Moral Philosophies Flashcards
Moral Relativism
pre-supposes that there are no universal moral principles; choice is congruent to the individual’s personal choices.
Utilitarianism
“The greatest good for the greatest number”; primary concern is the maximization of happiness.
Rule Utilitarianism
Action is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that “the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance.” No exceptions because happiness is not optimized.
Ex. It doesn’t matter if the person will be happy from being saved from removal of the program, cheating is wrong and morally unacceptable.
Act Utilitarianism
Person’s act is morally right if and only if it produces at least as much happiness as any other act that the person could perform at that time.
Ex. Even though cheating is wrong as a general principle, if it makes this person happy because it saves them from being kicked out of the program morally acceptable.
Deontology
Personhood creates a range of rights and obligations because every person has inherent dignity – something that is fundamental to and is held in equal measure by each and every person. Actions that obey these rules are ethical, while actions that do not, are not.
Ex. Do not lie, even if you were hiding jews in your basement and you were questioned by a nazi soldier asking if there were any jews there.
Basic Tenets of Deontological Ethics
- Any rational person would subscribe to that belief
- Morality is constituted by conformity of beliefs, values, and principles that DO NOT have any exceptions.
- Don’t treat people as your means to an end aka don’t use people.
Rights Based Ethics
here are some rights, both positive and negative, that all humans have based only on the fact that they are human.
Ex. Right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, marry, work, bear children, a lawyer etc.
Natural Law Theory (NLT)
The act congruent with human nature is moral. The intelligibility of the universe cannot be reduced to cause and effect.
Rights based approaches in comparison to Deontology and Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism tends to be “majoritarian” whereas RBA focuses on the minorities. Similar to deontology in the emphasis on “autonomy of the subject” the act is moral which instances rational self-determination.
Natural law in contrast to Utilitarianism and Deontology
Similar to utilitarianism because both are teleological (oriented to end/outcomes)—concerned with the human good. Similar to Kant (Deontology) because natural law theorists do not think happiness can be reduced to what is “pleasant” or “desirable.”
Founder of Deontology
Immanuel Kant
Founders of Utilitarianism
Jeremy Bentham - foundation for a rational morality is provided the tendency to seek pleasure and avoid pain
John Stuart Mill - expands and develops theory to the maximization of “the greatest good for the greatest number” while optimizing happiness.
Material Cause (NLT)
The stuff of which something is made.
Ex. Material cause of a chair is wood.
Efficient Cause (NLT)
Causes that count for the creation of something.
Ex. Efficient cause of a chair is a carpenter.
Formal Cause (NLT)
That which makes a thing what it is and not something else.
Ex. The formal cause of humans is the genetic code that gives us the ability to reason.