor paid off the debt in full the estate is conveyed back- redemption
operation of s.87- case law
Grand Junction & Co Ltd v Bates [1954]
ss.85-87 LPA 1925- how was security provided?
long lease/sublease of the premises or a charge giving the same rights-
even if leases of a mortgaged property can be granted by the borrower they don’t bind the lender
Starling v Lloyds TSB Bank [2000]
what rights does a mortgagor have?- summary
right to redeem at law and equity, right to sue-s.98 (in repossession proceedings for example), right to grant leases
mortgagee has right of possession from when mortgage is created
Four-Maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall (Properties) Ltd [1957]
the right to possession held by the mortgage is often restricted by a term in the mortgage and reserved for a case when the mortgagor fails to pay
Birmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v Caunt [1962]
why may a court order be necessary when repossessing especially a residential property
s.6 Criminal Law Act 1977
peaceful repossession is also fine, without a court order
Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank plc [1999]
court may order a sale as they see fit- which section provides for this + case law?
Barrett v Halifax Building Society [1995]- LPA 1925 s.91 (2). Here the court ordered the mortgagor to conduct the sale, because they could obtain a higher price.
what changed as part of the unified regulatory regime?
2nd mortgages are now within the boundaries of the AJA 1970
Why could we say this mortgage unification also carried some disadvantages?
Time orders under s.129 CCA remain underused
The FSMA 2000 is extraordinarily pro lender
Syed [1991]
What are the potential flaws of s.140A CCA?
Campbell v Tyrell [2022]- the debtor must set out in particulars what is actually unfair
-the provision specifically excludes RMCs
high value loans are even harder to render unfair by the courts
Bank of Beirut v Moukarzel [2021]- freedom of contract is favoured perhaps