MODULE 3 Flashcards

1
Q

What are external aids of interpretation in statutes?

A

External aids are resources outside the statute that help in understanding its meaning and intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

True or False: External aids are part of the statutory text.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name one type of external aid used in the interpretation of statutes.

A

Legislative history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fill in the blank: ___________ refers to the official records of legislative debates and committee reports.

A

Legislative history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the purpose of using external aids in statutory interpretation?

A

To clarify ambiguous language and ascertain legislative intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Multiple Choice: Which of the following is NOT considered an external aid? A) Legislative history B) Dictionary C) Judicial precedent D) Academic commentary

A

C) Judicial precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

True or False: External aids can include the context of the statute’s enactment.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What role do dictionaries play in the interpretation of statutes?

A

Dictionaries provide definitions of terms used in the statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fill in the blank: ___________ refers to documents that explain the purpose and intent behind a statute.

A

Explanatory notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the significance of case law as an external aid?

A

Case law helps in understanding how courts have interpreted similar statutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Multiple Choice: Which external aid would help clarify the intent behind a statute? A) Dictionary B) Judicial opinion C) Legislative debates D) All of the above

A

D) All of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

True or False: External aids are only used when the statutory language is clear.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the effect of using external aids on the interpretation of statutes?

A

They provide context and can influence the outcome of legal interpretations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fill in the blank: ___________ are publications by legal scholars that analyze statutes and their implications.

A

Commentaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by ‘historical context’ in statutory interpretation?

A

Historical context refers to the social, political, and economic conditions at the time of the statute’s enactment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Multiple Choice: Which is an example of an external aid? A) The text of the statute B) The legislative intent C) Judicial opinions D) None of the above

A

B) The legislative intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

True or False: External aids can be used in conjunction with internal aids.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are ‘extrinsic materials’ in the context of statutory interpretation?

A

Extrinsic materials are documents or resources outside the statute that provide insight into its meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Fill in the blank: ___________ is a type of external aid that includes reports from commissions or committees.

A

Commission reports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the relevance of international treaties as external aids?

A

International treaties may provide context or influence the interpretation of domestic statutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Multiple Choice: Which of the following is NOT an external aid? A) Legislative history B) Dictionary C) Statutory text D) Judicial decisions

A

C) Statutory text

22
Q

True or False: External aids have the same weight in interpretation as the statutory text.

23
Q

What are ‘contemporary sources’ in statutory interpretation?

A

Contemporary sources refer to resources available at the time the statute was enacted, including newspapers or public records.

24
Q

Fill in the blank: ___________ refers to the interpretations of statutes by courts over time.

A

Judicial interpretation

25
What is the function of legislative debates as external aids?
They provide insight into the discussions and considerations that shaped the statute.
26
Statements of Objects and Reasons should not be considered an external aid to interpretation. Case
Ashwini Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Bose case, Chief Justice Patanjali Shastri expressed that the Statements of Objects and Reasons should not be considered an external aid to interpretation. This was because these statements are presented during the bill’s processing, and the bill may undergo several changes during that period, making the statements subject to amendments
27
State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Bose
State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Bose, Justice S. R. Das took the Statements of Objects and Reasons into account to assess the socio-political and economic context of the introduced bill, while still acknowledging the view expressed in the Ashwini Kumar case.
28
Indira Sawhney v. Union of India
Indira Sawhney v. Union of India, the Supreme Court referred to a speech by Dr B. R. Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly while interpreting Article 16(4) of the Indian Constitution. The Court held that although Parliamentary debate is not binding on the courts, it can be considered to understand the context, background and legislative intent.
29
S.R. Chaudhuri v State of Punjab and others, (2001) 7 SCC 126
has stated that it is a settled position that debates in the Constituent Assembly may be relied upon as an aid to interpret a Constitutional provision because it is the function of the Court to find out the intention of the framers of the Constitution. (Para 33)
30
K.S. Paripoornan v State of Kerala and others, AIR 1995 SC 1012)
speeches made by the mover of the Bill or Minister may be referred to for the purpose of finding out the object intended to be achieved by the Bill. (
31
(Devadoss (dead) by L. Rs, v. Veera Makali Amman Koil Athalur, AIR 1998 SC 750.)
So far as Statement of Objects and Reasons, accompanying a legislative bill is concerned, it is permissible to refer to it for understanding the background, the antecedent state of affairs, the surrounding circumstances in relation to the statute and the evil which the statute sought to remedy. But, it cannot be used to ascertain the true meaning and effect of the substantive provision of the statute.
32
Rosy and another v State of Kerala and others, (2000) 2 SCC 230
The Supreme Court in Rosy and another v State of Kerala and others, (2000) 2 SCC 230 considered Law Commission of India, 41st Report for interpretation of Section 200 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.
33
S.P. Gupta v Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 149,
S.P. Gupta v Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 149, it was stated - “The interpretation of every statutory provision must keep pace with changing concepts and values and it must, to the extent to which its language permits or rather does not prohibit, suffer adjustments through judicial interpretation so as to accord with the requirement of the fast changing society which is undergoing rapid social and economic transformation … It is elementary that law does not operate in a vacuum
34
Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Scientific invention
State v. J. S. Chawdhry, which involved Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. This section specifically mentioned handwriting experts but did not include typewriting experts since typewriters were invented after the statute’s enactment. However, in the case at hand, the party representing the state sought to rely on the opinion of typewriting experts. The Supreme Court had previously held that the opinions of typewriting experts were not admissible. Nevertheless, in this particular case, the Supreme Court departed from its earlier view and deemed such opinions admissible.
35
State of Madras v. A. Vaidyanath Iyer,
the accused, an income-tax officer, was charged with accepting a bribe. The trial court sentenced him to six months of rigorous imprisonment. However, the High Court acquitted the accused upon appeal, suggesting that he may have borrowed money instead of accepting it as a bribe.The Supreme Court, in its examination of Section 4 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, ruled that if there is evidence that the accused accepted gratification in any form other than legal remuneration, it shall be presumed that such gratification was accepted as a bribe, unless proven otherwise. This provision was considered in pari materia with the Indian Evidence Act 1872, where the words ‘shall presume’ corresponded to the words ‘it shall be presumed’ in the Prevention of Corruption Act. Consequently, the Supreme Court overturned the High Court’s decision and found the accused guilty.
36
M. V. Elisabeth v. Harwan Investment and Trading Pvt. Ltd.,
the Supreme Court took a different stance from the English courts when interpreting the phrase “damage caused by a ship” under Section 443 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The court expanded the meaning of the phrase to include physical damage and damage caused to the cargo within the ship.
37
Ramlal v State of Rajasthan, (2001) 1 SCC 175.
Courts also refer passages and materials from text books and articles and papers published in the journals. These external aids are very useful tools not only for the proper and correct interpretation or construction of statutory provision, but also for understanding the object of the statute, the mischief sought to be remedied by it, circumstances in which it was enacted and many other relevant matters.
38
Pepper v. Hart (1993)
Pepper v. Hart (1993) “The reference to Parliamentary material should be permitted as an aid to the construction of legislation which is ambiguous or obscure or literal meaning of which leads to absurdity.” .
39
Chiranjit Lal Chowdhury v. UOI (1951)
Fazal Ali, J., admitted Parliamentary History including the speech of the minister introducing the bill as evidence of the circumstances which necessitated the passing of the Act.
40
Keats v. Lewis (1911)
In the construction of statutes it is, of course at all times and all circumstances permissible to have regard to the state of things existing at the time the statute was passed and to the evils which appear from the provisions, it was designed to remedy.
41
Commr. of Income Tax, M.P. v Socha Devi (1958)
Commr. of Income Tax, M.P. v Socha Devi (1958) When the words used are ambiguous that they would stand to be examined and construed in the light of the surrounding circumstances.
42
R v. Ireland (1997)
The psychiatric injury which was caused by silent telephone calls was held to amount to “assault” or “bodily harm” under sections 20 and 47 of the Offence Against Person Act,1861 in the light of the current scientific appreciation of the link between the body and psychiatric injury.
43
R v. Fellows (1997)
The data stored in a computer disc, a technique not known in 1978 amounts to “indecent photograph” within the meaning of section 1 of the Protection of Children Act,1978 which penalizes taking or distribution of indecent photograph of children under the age of sixteen.
44
Bacchan Singh v. State of Punjab (1982)
SC, while upholding the constitutionality of death penalty, observed that Constitutional Law also raises economic, social, moral and political problems. And along with the history, the recent developments shall also be taken into account
45
Express Newspaper (P) Ltd. v. UOI (1985)
Reference to the decisions of the US SC for interpreting Art.19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India is allowed.
46
The courts in India will have to build their own jurisprudence though they may receive light from whatever source it comes. They can’t surrender their judgement and accept as valid in India whatever has been decided in England.
Bhagwati J. in National Textile Workers Unoin v. P.R. Ramakrishnan (1983)
47
Ahmedabad Pvt. P.T. Association v. Adm. Officer
It was observed that the word “employee” defined in section 2(e) of Payment of Gratuity Act is to be construed by referring to other Labour Enactments dealing with the same subject.
48
SC the court quoted the meaning of the word ‘Propagate’ from the Oxford and Century dictionaries.
Rev. Stainslaus v. State of M.P. (1977)
49
While it may be permissible to refer to dictionaries to find out the meaning in which a word is capable of being used or understood in common parlance, the unrestricted reference to the dictionaries should be avoided and the well known canon of construction that the meaning of the words and expressions used in a statute ordinarily take their colour from the context in which they appear, should be kept in mind.
AR Antulay v RS Nayak
50
Court held that the International treaties, covenants and conventions although may not be a part of our Municipal Law can be referred to and followed by the courts having regard to the fact that India is a party to the said treaties.
Pratab Singh v. State of Jharkhand (2005)
51
Court referred to CEDAW and prepared guidelines on sexual harassment of women at workplaces. CASE 4: DK Basu v State of West Bengal CASE 5: Bachpan Bachao Andolan Case
Vishakha v State of Rajasthan Court referred to CEDAW and prepared guidelines on sexual harassment of women at workplaces. CASE 4: DK Basu v State of West Bengal court referred to UDHR, ICCPR and ICESCR. CASE 5: Bachpan Bachao Andolan Case Child rights convention was referred to by SC
52