moral philosophy Flashcards
generality in moral theories
universal theory with general validity
specificity within moral theories
suiting manifold of experiences and specific situations –> concrete, adaptable
cardinal virtues
courage
justice
prudence
temperance
plato virtue theory
virtue = knowledge
have general knowledge of what is good
plato bad actions
consequence of a lack of knowledge of what is good, not a desire for what is bad
3 parts of soul
philosopher kings - reason - wisdom
soldiers - spirit - courage
civilians - appetite - temperament
plato - when is someone virtuous?
soul should keep balance over the virtues, wisdom rules over courage and temperament and keeps them in line.
virtue = right order of the soul
master virtue = justice
Aristotle - teleology
everything aims towards something, in the end everything aims towards eudaimonia (living a good live)
Aristotle - human good
activity of the soul in accordance with virtue (in according with best and most complete)
Aristotle virtue
Golden mean = every virtue is a condition intermediate between two extremes
Not just sensing the right mean, it has a strong rationality and is closely linked to a stable and virtuous character
Examples of golden means
pleasure pain: insensible - temperate - self-undulgent
shame: shy - modest - shameless
can change within different situations
intellectual virtues aristotle
reasoning part of the soul
theoretical (wisdom, episteme, nous), practical (phronesis), productive (techne)
ethical virtues aristotle
part of the soul that is able to follow reason,
courage, temperance, modesty, truthfulness
Traits of character Aristotle
virtuous action is defined by the state of the agent: choice is based on stable character, agent knows what he is doing and what he is doing this for.
Anscombe modern moral philosophy
gap that needs to be filled by an account of human nature, human action, the type of characteristic a virtue is and most importantly: human flourishing
Nussbaum - capability approach
non-relative virtues. Virtue is a good way for reacting properly within a certain situation.
Capability approach: moral system in which everyone is able to develop the same capabilities
John Doris - virtue ethics
We have no robust character traits and therefore should not focus on character, but on the circumstances.
Focus on the features of the environment that impact behavioral outcomes
Kant - deontology
what ought we to do?
what is morally forbidden? - constraints
NOT aimed towards happiness, but how we can act according to the moral law.
Priority of the right (not of the Good)
Not about consequences, only about the actions themselves
agent relativity
reason with reference to the agent: ‘I have an overriding moral reason not to kill anyone myself - even if it saved many people’
agent neutrality
reason of reference to the agent + element of universality
‘I have reason to contribute to the aim of minimizing the killing of innocents’
Kant - happiness
Glückswürdigkeit vs. Glückseligkeit
are we worthy to be happy? instead of whether we are happy to not.
Hopefully this overlaps
Kant - duty
necessity of an action from respect for the law
Perfect: strict, narrow, violation provokes moral blaim
Imperfect: exceptions in favor of inclinations, wide and with latitude, >moral credit
Can act in conformity with duty and acting from duty –> second is moral action
Categorical imperative
- I ought never to conduct myself except so that I could also will that my maxim become a universal law
- act so that you use humanity as much in your own person as in the person of every other, always at the same time as end and never merely as means
Kant - human dignity
source of human dignity is its status as a universal legislator.
Autonomy is the capacity of being governed by self-imposed laws