moral anti realism Flashcards
what is the difference between cognitivism and non cognitivism
- cognitivism = claim that moral lang. expresses truth apt prepositions, aims to describe the world so can be true or false depending on how well it can describe it
- NC = opposite of C, instead expresses other, non-prepositional mental states such as emotion or a command
what is the difference between moral realism and anti realism
- moral realism = moral properties/truths/facts exist MID
- MAR = don’t exist MID so either MD or don’t exist at all
what objections to moral realism come under the anti realist error theory by Mackie
- queerness
- relativity
what objections to MR come under the anti realist emotivism theory by Ayer
-v,h
- verification principle
- humes fork
what objections to MR come under the anti realist prescriptivism theory by Hare
afm,iog
- argument from motivation
- is ought gap
what does Mackie’s error theory say about ethical language
C OR NC?
- cognitivist
- ML = cognitivist so can be true or false but moral properties = anti realism perspective
- so moral lang. aims to describe the world but fails
- so all moral lang. is false
- when we use moral lang. we make an error and project our opinion into reality as if it is an objective truth
- Mackie thinks his arguments from relativity and queerness demonstrate that moral properties do not exist MID
what would error theory claim about the statement “stealing is morally permissible”
- the person is trying to claim that stealing is objectively good
- the claim is false since a property of goodness in stealing does not exist MIDly
what is the conclusion if error theory is applied to statements about
- mythology
- religion
- mind
- those creatures don’t exist and all statements about them are false
- God doesn’t exist so all statements about God are false
- Mind doesn’t exist so all statements about it are false
what does Ayers emotivism claim about ethical lang
- C OR NC
- VP = moral lang. is meaningless —> not truth apt
- instead it expresses some other mental state
- emotivism = this mental state is one of the sentiments of approval or disapproval
- boo, hurrah theory
- NC
what would emotivism claim about the statement “stealing is morally permissible”
- expression of approval to stealing
- hurrah for stealing
emotivism means all moral views are either entirely subjective or trivial expressions of emotions. what does this mean
- reduces moral views to preferences
- so it is impossible to have meaningful disagreements
- does not properly account for what we mean when we use moral language
- when we say “genocide is bad” this is stronger than “boo to genocide” this is actually an objective claim
what does prescriptivism claim about moral language
- C OR NC
- non cognitivist
- ML = meaningless according to VP so is not truth apt so does not express prepositional statements
- instead expresses some mental state
- prescriptivism = a command not to do x
- commands = universal, how everyone should act
what would prescriptivism say about “stealing is morally permissible”
- “you should steal”
- claim that stealing is morally prescribed
how can the idea of universalising moral standards resolve the issue of subjectivity faced by prescriptivism?
- provides us with a way of criticising some moral views which is a problem for emotivism
- even if someone is inconsistent with their views/hypocritical we cannot say they’re correct/incorrect but can call them consistent/inconsistent
how can the idea of universalising moral standards be an issue for prescriptivism
- someone could hold abhorrent moral views and this would be fine provided they were consistent in their views
- would make them praiseworthy according to Hare