Moral Theory Flashcards
What are two of the most important characteristics that make us human?
Sentience & Rationality
The ability to critically reflect on actions is what makes us moral
What are the differences between voluntarism and intellectualism?
X is good because God loves it, morality depends on God’s will
God loves X because it is good, moral standards independent of God
Look over pros and cons of Voluntarism and Intellectualism
Good job
What are the key features of Ethical Egoism?
Morality is determined by self-interest
Morality is the set of principles that self-interested people would agree to
Moral duty is to ourselves and not to others
WHat is sentience?
Beings able to experience pleasure and pain
What is the fundamental principle of Utilitarianism and what did John Mill say about this?
What matters morally is (only) the pleasure and pain od sentient beings
“Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness”
“Each person’s happiness is a good to that person, and general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of persons”
What are the main elements of Utilitarianism?
- Consequentialism - Right action produces the best consequences
- Welfarism - Use happiness to evaluate consequences
- (Hedonism - Happiness/well-being is pleasure (and absence of pain))
- Value determines rightness
- The good is prior to the right
What are the three main types of Utilitarianism?
- Act Utilitarianism: - Always choose the act with the best consequences
- can be self-defeating (time-consuming, spontaneity, friendship) - Indirect Utilitarianism: - Follow the decision procedure with the best consequences (more longterm happiness)
- Act Utilitarianism isn’t the best decision procedure
- Can be collectively self defeating (collectively might not have produced so much happiness overall - think grass) - Rule Utilitarianism: - Follow the set of rules with the best consequences if everyone follows them
- ‘What if everyone did that?’ (closer to common sense morality then act or indirect; is it close enough?)
- Self defeating if everyone was impartial
How does Hare’s universalizability argument fit into Utilitarianism?
Moral point of view is universal and impartial
Moral judgements must count everyone’s preferences equally
State the Hedonistic view on pleasure
It is the only thing that has intrinsic value
What are three possibilities that pleasure could be?
- Desirable mental state
- Desirable sensation
- Desirable consciousness
What are some problems with Utilitarianism, and Hedonism in particular?
- Does sadistic pleasure out weigh suffering (Christians and lions)?
- Crisp: Choose the Oyster life of a little bit of happiness for hundred years –> Mill: Some kinds of pleasure are more desirable than others, appeal to competent judges (best guide we have), might not be as pleasurable but still a better experience
- Nozick’s experience machine: People want real lives not artificial, want to actually do things not merely love experiances, want to be a certain type of person not just a series of experiances
What are some objections and rebuttals to the impracticality of Utilitarianism?
- Requires impossible calculations, save a child that grows up to build a doomsday machine, would say its wrong to save
Dunno what consequences are always gonna be
+They are expected results not actual results (saving was likely to produce the best consequences)
- Still too hard to calculate
+ Tendencies of action types, not results of particular actions (saving is generally good)
Why assume it is easy to decide what to do?
Elaborate on the injustice objection to Utilitarianism
Sheriff hangs bob (who he knows is innocent) to stop people dying in a riot
- Ut says you should hang bob but doing that is very wrong
- Hanging is direct, riot is indirect
+Real-life is more complicated, hanging bob may not actually produce the best results - But what if hanging did produce the best results?
+ Expected tendencies, not actual results; hangin innocent is generally a bad thing
+Rule Ut: what is the best code for society? it is better for sheriffs to follow code of not hanging innocent people
+ Bite the bullet: If hanging really is best policy then accept it
What is the alternative criterion?
Indulge in the arguments for and against the alienating objection to Ut
Buy toy for daughters birthday but give it to child who’d enjoy ti more
Scotland play india in world cup final, winning country will be very happy
- Utilitarianism demands absolute impartiality; give toy to stranger and let india win
- Morality does not demand absolute impartiality; you should take your relationships and goals into account
- Therefore: Ut is implausible
+ Real life is more complicated: what will really max happiness? better to have a present for child
+ What is best decision procedure: cannot judge individual happiness, should follow rules of thumb; ‘give toys to your kids’, ‘try to win in sporting events’
+ Bite the bullet: Morality is absolutely impartial, You should adopt the moral point of view
+ Rule Ut: what is the best code for society? Things go better if people are not impartial
What are some key features of Kantian Ethics?
- Believe in categorical right and not consequentialism; we ought to do things no matter what and based purely on what’s morally right
- Things don’t depend on your intentions, it is more about your fundamental attitudes towards beings that are morally relevant
- Ought to act from duty and not inclination (sympathetic people are not morally good)
- Only duties to beings of your kind/’level’, not to God or animals but should still treat animals right cos otherwise you are damaging your own moral self
What is goodwill?
The will to do the right thing
What are Kant’s views on happiness?
- What we ought to do and what we want to do can be valued in ‘moral goodness’
- ‘Commands’ (imperative) are primary while judgemetns of good and bad are secondary, the third thing is moral goodness (goodwill)
- Happiness and good will, one is conditionally good the other is not (eg winning and cheating)
- Morally good people deserve to be happy, happiness is earned
- Both happiness and moral goodness are pursued for their own ends, Instrumental goodness is not morally value, even pursuing happiness isn’t justifiable in instrumental goodness as happiness is instrumental
Kant on sympathy?
Ought to act from duty and not inclination (sympathetic people are not morally good)
Other people’s pleasure and pain may effect your own (if you are a sympathetic person), as such, it is not morally unreasonable for it to be valid but it isn’t approved by Kant as it is largely a selfish act
It is an inclination as it makes helping dependent on sympathy and selfishness