Module 7: Audits Flashcards
5 flavors of audit opinions
- Unqualified: financial statements are fairly stated and there are no explanatory paragraphs needed
- Modified unqualified: unqualified but have an explanatory paragraph (e.g., discussing that company changed accounting principles or to emphasize a matter like the significant change in nature of the company’s activities)—not a big deal and not used to point out problems with company’s financial statements, except for “going concern” paragraph
- Qualified: statements as a whole are okay but there is an accounting problem worth noting (e.g., departure from GAAP or inadequate FN disclosure)
- Adverse: financial statements as a whole are screwed up—in reality company will find new auditors who think differently
- Disclaimer: when CPA can’t form an opinion (e.g., CPA’s lack of independence or bc of an inability to gather evidence)
audit opinion flavor #1: unqualified
financial statements are fairly stated and there are no explanatory paragraphs needed
audit opinion flavor #2: modified unqualified
unqualified but have an explanatory paragraph (e.g., discussing that company changed accounting principles or to emphasize a matter like the significant change in nature of the company’s activities)—not a big deal and not used to point out problems with company’s financial statements, except for “going concern” paragraph
audit opinion flavor #3: qualified
statements as a whole are okay but there is an accounting problem worth noting (e.g., departure from GAAP or inadequate FN disclosure)
audit opinion flavor #4: adverse
financial statements as a whole are screwed up—in reality company will find new auditors who think differently
audit opinion flavor #5: disclaimer
when CPA can’t form an opinion (e.g., CPA’s lack of independence or bc of an inability to gather evidence)
Who can work on an audit?
anyone
Who can sign an audit opinion?
only a CPA
3 steps of becoming a CPA
(1) education (150 hours in most states)
(2) pass uniform 4-part exam
(3) experience req (0-2 years)
Auditors gather evidence about whether the financial statements are reasonably stated by:
- Analytical review (e.g., comparing current year account balances to prior years to see if variations make sense)
- Inquiries of client (e.g., discuss with appropriate client personnel the reasons for significant variances identified in the analytical review procedures)
- Outside confirmation (e.g., sending letters to customers to verify the amount of A/R the client has recorded as being due from those customers)
- Tests of transactions (e.g., looking at warehouse reports for goods received from vendors to make sure the goods have either been paid for or that there’s an A/P recorded for the amount still owed on the goods
- Physical observation (e.g., counting the client’s inventory)
- Review of client’s internal control
In reviewing a client’s internal control, CPAs find good internal control through:
- Adequate separation of duties (most important): Sarbanes-Oxley law reqs auditor to give opinion on company’s internal control
- Separation of control of company’s assets from the accounting (don’t let cashier do bookkeeping)
- Separation of authorization of company’s transactions from control of assets (person who authorizes payment of a bill shouldn’t also be writing the check)
- Separation of operational responsibility from the accounting (keep records at home office bc ppl at the plant might have incentive to change #’s)
- Separation of info technology duties/access from user depts: don’t let sales agent enter in customer order online (might override system to allow more of credit sale than what customer is authorized for)
- Proper authorization of transactions
- Proper documentation
- Physical control over assets and records (use of fireproof safes, safety deposit box, lock inventory storeroom)
- Performance of independent checks (e.g., someone preps bank reconciliations and someone else reviews)
Adequate separation of duties, the most important factor that a CPA looks at in reviewing a client’s internal control involves:
- Separation of control of company’s assets from the accounting (don’t let cashier do bookkeeping)
- Separation of authorization of company’s transactions from control of assets (person who authorizes payment of a bill shouldn’t also be writing the check)
- Separation of operational responsibility from the accounting (keep records at home office bc ppl at the plant might have incentive to change #’s)
- Separation of info technology duties/access from user depts: don’t let sales agent enter in customer order online (might override system to allow more of credit sale than what customer is authorized for)