Money Flashcards
The Brimnes
Where a contract provides for payment in cash of a specified currency, the word cash prima facie includes any commercially recognised method of transferring funds which gives the transferee immediate and unconditional use of the funds. An obligation expressed in money will generally be discharged if the creditor receives the “commercial equivalent” of cash or money.
5 important legal characteristics of money.
- Its legal value isn’t it’s intrinsic value as paper or metal, but the unit of account in which the money is denominated.
- Money isn’t bought or exchanged, it’s either borrowed or received as a gift or in discharge of an obligation owed to the recipient.
- Money is fully negotiable, meaning a good faith recipient for value receives good title
- A creditor is not obliged to accept or entitled to demand anything other than money in satisfaction of a debt owed to him
- Money is fungible, any unit is interchangeable with any other unit/ combination of units with the same value
3 main functions of money
unit of account, a store of value and a medium of exchange
What is the most important method for discharging money obligations in commercial transactions.
bank money
How is electronic money defined?
Electronic money is defined by the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 Act as “electronically ( including magnetically) stored monetary value as represented by a claim on the electronic money issuer which (a) is issued on receipt of funds for the purpose of making transactions [and] (b) is accepted by a person other than the electronic money issuer (Art 2(1))
What’s the difference between tangible and intangible money?
Bank money:
- Isn’t issued under state authority
- Isn’t legal tender
- Isn’t a universal medium of exchange
- Isn’t negotiable
What are the two broad categories of intangible assets ?
- Wholly generic claims: a right to be paid from the defendant’s general assets, which is not attached to any specific asset held by the defendant. These claims are PERSONAL and not proprietary in nature. The claimant takes his chance as an unsecured creditor. This category includes contractual claims for debt or damages.
- Specific claims where the claimant can point to a particular intangible asset (typically a bank deposit) as beneficially vested in him by a trust, whether created by an act of the parties or in law. Specific claims to intangible “money” are by definition PROPRIETARY and can therefore only be asserted against a defendant who still holds the asset in question.
Why is the distinction between the two broad categories of intangible assets important?
Real rights such as specific, proprietary rights survive the debtor’s insolvency and can be enforced to the exclusion of other creditors, while personal rights are converted into a right to prove in the insolvency in competition with other creditors.
When will our definition of money be important
In order to fall within SOGA 1979, a contract must involve a transfer “for a money consideration”. A Bill of Exchange is only a negotiable instrument for the purposes of the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 if it requires the drawee to pay “a sum certain in money”.
How did Moss v Hancock define money?
“that which passes freely from hand to hand throughout the community in final discharge of debts and full payment for commodities, being accepted equally without reference to the character or credit of the person who offers it and without the intention of the person who receives it to consume it or apply it to any other use than in turn to tender it to others in discharge of debts or payment for commodities”
How does Article XIX(d) of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement define currency?
“includes without limitation, coins, paper money, bank balances, bank acceptances and government obligations issued with a maturity not exceeding twelve months”
Monetary sovereignty of States?
According to the State Theory of money, money is an exercise of sovereignty by the State in question, and so must exist within a legal framework.
What does the Institutional Theory of money emphasise ?
The Institutional Theory of money emphasises that money primarily consists of a claim against the issuing central bank, but that money includes the credit balances of sight deposits made by the public with commercial banks, which are considered money as they can be transformed on demand into banknotes.
What is the difficulty that can arise with allowing commercial banks’ money to count as money ?
If the commercial bank doesn’t have sufficient assets to place with the central bank in return for notes.
Where the value of money isn’t linked to an external asset such as gold, how is the value of money achieved?
Monetary policy of central bank (& public confidence in this!)
What’s the focus of the Institutional Theory of money?
Money is direct/indirect claim against central bank. The role of the central bank is controlling the amount of money within the economy to bring price stability
What’s the central bank’s primary objective according to the Institutional Theory of money?
price stability
Where a contract provides for payment in cash of a specified currency, the word cash prima facie includes any commercially recognised method of transferring funds
The Brimnes:
Where a contract provides for payment in cash of a specified currency, the word cash prima facie includes any commercially recognised method of transferring funds which gives the transferee immediate and unconditional use of the funds. An obligation expressed in money will generally be discharged if the creditor receives the “commercial equivalent” of cash or money.
Iskandar v Bank of America
Existance of an account is the touchstone of the banker-customer relationship.
What effect does the institutional theory of money have on government’s role?
The need for central bank independence reduces the state’s role in monetary affairs, but the State must pursue sound fiscal policies to support the success of monetary policy.
Moss v Hancock
Where a coin is sold as a curiosity, an order for restitution may be made if it has been stolen, even if it has been sold on. This case held that the coin hadn’t been received by the appellant (a dealer in curiosities) as a current coin and so an order was therefore made ordering the appellant to restore it to the respondent.
This case defines money as:
“that which passes freely from hand to hand throughout the community in final discharge of debts and full payment for commodities, being accepted equally without reference to the character or credit of the person who offers it and without the intention of the person who receives it to consume it or apply it to any other use than in turn to tender it to others in discharge of debts or payment for commodities”
Miller v Race
A “good faith purchaser” or “holder in due course” of a negotiable instrument (cheque, banknote etc) gets good title if they were unaware of the defect in title. Mr Race was a bank clerk who refused to honour a banknote from Mr Miller (an innkeeper who’d received it in payment from a tenant)
Money, properly speaking, is whatever common consent has fixed upon as a sign denoting a certain value
Glasgow Pavillion v Motherwell
A debtor is required to pay their debts in legal tender or “the current coin of the realm”
Scriptural money
Funds held in current accounts at commercial banks
What emphasises the difficulties with treating commercial bank money as money?
The 2007-2009 Financial Crash
Are bank notes promissory notes?
Bank notes are a promissory note under the Bills of Exchange Act 1882, but they’re more than just a promissory note as they also constitute currency.
Can we still describe money as a Chattel?
No, most money is e-money.
Is the state theory of money still valid?
Money continues to exist in a legal framework but the creation/existence of money is no longer dependent on it being issued in a physical form on behalf of the state
Banco de Portugal v Waterlow & Sons Ltd
The defendant unknowingly printed fraudulent notes following completion of genuine order. Banco de Portugal then had to withdraw both genuine & fradulent notes from circulation. The majority judgement in the House of Lords was that the bank could recover the face value of the new notes they were obliged to issue, as when issuing notes, a central bank is effectively parting with a portion of it’s wealth and so Waterlow had to indemnify the bank against the liabilities which arose as a result of Waterlow’s mistake. **This case emphasises money’s function as a store of value!! ***
Can we regard money as commodity?
Usually no.
We can when the coins have been acquired with a view towards melting them down (R v Dickinson), when the coins are purchased for their rarity (as the coin is the object of exchange, not the medium of exchange), where coins are sold by weight with reference to their metallic value.
-Money is treated as a commodity when this reflects the intentions of the parties.
Could new forms of money emerge?
New forms of money could emerge as a means of payment if they gain sufficient acceptance within the commercial world. We may already be able to regard bank deposits as money as they’re now widely accepted as a means of payment. Cryptocurrencies are becoming increasingly accepted and may one day gain wide enough commercial acceptance to function as a means of payment.