Mortgages Flashcards
Is the mortgage a proprietary right?
Yes; a legal interest
What is a mortgage?
- A bundle of proprietary rights granted to the lender (mortgagee) as security for a loan
- Rights = to possess and sell the land in event of default of mortgage repayments
Who grants the mortgage?
The borrower (mortgagor) to the lender (mortgagee)
Why is everyday language re bank giving a mortgage technically wrong?
From bank
The bank gives us a loan which is secured by the granting of a mortgage over property
To be a legal interest, what are the formalities of a mortgage?
- Deed
- Registration
What are the requirements of a deed?
- Intended to be a deed (clear on face of doc)
- Validly executed
- Delivered
Conveyances of land/interest void unless made by deed
Recall valid execution:
* Deed must be signed by grantor (seller) in presence of a witness
* Witness needs to sign deed to confirm witnessing (attesting the signature)
Recall delivery: An acknowledgement that person entering a deed intends to be formally bound by provisions (usually dating the agreement in practice)
How is a deed validly executed for an individual and a company?
- Individual = grantor
What happens to the deed once it has been made?
Registered at Land Registry
What happens if a mortgage is not registered at the Land Registry?
- Mortgage won’t take effect as a legal mortgage in the land
- May still be an equitable interest
What are the 2 reasons an equitable mortgage is likely to arise?
- Mortgage of an equitable interest
- Defective legal mortgage
When will there be a mortgage of an equitable interest?
Where borrower holds equitable interest in land (not legal owner) any mortgage of that interest will be equitable
How is a mortgage of an equitable interest created? Is it as strict as a legal mortgage?
As in how is a mortgage of an equitable interest created (not how is an equitable mortgage created)
No - only need be in writing and signed by grantor (borrower)
Whatare the conditions for a defective legal mortgage to be regarded as an equitable mortgage?
- Not granted by a valid deed/not completed by registration = defective
- Provided in writing, contains all agreed terms, signed by mortgagor and mortgagee = equitable mortgage (LP(MP)A s2)
What is the difference between:
1. Estate contract which is recognised as an equitable mortgage
2. Equitable mortgage which is inherently equitable
- Created through a defective legal mortgage
- Equitable mortgage over equitable interest in the land
How is a mortgage fully discharged?
Following full repayment
When all reference to it has been removed from Charges Register at Land Registry
What form is used to discharge a mortgage over:
1. Whole of land title
2. Part of land (e.g. part of land being sold to buyer)
- Whole = DS1 [dis 1 whole piece of land]
- Part = DS3 [dis third of the land (not whole)]
What is the equity of redemption?
The bundle of rights that equity recognises the mortgagor as having
Must be no ‘clogs and fetters’ on the equity of redemption
What does the equitable right to redeem recognise?
That mortgage is security for a loan and not opportunity for lender to gain something more
Allows the borrower to repay the loan any time after legal date of redemption has passed
What does the equity of redemption do?
- Recognises borrower as true owner of property and protects them
- Prevents borrower from exploitation by the lender
- Protects borrower from clauses postponing/preventing redemption, collateral damages and unconscionable terms
What are the four basic rights under the equity of redemption?
- The equitable right to redeem the loan
- No postponement or prevention of redemption
- No collateral advantages to the lender
- No unconscionable terms in mortgage deeds
I.e. rights 2, 3 and 4 prevent clauses that do these things
Right 2 makes sure the equitable right to redeem is not interfered with
When will the equitable right to redeem arise?
Any day after the legal date of redemption (date specified on which borrower has to repay loan in full)
I.e. borrower can repay loan in full any time after legal date of redemption has passed
Re legal date of redemption: historically the borrower could only redeem the mortgage on this one day, if they did not pay on legal date of redemption, the lender could keep property! However equity intervened with this harsh rule and recognised that the borrower has an equitable right to redeem the mortgage any day after the legal date of redemption has passed
When is the legal date of redemption?
Usually within first 6 months of mortgage term - but as banks loan £100,000s, people cannot pay on this date, so mortgage terms are 20-30 years usually
What is the financial value of the equity of redemption?
Market value less the outstanding debt
I.e. the equity people have in their homes
Will courts allow clauses which prevent redemption altogether?
No; will be automatically void
What are the 2 conditions - that both must be satisfied - on which redemption can be postponed?
Goes against general ‘no clog or fetter’ rule
E.g. mortgage given in 2023 can not be redeemed until 2033 - locked in for 10 years
Only if borrower…
1. Gains some benefit from any ‘lock in’ (e.g. favourable rate of low interest) and
2. Gets back exactly what was mortgaged (rather than something less or worthless e.g. a lease with few years left)
Borrower must be informed of benefit/clear advantage of lock in
Will options for the lender to purchase the property be void?
Yes (esp in domestic cases) - unless they are genuinely part of an independent transaction
Mortgage should be security for a loan only rather than opportunity for lender to benefit
What is meant by collateral advantage?
Any additional value lender tries to extract from the borrower other than the repayment of capital advanced plus interest
May be struck out as contrary to equity of redemption
When will collateral advantages be void?
If they extend beyond the mortgage term unless they are genuinely part of an independent transaction
Truly independent
Will be struck out if unconscionable, in nature of penalty, or repugnant to equitable right to redeem
What is a solus tie and will it be upheld?
- Supply agreement included in favour of lender e.g. lender (e.g. brewer) makes it a condition of mortgage that borrower (e.g. pub) buys all supplies from it
- Generally upheld if they end within the mortgage term
What must unconscionable terms be?
Will be struck out
More than hard bargains (e.g. higher than market interest rate is fine); must be imposed in a morally reprehensible way e.g. taking advantage of borrower’s vulnerable position
E.g. Multiservice - term of loan was that level of repayments would be linked to swiss franc, so payments more expensive if pound fell against franc = not morally reprehensible, just a bad bargain in a situation of equal bargaining power
Cirtyland - borrower was a tenant of lender for 11 years and overall interest added up to 38% whilst tenant at risk of homelessness = morally reprehensible; clear imabalance of bargaining power and lender had exploited threat of homelessness
When can a lender justify a higher interest rate?
- Where borrowers have poor credit history and are a credit risk (higher risk lender)
- Where lender themselves in financial difficulty (as long as not exercising discretion for improper purpose)
Lenders are entitled to make money from loans!
What is the test for deciding if a high interest rate is an unconscionable term and what factors to be considered?
Has the term been imposed in a morally reprehensible manner?
* Consider circumstances in which term imposed and factors court had regard to
When will a penalty interest rate imposed in event of borrower’s default be void?
When it far exceeds the lender’s losses
If a term is declared void, what happens to the rest of the agreement?
The rest remains in force; the void term is not enforceable
How does a bank ensure it has priority in cases that could be undue influence?
E.g. husband with business takes out mortgage over family home he owns with wife - mortgage deed contains priority clause stating that bank’s interest ranks higher than freehold ownership - but if wife successfully argues undue influence, the bank’s interest ranks after wife’s freehold interest and bank cannot repossess and sell house
Lender must write to party granting the mortgage not for their benefit (e.g. wife) explaining bank needs confirmation from independent solicitor that they have explained transaction to her - should not proceed until confirmation of explanation
Bank gives all information to independent solicitor
What must the independent solicitor do?
Meet party entering into mortgage not for own benefit alone and explain undue influence risk and documents in non-technical language; pointing out risks and explaining they have a choice