Module 4 - Tests of Details of Balance Flashcards
Methodology for desigining Tests of D.O.B for AR
What are the phases for designing tests of D.O.B. for A/R
Phase 1
- Identify client’s business risks affecting A/R
- Set performance materiality and assess inherent risk for A/R
- Asses Control risk for sales and collection cycle
Phase 2
Design and perform tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions (last module)
Phase 3
- Design and perform analytical procedures
- Design and tests of DOB
What considerations are made when assessing the client’s business risks for A/R?
- Use of analytical procedures to indicate increased risk
- Evaluation of inherent risk and planned evidence based on economic/industry conditions
What is performance materiality?
Auditor decides preliminary judgement about materiality for entire financial statements, and then allocates to significant balance sheet account
Auditing standards assumption for revenue recogintion:
Auditors must normally identify a specific fraud risk for revenue recognition
This will affect the auditor’s assessmentof inherent risk for: Existence, sales cutoff, and sales returns/allowances
Methodology for desigining Tests of D.O.B for AR
What is the importance of phase 2 for designing tests of DOB?
Weak controls/inefficient substantive testing will increase the need for tests of details of balance
Relationship between sales (transaction) and A/R balace
Relationship between cash receipts (transaction) and A/R balance:
When are substantive analytics used throughout the audit?
Phase 1: Planning analytics (provides no assurance, risk assessment)
Phase 3: Substantive analytical procedure (usually done after balance sheet date to test all transactions/balances)
Phase 4: Part of completing audit
What are the 4 steps to performing analytical procedures?
- Develop expectation
- Determine threshold
- Calculate differences between expected and actual
- Investigate reasons for differences over threshold and draw conclusion
What analytical procedures would be performed by product line to detect possible overstatement/understatement of sales and accounts receivable?
- Compare gross margin % with previous years
- Compare sales by month over time
- Compare sales returns and allowances as % of gross sales** with previous years
Important to use % to smooth the results to the dependent variable (sales)
What are some analytical procedures might be performed to indicate misstatements in accounts receivable and related income statement accounts?
Compare individual customer balances over a stated amount with previous years
What are some analytical procedures that could be performed to indicate uncollectible A/R that has not been realized?
Compare bad debt expense as % of gross sales with previous years
What are some analytical procedures that may be performed to indicate an over/understatement of allowance for uncollectible accounts?
- Compare # of days of A/R outstanding with previous years
- Compare allowance for uncollectble accounts as % of A/R with previous years
Auditor’s use this tool to help in designing tests of details of balances (phase 3):
Evidence planning worksheet
auditor ranks strength of factors that determine planned detection risk for each balance related objective
What is PDR and what are some factors that affect it?
PDR = Risk that auditor will fail to detect material misstatement
- Inherent risk, control risk, and acceptable audit risk have inverse relationship with PDR (high control risk = low PDR)