Module 4 - Tests of Details of Balance Flashcards
Methodology for desigining Tests of D.O.B for AR
What are the phases for designing tests of D.O.B. for A/R
Phase 1
- Identify client’s business risks affecting A/R
- Set performance materiality and assess inherent risk for A/R
- Asses Control risk for sales and collection cycle
Phase 2
Design and perform tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions (last module)
Phase 3
- Design and perform analytical procedures
- Design and tests of DOB
What considerations are made when assessing the client’s business risks for A/R?
- Use of analytical procedures to indicate increased risk
- Evaluation of inherent risk and planned evidence based on economic/industry conditions
What is performance materiality?
Auditor decides preliminary judgement about materiality for entire financial statements, and then allocates to significant balance sheet account
Auditing standards assumption for revenue recogintion:
Auditors must normally identify a specific fraud risk for revenue recognition
This will affect the auditor’s assessmentof inherent risk for: Existence, sales cutoff, and sales returns/allowances
Methodology for desigining Tests of D.O.B for AR
What is the importance of phase 2 for designing tests of DOB?
Weak controls/inefficient substantive testing will increase the need for tests of details of balance
Relationship between sales (transaction) and A/R balace


Relationship between cash receipts (transaction) and A/R balance:


When are substantive analytics used throughout the audit?
Phase 1: Planning analytics (provides no assurance, risk assessment)
Phase 3: Substantive analytical procedure (usually done after balance sheet date to test all transactions/balances)
Phase 4: Part of completing audit
What are the 4 steps to performing analytical procedures?
- Develop expectation
- Determine threshold
- Calculate differences between expected and actual
- Investigate reasons for differences over threshold and draw conclusion
What analytical procedures would be performed by product line to detect possible overstatement/understatement of sales and accounts receivable?
- Compare gross margin % with previous years
- Compare sales by month over time
- Compare sales returns and allowances as % of gross sales** with previous years
Important to use % to smooth the results to the dependent variable (sales)
What are some analytical procedures might be performed to indicate misstatements in accounts receivable and related income statement accounts?
Compare individual customer balances over a stated amount with previous years
What are some analytical procedures that could be performed to indicate uncollectible A/R that has not been realized?
Compare bad debt expense as % of gross sales with previous years
What are some analytical procedures that may be performed to indicate an over/understatement of allowance for uncollectible accounts?
- Compare # of days of A/R outstanding with previous years
- Compare allowance for uncollectble accounts as % of A/R with previous years
Auditor’s use this tool to help in designing tests of details of balances (phase 3):
Evidence planning worksheet
auditor ranks strength of factors that determine planned detection risk for each balance related objective
What is PDR and what are some factors that affect it?
PDR = Risk that auditor will fail to detect material misstatement
- Inherent risk, control risk, and acceptable audit risk have inverse relationship with PDR (high control risk = low PDR)
What is the relationship of planned detection risk and tests of details of balances?
PDR has inverse relationship with tests of DOB: High PDR = lower amounts of tests of DOB
What is the first step an auditor should take when designing tests of details of balances for Accounts Receivable?
Auditor ensures amounts from aged trial balance correctly add and agree (foot) to the master file and general ledger
Aged trial balance = list of individual customer balances included in master file with details of how long outstanding
What is the most important test of details of balances for accounts receivable?
Confirmation : Ensure sales occured and balance of receivables exist (existence and accuracy)
Existence of A/R outweighs other audit objectives because of risk of overstatement of sales
What are the audit objectives the auditor must factor in when determining the tests of DOB for A/R?
What tests of DOB would be performed to satisfy the objective?
A/R are accurate: Confirmation
A/R are properly classified (Current/non-current): Aged trial balance
Cutoff for A/R is correct: inspection of sales doc
A/R stated at realizable value: recalculation of BDE
Client has rights to A/R: inspect documents
A/R presentation and disclosed properly: Presentation/disclosure checklist
Requirement standards of Confirmations for A/R:
Confirmations for A/R required in U.S. (not international)
Not required when:
- Gross A/R is immaterial
- Expect low response rate
- Combined level of inherent risk/control risk is low enough that other substantive evidence will be sufficient
Positive confirmation vs. negative confirmation
What are the differences?
Positive confirmation
Ask customer to respond to confirmation if amount is accurate or inaccurate
negative confirmation
Only ask customer to respond if debtor disagrees with stated amount
Positive confirmation vs. negative confirmation
Which is more reliable and why?
Positive confirmation is more reliable because auditor can perform follow-up procedures
Negative: failure to respond will be assumed as correct
What are these types of positive confirmations:
- Blank confirmation
- Invoice confirmation
Blank confirmation: Ask customer to “fill in” amount they think they ow
Invoice confirmation: Ask customer to respond on individual invoice amount (not whole balance)
Auditing standards with positive confirmations:
Auditing standards require followup procedures for non-responses from customers when positive confirmations are used.
- Second or third requests
- Look at subsequent cash receipts
- Look at sales invoices and shipping documents
What four factors should auditors consider when evaluating the results of confirmation procedures and alternative procedures?
- Reliability of confirmation and alternative procedures
- the nature of the exceptions, including implications (quantitative and qualitative)
- The audit evidence provided by other procedures
- Whether additional audit evidence is needed