Module One Flashcards
4 mechanisms of odor action
- quasi-pharmacological
- semantic
- hedonic
- placebo
Chp. 1; aroma text
Explain quasi-pharmacological mechanism
- similar to pharmacological mechanism w/ EOs
- “quasi” refers specifically to the significantly smaller dosage of active constituents
- affecting factors: biological parameters + direct dose
Chp. 1; aroma text
Explain semantic action
- based on associations made with situations involving that scent
- often utilized w/ odor conditioning
- affecting factors: culture + personal experiences. When dose exceeds specific limit = memory association may change/disappear
Chp. 1; aroma text
Explain hedonic mechanism
- based on pleasant OR unpleasant feelings caused by particular odors
- affecting factors: culture; inverse U, increase in dose until optimal range is met, further increasing equates to a negative response
Chp. 1; aroma text
Explain placebo mechanism
- effect due to particular expections of the subject
- “reputation” of an odor is important here
- affecting factors: strongly depend on the expectations of the individual + info provided. Interpersonal variability is expected (some respond more readily than others)
Chp. 1; aroma text
Explain “qualitative research”?
- gathers participants’ experiences, perceptions, and behavior.
- answers the hows and whys instead of how many or how much.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/
Explain “quantitative research”
- deals with data that are numerical or that can be converted into numbers.
- basic methods used to investigate numerical data are called ‘statistics’
- statistical techniques are concerned with the organisation, analysis, interpretation and presentation of numerical data
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/quantitative-resear
Categories that primary research falls into are…
- Lab experiments: animal/volunteer in artificial + controlled surroundings
- Comparative clinical trials: simple/complex experiment offered to group of participants + followed up w/ to see what happens
- Surveys
- Organizational case studies: researcher attempts to capture complexity of a change effort through a story (attempting to implement evidence)
- Cohort studies: group of individuals are followed up to see what happens to them
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper
parallel group comparison
each group receives a diff. treatment, w/ both groups being entered at the same time; results are analysed by comparing groups
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper
randomized comparison
every participant is allocated at random to the intervention or control group
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper
paired/matched comparison
participants receiving diff. treatments are matched to balance potential confounding variables (age, sex); results are analysed in terms of diff. between pairs
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper
within-participant comparison
participants assessed before and after intervention; results are analysed in terms of within-participant changes
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper
single-blind
participants do not know which treatment they are receiving
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper
double-blind
participants + investigators do not know which treatment they are receiving/giving
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper
cross-over
each participant received both the intervention and control treatments (randomly); typically separated by a “washout” period
Chp 3; How To Read a Paper