Module 7 - 8 Flashcards

1
Q

Bias

A

Any systematic error in the design, conduct, or analysis of a study that results in a mistaken estimate of an exposure’s effect on the risk of a health outcome.

Ex: bias can result from how people are selected to be in the study, how the disease or exposure status is classified in the study, or if there is confounding that is not accounted for in the study design or analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Selection Bias

A

A distortion in a measure of association that occurs due to how participants are selected to be in the study.

Ex: if the way in which cases and controls, or exposed and unexposed individuals, were selected is such that an apparent association is observed - even if, in reality, exposure and disease are no associated - the apparent association is due to selection bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Information Bias

A

Bias that arises from how information is obtained on the exposure or health outcome.

Ex. Information bias can occur when the means for obtaining information about the subjects in the study are flawed so that some of the information gathered regarding exposures and/or disease outcomes is incorrect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Confounding

A

A distortion of an association between an exposure and a health outcome by a third variable.

Ex. When we observe an association, we ask whether is ti causal or whether it is a result of confounding by a third factor that is both a risk factor for the disease and is associated with the putative exposure in question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Effect Modification (Effect Measure Modification)

A

When a measure of association such as a relative risk or odds ratio, changes over values of another variable

Ex. When effect measure modification is present, presenting pooled results can be misleading, and instead results should be presented separately for each level of the effect modifier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Selection Bias

A

Arises from including individuals in the study or dataset who were not supposed to be included, and excluding individuals from the study or dataset that should have been included.

This can also arise from nonresponse of potential study participants.

Participant losses during follow up - also called “emigrative selection bias”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nonrepsonders

A

It is important to keep nonresponse in a study to a minimum - people who refuse to participate differ from those who do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Emigrative Selection Bias

A

Participant losses during a study that bias the observed associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Difference between selection bias and selecting subjects

A

Selection bias impacts the internal validity of the study and the legitimacy of the inference regarding the association of exposure and the outcome. It is a systematic error in selecting subjects as part of the exposed/unexposed or case/control

Selecting subjects impacts the generalizability or external validity of the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exclusion Bias

A

Results when investigators apply different eligibility (inclusion) criteria to the cases and to the controls, with regard to which clinical conditions in the past would permit eligibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Compensation bias

A

When bias in selecting cases and control is of the same magnitude, compensating bias is achieved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

differential misclassification

A

A type of information misclassification bias in which the proportion of misclassification differs in different study groups. For example, misclassification of exposure may happen such that unexposed cases are misclassified as being exposed more often than the other way around.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nondifferential Misclassification

A

A type of information misclassification that is a problem inherent to the data collection method. It typically results in a CIR or OR that is diluted and shifted toward 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types and sources of information bias

A

Abstracting records
interviewing
surrogate interviews
Surveillance bias
Recal bias
Reporting bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What must be true of a confounder

A
  1. It must be associated with the exposure of interest
  2. It must be associated with the outcome of interest
  3. It cannot be a result of, or caused by, the exposure of interest (temporality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the approaches to handling confounding

A

Individual matching
Group matching

In the analysis of data:
Stratification
Adjustment

17
Q

Information Bias

A

Collecting incorrect values on participant’s:
Exposure status
Disease status
Covariate status (e.g. confounder

18
Q

Measurement errors are associated with

A

Continuous variables like age

19
Q

Categorical variables are associated with

A

Misclassification (e.g., sex)

20
Q

Information Bias cont

A

Cannot be eliminated with sample size
Impacts OR and RR

Incorrect recall
Inaccurate diagnostic equipment
Leading questions
Biased interviewers
Non-compliance
Inference (etiological irrelevance)

21
Q

Categorical Information Bias

A

Misclassification incorrectly specifying someone’s disease or exposure status

22
Q

Non-differential Misclassification

A

sensitivity and specificity of exposure classification is the same among cases and controls

Dilutes the true effect - moves closer to 1

23
Q

Differential Misclassification

A

Sensitivity and Specificity of exposure classification is different among cases and controls
Can go towards or away from null

24
Q

Recall Bias

A

They remember exposure status differently
Differential misclassification

25
Differential Follow-up Vigor
Asking more probing questions
26
Social Desierability
Individuals over or under report exposure status
27
Interviewer biases
preconceived notions
28
Leading questions
Asking questions in a way that may bias the answer
29
Blinding
Limiting knowledge of treatment status e.g.: participant blinding: Placebo Blinding researcher Blinding analyst (triple blind)
30
Non compliance
Intent to treat: Ignore non compliance and analyze based on initial assignment
31
Error in inference
“Error in inference” in induction refers to mistakes made when drawing general conclusions from specific observations. These errors can occur in various ways: Types of Inductive Errors Inadequate Samples: Drawing conclusions from limited or unrepresentative data. Overgeneralization: Ignoring contradictions or variations in observed phenomena and forming conclusions that fail to consider all relevant contexts. Unwarranted Assumptions: Treating debatable claims as true without providing evidence. Focus on Irrelevant Information: Diverting attention from factors directly related to the conclusion
32
Necessary and Sufficient Cause
A factor that is both necessary and sufficient for producing a disease. Without that factor, the disease never develops and in the presence of that factor, the disease always develops. RARE
33
Necessary but no sufficient
When each factor is necessary but not in itself sufficient to cause the disease. Multiple factors are required - often in a temporal sequence Ex. H Pylori and stomach cancer
34
Sufficient but not necessary
when the factor can produce the disease but so can other factors that are acting alone. Lukemia RARE
35
Neither sufficient nor necessary
When a factor is neither sufficient or necessary to produce disease - most reflective of natural disease and conditions.
36
What are the 9 guidelines for judging whether an observed association is causal
1. Temporal relationship 2. Strength of the association 3. Dose-response relationship 4. Replication of the findings 5. Biologic plausibility 6. Consideration of alternate explanations 7. Cessation of exposure 8. Specificity of the association
37
How is "cause of a disease" defined
An event , condition, or characteristic that preceded the disease and without which the disease either would not have occurred at all or would not have occurred until some later time.