Mortgage Possessions Flashcards

1
Q

The mortgage is equitable only

A

Barclays Bank Ltd v Bird - Equitable mortgagee entitled to possession order
(Seek order vesting term of years under s.90 LPA 1925)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a ‘reasonable period’ under s.36 AJA 1970?

A

C&G BS v Norgan: When calc’g a ‘reasonable period’, the starting point is the remaining term of the mortgage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 36 AJA 1970

A

Power to delay giving M’gee possession if M’gor can repay sums due within a reasonable period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Section 8 AJA 1973

A

Ignore early repayment provisions when calc’g ‘sums due’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

D propose to repay arrears, but has poor payment history

A

Abbey National v Mewton Court entitled to infer from poor payment record that unlikely to make future payments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

D proposes to repay arrears, but this is beyond his means

A

First National Bank v Syed Court should not exercise its discretion where the required payments are manifestly beyond D’s means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

D proposes to sell the property

A

Mortgage Services Funding PLC v Steele: Property can be sold just as well by Mortgagee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

D proposes to sell the property, but is in negative equity

A

Negative equity: s.36 discretion not available. Cheltenham & Gloucester v Krausz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tenants app. under MR(PoTe)A 2010 for 2 month postponement

A

Following conditions must be met:
Land includes a dwelling house
There is an unauthorised tenancy
Tenant has made an app. to extend the period of the PO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

D raises HRA defence

A

Barclays Bank Plc v Ellis A party seeking to rely on HRA should provide the court with any decisions of the ECHR on which he relies. Mere references to the ECHR do not help the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

D raises hard circumstances

A

Abbey National Mortgages Plc v Bernand Cannot suspend PO, however hard the circumstances, if no prospect of reducing arrears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

D did not receive claim form

A

Akram v Adam If CF was posted to D’s address, this is good service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

D asks for postponement pending the outcome of other proceedings

A

Albany Home Loans Ltd v Massey Court may take view that there is no realistic prospect of discharging arrears, despite D’s pending proceedings (eg for unfair dismissal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

D argues that the Mortgagors are not present

A

Alliance Building Society v Shave PO may be made against occupier in absence of mortgagors, as this would not prejudice mortgagors in their absence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

D is an unauthorised tenant and argues that the Mortgagee must respect his tenancy

A

Britannia Building Society v Earl Unauthorised tenant becomes a statutory tenant as against the Mortgagor, but not as against the Mortgagee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

D proposes to sell property, but proceeds of sale will not discharge the debt

A

C&G BS v Krausz Where POS will not discharge debt, s.36 does not empower court to suspend warrant of possession

17
Q

D has a counterclaim against C

A

Citibank Trust v Ayivor Existence of counterclaim does not affect M’gee’s right to PO

18
Q

Someone tries to dispute the claim, but they are not actually in possession

A

Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Alstonbridge Properties M’gee’s app for PO is simply an app for an order for recovery of land, and not proceedings for enforcing the mortgage. If a person is not actually in possession, they are not parties to the claim: despite the fact that they are entitled to possession.

19
Q

Judge is minded to refuse to make a concurrent money judgment

A

Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society v Grattidge Mortgagee entitled to money judgment. No inconsistency w/ PO

20
Q

Judge is minded to make a costs order that does not reflect the mortgage provisions

A

Gomba Holdings (UK) Ltd v Minories Finance Ltd (No. 2) The court’s discretion as to costs should usually be exercised so as to reflect contractual rights.