Molmed Pharmacology Flashcards
Key directive of the 1906 Pure food and drugs act:
Requires correct labelling of ingredients of drug
What immediately followed the Pure food and drugs act?
Sulphinamide tagedy:
Ingredients may have been listed, but they didn’t have to be safe and added sweet diethylene glycol was toxic
Ensuring lawsuit because of incorrect naming, not toxicity
Key directive of the 1938 Cosmetic and drug safety act?
Safety:
Pre market safety testing, requirement of clinical data for compound approval
What is a downside of the 1938 Cosmetic drug and safety act?
Automatic approval of compounds if FDA doesn’t give active rejection within 180 days
Key directive of the 1962 amendment to the Cosmetic and drug safety act:
Drug actually needs to work
Drugs need active approval from FDA
Evidence of effectiveness of compounds needs to be supplied
Clinical trials need to be conducted and adverse reactions recorded
Trial patients need to give consent
First German drug registration act:
1961: First time new drugs need to be officially registered
Problem with Contegran?
Teratogenic drug given to treat morning sickness: many stillbirths and disabled babies born
Drug approved despite clinical testing required bc it was never tested on pregnant people
Key directives of the 1976 German drug approval act?
Drug needs to be high quality, actually show efficacy
Restrictions on labelling, manufacturing, distribution and marketin in place to ensure safety
Liability of pharma companies if shit goes worng
Advertising only for over the counter drugs
Safety precautions for participants in clinical trials
Key directives of current Arztneimittelgesetz:
Defines what drug is
Labelling criteria: info and structure
Drug manufacturing standards: including transport and distribution
Safety precautions for clinical trials
Approval required for drugs (simplified if very similar to existing compound, not nec when homeopathic)
Homeopathic stuff needs to be traditional, no proof of efficacy
Pharmacovigilance post market release
What approvals is the BfArM responsible for?
Approval of new small molecule drugs
Regulation of controlled substances
Risk evaluation of drugs and medical products in use
Permissions for studies/research
What does the Paul Ehrlich institute do?
Approval of vaccines and biomedicines
Evaluation of allergens for therapy and diagnostics
Evaluation of antibodies, blood and tissue products
What is under the jurisdiction of the EMA?
Harmonisation of EU lawscape regarding drugs
Give evaluation of drug application, but not approval
Compulsory for approval of biomedicinces, antiviral and orphan drugs
Anti HIV, cancer, diabetes, neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases (for severe diseases)
Outline the process of drug discovery
Identification of biological target -»
Screen for compounds interacting with target with high-throughput bioassay -»
Score for hits (compound actually does thing)-»
Refine compound through addition of functional groups-»
Identify lead compound to carry on to in vitro testing of pharmacodynamics-»
Test compound in cell culture and in animal model (coincides with Phase 0) -»
Optimised compound with idea of starting dose
Outline the steps of drug development:
Aim is to provide proof of therapeutic effect and safety
Phase 0: in vitro and vivo determination of drug safety and starting dose, test Pkinetics, Pdynamics and potential toxicity effects
Investigational new drug application (IND)
Phase 1: compound tested in healthy humans, open label no control; test for safety, possible adverse effects with increasing dose, Pkinetics
Phase 2: treatment vs control group, randomised blinded; determiantion of effectiveness and optimal dosage for greatest effect, define most frequent side effects; observation of drug-drug interactions
Phase 3: evidence of efficacy and safety in diseased patients, treatment vs control, randomised blinded; profitability decision
New drug application (NDA) summary of findings
Regulatory body approval if effective in intended use and benefits outweigh risks
Phase 4: Pharmacovigilance of drug on market (open label no control real life people) asess long term effects, stability, compare how drug performs vs already existing drugs; see rarer side effects and long term adverse effects
Criteria for good clinical trials:
Participants randomised to remove bias
Even matching of treatment and control groups
Blinding (preferably double to remove placebo effect on study objects and bias on study conductors)
Defined endpoints clinically relevant (or good surrogate endpoints chosen that don’t easily change based on sth outside trial eg blood pressure, mortality LDL content, major adverse events stroke etc)
Study planned ahead and conducted accordingly
Data analysis potentially blinded, including dropout trial patients to make sure trial doesn’t look safer than it is
Cohort number to be sufficiently large
What are the failings of clinical trials:
Sample size not reliable for whole population extrapolation
Rarer side effects unobserved due to small smaple size
Long term effects not observed
No comparison of drug effectivity to drugs already on market till phase 4 in most cases
Unintetional bias enrolling healthy patients in early trials, comorbidities irl much more frequent