Module 4 Flashcards

1
Q

What does the dorsal stream do, and what region of the brain processes information?

A

AKA the cortical system pathway, the ‘where’ system.

It is responsible for perceptions of spatial location and relations of objects. Processing happens in the posterior parietal cortex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the ventral stream do, and what region of the brain processes information?

A

AKA the visual cortex pathway, the ‘what’ system.

It is responsible for perceptions of qualities and features of objects. Processing happens in the inferior temporal cortex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was DB able to implicitly move his eyes/reach somewhat correctly in his bad field of vision (blindsight)?

A

Because information can still get to the brain via sub-cortical pathways. Either it goes to the primary visual cortex, or to retinal maps in the midbrain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the difference between the ‘what vs. where’ system and the ‘what vs. how’ system?

A

The purpose of the ventral system stays the same between the two models. The ‘how’ system changes the focus on the dorsal stream, where the focus is now on goal-directed actions, and the purpose of visual input.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does patient DF perform in perceptual and motor tasks?

A

Patient DF: has visual form agnosia, so she has problems with the ventral stream (perception).

Posting task: she has trouble matching her card to the slot position before the movement, but is able to correctly insert the card once she starts moving.

Grip aperture task: she shows the correct grip adjustments to smaller and larger objects when making a reaching movement. But, she cannot calibrate her grip when asked to estimate her grip width.

Shape recognition: able to judge the size of a shape only when grasping it, but unable to judge the size by just looking at it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does patient RV perform in perceptual and motor tasks?

A

Patient RV: has optic ataxia, and lesions to the posterior parietal cortex. So, he has problems with the dorsal stream (motor).

Posting task: very good at estimating/matching his card position to the slot position. However, he has problems with accuracy while performing the movement.

Grip aperture task: unable to calibrate grip while performing a reaching movement, but very good at estimating grip aperture prior to movement.

Shape recognition: unable to judge the size of a shape only when grasping it, but is able to judge the size by just looking at it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Haffenden and Goodale manipulate the Ebbinghaus illusion? What were their findings?

A

They tested the regular illusion (i.e. same sized middle circles surrounded by either small or large circles) to make them look different, but they were actually the same. Then, they manipulated the size of the middle circles to make them look the same, but they were actually different (i.e. smaller middle circle surrounded by small circles, larger middle circle surrounded by large circles).

Findings: in all conditions, the ventral/perceptual stream is tricked, and the dorsal/motor stream is not tricked.

Altered illusion: People’s estimations of grip aperture were the same between conditions, but grip aperture changed when reaching out to grasp the circles.

Normal illusion: People’s estimations of grip aperture were different between conditions (larger for the small surrounding circles, smaller for the large surrounding circles), but grip aperture was similar when reaching out to grasp the circles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did Westwood and Goodale use the flanker illusion to separate dorsal and ventral stream reliance?

A

Flanker illusion: placing a smaller or larger object next to an object of focus (that stays the same size). People are asked to reach out and grab to focus object. If there is no illusion effect, the grip aperture difference between the 2 conditions will be 0. Otherwise, an illusion exists.

Manipulations: They did reaching tasks with visual information always available, and reaching tasks when vision is occluded (image is never brought back after the initial showing). They also did trials where there was a delay between the initial viewing of the objects and the movement cue (for both vision and occlusion).

Results: for both vision trial blocks, there was a negligible illusion effect. For both occlusion trial blocks, there was a significant illusion effect.

Conclusion: dorsal stream needs visual information in real time. If made to rely on memory, we rely on the ventral stream for movement tasks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In what conditions can performance be improved with delays and occlusion (Milner study)?

A

When the person has dorsal stream damage. They have better performance in perceptual tasks, where they rely on the ventral stream.

Perceptual size matching of an object is good. When reaching out to grasp an object with a delay, grip aperture varies a lot, because they are relying on their damaged stream. In the pantomime trials with a delay, performance is good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the double-step paradigm?

A

When movements are smoothly adjusted to a ‘double step’ of a target, outside of conscious awareness.

Pellisson et al. study - when target jumping is timed with saccades, you can hide the second jump of the target. Verbal reports if the object moved or not are up to chance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is saccadic suppression?

A

A reduction in visual sensitivity during saccadic eye movements. This reduces our awareness of ‘blur’ and visual flow so the world seems stable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What experiments did Crossman et al. perform? What were the results?

A

First experiment: 2 blocks of trials. Instructions were given to either ‘GO’ to the target if it jumped, or ‘STOP’ the movement if the target jumped. People were successful in doing both.

Second experiment: 2 differently colored objects - always aiming for just one of them. Instructions were given to either ‘GO’ to the target if the targets switched colors, or ‘STOP’ the movement if the targets switched colors. People were successful in doing both. However, success in the ‘GO’ condition was lower compared to the jumping experiment, as color changes are slower for humans to process compared to location changes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do the color switching and target jumping results differ?

A

The hand paths were different between experiments: location changes trigger the automatic process (dorsal stream), while color changes don’t (ventral stream). This is seen as participants automatically deviate towards the target in the location jump trials, while the corrections were late in the color change trials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is the automatic process only triggered during movements?

A

Day and Lyon study: automatic deviations are present in the reach tasks. Reach (-) trials showed an initial direction towards the new target location, but then corrected to move to the opposite one.

These deviations and corrections were not observed in the simple tracking task (just selecting a response).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can the automatic process be disrupted?

A

If the posterior parietal cortex is probed with TMS during movement initiation, or if the posterior parietal cortex is damaged. In both cases, people will reach straight ahead first, and make a whole separate movement to reach the target that has changed its position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

During target ‘blanking’ tasks, what does your brain default to thinking?

A
  1. Continued visibility of a target means position constancy.
  2. Visual discontinuity is associated with spatial displacement.
17
Q

How did Deubel et al. measure the effects of ‘blanking’ targets?

A

People can always tell if a target moves when it blanks at the same time - it’s not up to chance. So, they introduced 2 objects in the periphery (target and distractor). Either one will move, and one, both, or neither will blank. Participants are asked to report which one moved.

Success is high when either of the objects blank and move at the same time. Success is low when one moves and one blanks; people always think the one that blanks is the one that moves. This proves the default assumptions of the brain.

18
Q

What happened to target/distractor jumping/blanking results when a pointing movement was introduced? (Chua and Enns)

A

Same protocol as Deubel study. Now, people are pointing to the moving objects.

Verbal reports were still fooled: correctness is high when either of the objects blank and move at the same time. correctness is low when one moves and one blanks; people always think the one that blanks is the one that moves.

Pointing movements are made to the correctly moving objects, but people still perceive the blanking object to be the one that moves.

Second part: when the target moves, abort the movement. Verbal reports and pointing movement results were the same as the previous experiment.

Proportions of reversed commands: people were successful at aborting movements when the target both jumped and blanked. People were successful at not aborting when the distractor jumped and blanked. People incorrectly aborted their movements when the distractor moved, but the target blanked. People incorrectly did not abort when the target moved but the distractor blanked.

19
Q

What are the conclusions from the Chua and Enns study?

A

Verbal reports are fooled by the illusion, but pointing movements are not.

The blanked object always appears to be the one that jumped.

Dorsal system computations don’t rely on information that reaches conscious awareness.

20
Q

How is it proven that the dorsal/motor system receives information before information reaches conscious awareness? (Cressman study)

A

By visual masking and ‘priming’. A small object either pointing right, left, or neutrally is presented right before a larger object pointing left or right. The prime is hidden, and people don’t consciously know it is there.

RT task: if you are primed in the same direction as the target, RTs are faster. RTs are slower when the prime and target are opposite. No RT differences if the prime is neutral.

Reaching task: when prime and stimulus match (i.e. left prime and left stimulus), hand path smoothly goes to the corresponding (left) box. When given a neutral prime and a directional target, hand path aims for the center first then corrects to the right/left box. When given opposite prime and stimulus, hand initially goes in the direction of the prime, then corrects to the direction of the stimulus.

Conclusion: the dorsal stream is responding to the prime information even when we don’t know it is there. There is a dissociation between conscious perception and action.

21
Q

How does the 4 dots study explain the dissociation between conscious perception and action?

A

People were faster at reaching for the correctly sized shape in the unconscious condition (the 4 dots surrounding the circle stayed on after the shapes were displayed). Even though people had no conscious awareness of what the target looked like, their motor systems responded faster than when they DID have conscious awareness.