Module 9: Capital Budgeting Flashcards
figuring out what long-term projects a company should invest in
capital budgeting
(ex: should we choose to build a new factory, etc.)
T or F: With capital budgeting, there’s limited resources so companies have to choose WHICH project to pursue.
True
If we can invest in a project that’s going to return (more/less) than what we put into it, then we will do the project.
more
(if the PV of those future cash flows outweighs the cost, then we should do the project since NPV is the gold standard for capital budgeting)
A cost that has already been incurred (something we’ve already paid).
Sunk Costs
T or F: Paying for sunk costs depends on if you decide to do a certain project or not.
False; will pay for it whether or not we do the project
We (do/do not) want to consider sunk costs when figuring out the relevant cost for a project.
do not
we bought some land 2 years ago and now we’re trying to decide if we should build a new factory on the land. The price we paid for the land 2 years ago isn’t relevant for our decision because we already paid that.
This is an example of what type of cost?
Sunk cost
Say we spent $700,000 on some land 2 years ago. This is a sunk cost, so we don’t want to consider it. BUT, let’s say we could sell that land today for $1.2 million.
This is an ________ ______ because if we don’t build on it, we could turn around and sell it, which is a relevant cost.
opportunity cost
T or F: There is always an opportunity cost associated with a sunk cost.
False; NOT ALWAYS
(Ex: you spend $10,000 on a consultant to give you a report on how much a factory would cost. This is a sunk cost, but there’s not an opportunity cost associated with this. We probably can’t sell this report to anyone else or do something else with it, so that’s money that is just gone.)
T or F: Oftentimes, for long-lived resources, there is an opportunity cost associated with sunk costs.
True
(ex: land)
changes in other cash flows resulting from the project.
side effects (one of the relevant marginal cash flows)
We (do/do not) want to include side effect costs in our analysis of the relevant cost for a project.
do
Say we’re selling phones and thinking about releasing a new model. If we sell a new model, we will most likely sell less of the old model. So, the lost sales on the old model is a ______ ______ of releasing the new model.
side effect
T or F: We do not want to include changes in net working capital in our analysis of the relevant cost for a project.
False; we DO want to include
(this includes all categories in net working capital, not just inventory. So like it includes accounts receivable, accounts payable, etc.)
Typically, we will use (more/less) net working capital at the start of a project.
more
(but then we will get it back at the end of the project)
Although, there will be projects where we see this reversed!! But, whatever order, this will typically be reversed at the end of the project (so like if we start out with less net working capital at the start, we will typically use more NWC at the end)
We start making widgets. So, we’ll need lots of parts to make them, so we’ll have an increase in inventory to start the project up. We spend $100,000 on all the inventory we need to build the widgets. Then, we’re gonna keep making widgets for 10 years, so we’re gonna have to keep that inventory high (every time we sell off widgets, we’re gonna have to buy more steel and wire, etc.) So, the money that we are spending on inventory is going to be tied up when we are doing the project. But then at the end, when the project is winding down (like we’re moving onto different things or whatnot), then we will use up the last of the inventory, and we will get that money back.
This is an example of what relevant marginal cash flow that’s used when analyzing the relevant cost of a project?
Changes in Net Working Capital
We (do/do not) want to include taxes in our analysis of what the relevant cost is for a project.
DO want to include
This is cash flow we are not going to receive. (but just like with everything else, these are our MARGINAL taxes, not our total tax bill, but any increase or decrease in our taxes that’s going to result from doing the project is a relevant cash flow to include in the relevant cost for a project.
Interest payments, dividends, and other things of that nature that are a result of financing are called _______ ______. We (do/do not) want to include this in our analysis of what the relevant cost for a project is.
^ Why?
- financing costs
- DO NOT
- because financing costs are already accounted for in our discount rate. (ex: if we count the interest costs directly, this would be like double counting once we get our PV and things like that)
What is the formula for calculating Project Cash Flows?
Project Cash Flows = Project Operating Cash Flows - Project Change in Net Working Capital - Project Capital Spending
In relation to the formula for calculating Project Cash Flows, how do you calculate the Project OPERATING Cash Flows for this formula?
Project Operating Cash Flows = any additional sales - any additional costs