Module 6-Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a Tort

A

 A tort is a civil wrong that occurs when someone (“D”) causes harm/loss to another person or their legally protectable interests (“P”) intentionally, carelessly, or as a result of their dangerous activities, defective products or inadequate warnings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reasonable Person Standard

A

 Reasonable person standard:
 A purportedly objective standard judged by what a hypothetical “reasonable person” should do under similar circumstances.
 But note: a “reasonable person” is not just reasonable. Plaintiffs’ lawyers will always work to convince a jury she is very cautious, prudent, calm, responsible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Respondant Superior Doctrine

A

 Respondeat Superior doctrine
 A master (e.g., employer) may be held vicariously liable for the torts of his servant (e.g., employee) done while acting within the scope of his employment and motivated in part to benefit employer.
 Recall: Much harder to hold employer variously liable for acts of Independent Contractors (b/c employers have less right to control how IC acts than how Employee acts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Negligence law

A

 Negligence law imposes liability where D’s fails to live up to required duty of care: duty to act as “reasonable person” would act under similar circumstances.
 Most common form of tort recovery; does not involve intentional misconduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Negligence Elements

A

 Negligence actions require proof of the following
essential elements:
 Duty to follow a standard of care in respect of P
 Breach of that Duty
 Causation (Factual Cause & Legal Cause)
 Damages (harm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Duty

A

 P’s must prove that Defendant has a legal “duty” to be careful in respect of the plaintiff.
 Duty helps determine which persons/injuries are within the scope of liability. No duty = No liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Breach

A

 “Breach” refers to violation of the applicable standard of care
 Breach usually determined by applying “REASONABLE PERSON STANDARD”
 Ultimate question: Did D act as a reasonably prudent person would have acted under similar circumstances?
 Enhanced standard for experts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Breack the role of Economic Efficiency

A

 Duty to provide against resulting injuries is function of variables:
(1) The probability of loss; (P)
(2) the gravity of the foreseeable resulting injury; (L)
(3) the burden of providing additional care (B)
 Costs, Feasible Alternatives, Convenience, Costs to Society of Losing Risk-Producing Activity

 Liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Negligence Defenses

A

 Express assumption of risk: usually occurs when a person signs a written waiver before
engaging in a dangerous activity.
 To be valid, it must be clear, unambiguous and voluntary. (See Kurashige)

 Implied assumption of risk can be defense even where no advance written waiver is
signed.

 Comparative Negligence:  In most states, Plaintiffs own negligence can reduce the plaintiff’s recovery by the percentage of responsibility for the injury attributable to the plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tortious Interference

A

 Type 1: Wrongful interference w/ a contractual relationship
 Requires plaintiff to show:
 Valid and enforceable contract between A and B
 C must have actual or constructive knowledge that the A-B contract exists
 C intentionally and improperly induces A or B to breach K by non-performance.
 Often used when a company wrongfully poaches another’s contractual counterparties,
including buyers, suppliers, etc. (see Pennzoil v. Texaco)

 Type 2: Wrongful interference w/ a prospective business advantage/relation
 Requires plaintiff to show:
 D intentionally and improperly interfered with prospective contractual relationship that plaintiff sought to develop with 3rd party, causing P’s economic loss by preventing a contract from being formed.
 Often used when business wrongfully interferes w/ another business’ future customers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Unfair Competition

A

 State common law prohibits many forms of unfair competition & false advertising:
 Breach of Warranty
 Right of Publicity: suit for commercial use of name/likeness w/o permission

 Federal Trade Commission Act: declares “unfair methods of competition in or
affecting commerce” to be unlawful. 15 USC § 45(a)(1). Enforced by FTC in
cases of deceptive pricing (e.g., bait & switch), false testimonials/simulations.
 Lanham Act: forbids use of any false or misleading description or
representation in connection with goods or services that (1) is likely to cause
consumer confusion/mistake/deception, or (2) misrepresents nature,
characteristics, qualities or origin of goods/services. 15 USC § 1125.
Enforceable by “any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be
damaged by such an act.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defamation

A

Tort of defamation can be used to seek compensation from one who (1)
communicates to a 3rd party (2) false statements of fact about another person (3)
that causes harm to subject’s reputation by exposing them to hatred, ridicule, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Products Liability

A

 Businesses are often held liable for injuries caused by products they sell. Theories of liability include
Br/K, breach of warranty, negligence & strict liability

 Many states adopt liability approach of Restatement (2nd) of Torts:
 “(1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or
consumer or to his property is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate
user or consumer, or to his property, if (a) the seller is engaged in the business of selling such a
product, and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial
change in the condition in which it is sold.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Causation

A

 Plaintiff must provide evidence that the defendant’s conduct was the factual
and legal cause of plaintiff’s damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types of Civil Tort Damages-Compensatory Damages

A

 Compensatory Damages
 Designed to restore injured party, as nearly as possible, to position he would have been in, had it not been for
wrong of other party (i.e., status before the injury)
 Available for pecuniary losses & non-pecuniary losses:
 Pecuniary Losses: Includes damage to property, out of pocket medical expenses, future medical expenses, past and future lost wages, etc.
 Non-pecuniary losses: Includes past and future pain & suffering, humiliation, anxiety.
 Plaintiffs still have duty to mitigate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Types of Civil Tort Damages- Nominal Damages

A

 Nominal Damages
 Symbolic award given to P who cannot prove actual damages. It is designed to the vindicate legal principle at issue (i.e., D violated P’s rights), but can also serve as “hook” for punitive or attorney’s fee award.

17
Q

Types of Civil Tort Damages-Punitive Damages

A

 Punitive Damages
 Designed to punish tortfeasor for particularly bad conduct (e.g., actions taken with malice) & provide deterrence.
 Due Process clause allows Courts to review awards
 Degree of reprehensibility of D’s misconduct
 Disparity (Ratio) between actual/potential harm suffered and punitive award (>1:10 are often suspect)
 Diff. b/w jury award & civil penalties imposed/authorized in comparable cases.