Module 4 Flashcards

Works: Independent- Derivative- Inspired

1
Q

What requirement comes after the fixation requirement?

A

Originality requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the originality requirement mean within the UK and USA?

A

It is mostly focused on the definition of original works which is put in the for example copyright design and patent act from the 1988.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the meaning of the originality requirement in continental Europe approach?

A

As a requirement for protection subject matter it might be the result of human creative process which has also individual character.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who put simply the difference between individuality, creativity and originality?

A

Mark Rose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did Mark Rose interpret individuality and creativity?

A

As a kind of romantic authorship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the objective approach of copyright?

A

The meaning we use for originality requirement in common law countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

With what doctrine was the objective approach of copyright associated with?

A

With the doctrine of skills and labour and the concept of sweat of the brow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the subjective approach of copyright?

A

The second approach, more focused on the individual stamp of author that work is required to be incorporated rather than the originality itself like in the objective approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When was presented one of the most extreme variants of the objective approach?

A

In the decision of English Court in 1916 in the case University of London press vs. University Tutorial press.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did the court held in the case University of London press vs. University Tutorial press?

A

It held that the copyright act doesn’t require that the expression must be in an original or novel form but the work must not be copied from another work, that it should originate from the author.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who described the purposes of copyright protection?

A

Paul Goldstein.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

To what is copyright in its very objective approach reduced to?

A

To a very simple task to examine who is the author of the work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Where was introduced the alternative interpretation of originality and what is it called?

A

In the US and it is called the doctrine of Sweat of the borrow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In what decision can be found the classic definition of the doctrine of Sweat of the borrow?

A

In Jeweller’s circular decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is not required according to the doctrine of Sweat of the borrow?

A

It is not required that the idea is new because an idea is not covered by the copyright at all. The author must have expended skill judgement and labour or selection judgement and experience or even labour, skill and capital in creating the work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the two cumulative requirements according to the doctrine of Sweat of the borrow?

A
  • the work must originate from the author

- there must have been a minimum investment by author of skill, judgement or labour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Do both requirements of the doctrine of Sweat of the borrow have to be met at the same time and it which case was it confirmed?

A

Yes. It was confirmed in the case the Bill Trading vs. Bill Hitch.

18
Q

In what case was some guidance provided?

A

In Guild vs. Eskander Ltd.

19
Q

What did the court held in the Guild vs. Eskander Ltd case?

A

A copy which incorporates some minor alterations of a work is no longer protected under copyright.

20
Q

What is the principle stated in Interlego case?

A

The skill and labour must not be so trivial that it could be characterized as a purely mechanical exercise.

21
Q

What is the biggest flow of the doctrine of Sweat of the borrow?

A

The only defense to infringement was independent creation. The subsequent compiler was not entitled to take one word of information previously published but rather had to independently work out the matter for himself sous to arrive at the same result from the same common sources of information.

22
Q

In what case was the doctrine of Sweat of the borrow criticized?

A

In the case of five publications by the Supreme Court in US in 1991.

23
Q

What did the Supreme Court held in the case of five publications in 1991?

A

It held that the facts contained in existing works may freely be copied, because copyright protects only the elements that owe their origin to compiler- the selection, coordination and arrangement of facts.

24
Q

What is a major concern when it comes to interpretation of originality?

A

That it may lead to the aesthetic evaluation of work itself.

25
Q

Describe the Bleistein vs. Donaldson case.

A

26
Q

What was the question that Jane Ginsburg asked?

A

She asked if the work might embodied the author’s persona and then how does it follow from determining the work is him that is also his.

27
Q

What is the most difficult part of the copyright legal system?

A

To find any nick interpretation of originality.

28
Q

How is the problem of originality solved at the EU level?

A

There is no sustain like general directed from copyright issue the harmonization is so cold pointed and relate only to very detailed problem of copyright. The originality requirement might have some potential to integrated internal market. In theory, divergent requirements for the level of originality by member states have the potential of posing barriers to intra-community trade. In practice, seems to be no convincing evidence to support this.

29
Q

What is the problem with EU competences in respect to the subject matter of copyright?

A

The absence of one harmonized definition of what is and shall be protected within copyright realm.

30
Q

What specific subject matter has become the major concern of the European Commission?

A

Software.

31
Q

Is there a horizontal harmonization of the concept of subject matter and originality requirement adopted by the commission?

A

No.

32
Q

Which directives regulate the computer program and databases?

A

The directive from 2009 on the legal protection of computer program and the directive of 1996 under legal protection of database.

33
Q

What do the directive from 2009 and the directive from 1996 stipulate?

A

They stipulate that work like computer program, databases and photograph are considered to be eligible for copyright protection if they represent the author on intellectual creation.

34
Q

Which five landmark cases did the Court of Justice interpret and elaborate on the precise contours of EU originality standards between 2009 and 2012?

A
  • Infopaq international from 2009
  • BSA from 2010
  • Premier League Case from 2011
  • Eva Maria Painer case from 2011
  • Football dataco case from 2012
35
Q

Summarize the precise contour elaborated by the Court of Justice.

A
  • under EU copyright law the required originality standard is the authors on intellectual creation.
  • we can conclude that the authors on intellectual creation is present when author can exercise free and creative choices and put their personal stamp on the work.
  • it is not wrongful the originality requirement to be made when an expression is determined by technical or functional rule such as when there is only one way to express the idea or the expression predetermine by specific goal or concern by narrow rules that leave no space for free and creative choices.
36
Q

What should copyright reward?

A

An original expression.

37
Q

What does the Rogers vs. Koons case show?

A

Some difficulties with the distinction idea expression.

38
Q

Describe the Rogers vs. Koons case.

A

39
Q

Describe the case about Superman.

A

40
Q

Describe the case about the architectural work in Krakow.

A