Moral Philosophies Flashcards

1
Q

Moral Relativism

A

pre-supposes that there are no universal moral principles; choice is congruent to the individual’s personal choices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Utilitarianism

A

“The greatest good for the greatest number”; primary concern is the maximization of happiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rule Utilitarianism

A

Action is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that “the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance.” No exceptions because happiness is not optimized.

Ex. It doesn’t matter if the person will be happy from being saved from removal of the program, cheating is wrong and morally unacceptable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Act Utilitarianism

A

Person’s act is morally right if and only if it produces at least as much happiness as any other act that the person could perform at that time.

Ex. Even though cheating is wrong as a general principle, if it makes this person happy because it saves them from being kicked out of the program morally acceptable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Deontology

A

Personhood creates a range of rights and obligations because every person has inherent dignity – something that is fundamental to and is held in equal measure by each and every person. Actions that obey these rules are ethical, while actions that do not, are not.

Ex. Do not lie, even if you were hiding jews in your basement and you were questioned by a nazi soldier asking if there were any jews there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Basic Tenets of Deontological Ethics

A
  1. Any rational person would subscribe to that belief
  2. Morality is constituted by conformity of beliefs, values, and principles that DO NOT have any exceptions.
  3. Don’t treat people as your means to an end aka don’t use people.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rights Based Ethics

A

here are some rights, both positive and negative, that all humans have based only on the fact that they are human.

Ex. Right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, marry, work, bear children, a lawyer etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Natural Law Theory (NLT)

A

The act congruent with human nature is moral. The intelligibility of the universe cannot be reduced to cause and effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rights based approaches in comparison to Deontology and Utilitarianism

A

Utilitarianism tends to be “majoritarian” whereas RBA focuses on the minorities. Similar to deontology in the emphasis on “autonomy of the subject” the act is moral which instances rational self-determination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Natural law in contrast to Utilitarianism and Deontology

A

Similar to utilitarianism because both are teleological (oriented to end/outcomes)—concerned with the human good. Similar to Kant (Deontology) because natural law theorists do not think happiness can be reduced to what is “pleasant” or “desirable.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Founder of Deontology

A

Immanuel Kant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Founders of Utilitarianism

A

Jeremy Bentham - foundation for a rational morality is provided the tendency to seek pleasure and avoid pain

John Stuart Mill - expands and develops theory to the maximization of “the greatest good for the greatest number” while optimizing happiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Material Cause (NLT)

A

The stuff of which something is made.

Ex. Material cause of a chair is wood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Efficient Cause (NLT)

A

Causes that count for the creation of something.

Ex. Efficient cause of a chair is a carpenter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Formal Cause (NLT)

A

That which makes a thing what it is and not something else.

Ex. The formal cause of humans is the genetic code that gives us the ability to reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Final Cause (NLT)

A

That for which entities exist presupposes that there is a “human good” that is accumulated in terms of a normative understanding of what constitutes being human.

Ex. The final cause of a human is to live rationally and the final cause of a chair is to sit in it.

17
Q

Virtue Ethics

A

Good choices make good persons. Participation in good communities enables/cultivates good persons who make good choices.

18
Q

Proportionality

A

The good effect is sufficiently desirable to compensate for the bad effect.

19
Q

Totality

A

Preservation of what is highest/most distinctly human- justification for amputation, voluntary organ donation.

20
Q

Pullman (There are Universal Ethical Principles That Should Govern the Conduct of Medicine and Research Worldwide)

A

All human beings have basic moral worth irrespective of any contingent historical, traditional, or cultural circumstances. The essence of morality is to guard, protect, and advance the fundamental value that there is intrinsic worth. Conception of dignity is that people have rights because they have dignity. Basic dignity is the formal, universal, noncontingent concept of fundamental worth. Personal dignity expresses something of morality’s content. The notion of this is to understand the fact that the self is socially constructed (self-esteem/respect). Content of moral discourse largely relies on social and personal dignity to do the work. Basic dignity functions as a meaning constraint on moral discourse.

21
Q

Decker (No Universal Ethical Principles)

A

Principles must be able to motivate particular judgement or they are morally meaningless. The history of bioethical principles demonstrates that it is hard to separate what is historically contingent from what is universal in them. There is an underestimation of how much a culture can differ ethically than his/her own. Kant believed that the ultimate moral principle must be universal in the sense that it applies to all rational being whenever. We should avoid assuming a false kind of consistency in principles that overshadow relevant differences in particular cases. Moral propositions must be self-evident or sustained by proofs or demonstration. A principle being universal doesn’t make it absolute. The normative force of principles is difficult to locate because it is dependent upon social, economic, educational, and religious influences.