Module 2.3: Liver Flashcards
Epidemiology of HCC
- Commonest primary cancer of the liver worldwide
- 5th commonest cancer
- 3rd leading cause of cancer-related death (after Lung & GI)
- Incidence 500,000-1,000,000/year
- 750,000 deaths/year
Liver is also a common site for secondary metastasis.
• Most cases HCC occur in Asia
• Very high incidence in East Asia
o 99/105 people in Mongolia
o 49/105 Korea
o 29/105 Japan
o 35/105 China
• Sub-Saharan Africa, West Africa (Gambia, Guinea, and Mali)
• Moderately high risk (11–20 cases/100,000): Italy, Spain and Latin American
• Intermediate risk (5–10 cases/100,000): France, UK, Germany
• Relatively low incidence (less than 5 cases/100,000) US, Canada,
• Large areas of the world where the incidence is still unknown
o Due to resource poor countries poor data collection
• Men: HCC 2 - 5x more common than in women
- HCC incidence increases with age
- Highest prevalence in >65y
- HCC rare before 50y in North America & Western Europe
- But a shift in incidence towards younger persons noted in last two decades
Risk Factors in HCC
• Chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis of any cause: 2-4% annual incidence
o 80-90% of all HCCs occur on a background of chronic liver disease
• Hepatitis B virus and level of HBV-DNA
• Toxins:
o Aflatoxin: mycotoxin that commonly contaminates corn, soybeans, and peanuts
o Betel nut chewing
- Hepatitis C: 1/3 HCC cases
- Iron Overload/Haemachromatosis
- Tobacco and Alcohol abuse
- Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Diabetes
Coffee in HCC
o Observational studies suggest coffee is a protective factor for HCC.
o 2 or more cups/day associated with 43% reduction of HCC
Role of Hepatitis B in HCC
55-65% of HCC cases related to HBV
• 100X more infectious than HIV
• 10X more infectious than HCV
• Worldwide, accounts for >50% of all HCC cases and virtually all childhood cases
• WHO rates Hep B as the 2nd most important human carcinogen (1st = tobacco)
Pathogenesis of HCC
risk factors cause chronic injury to the hepatocytes
This causes necrosis and subsequent regeneration and proliferation
Over time, there is proliferative arrest and increased stellate cell activation, causing liver cirrhosis
scarred and cirrhotic tissues, hyperplastic nodules form (regenerative)
They undergo genomic instability and become dysplastic
Marked genomic instability and loss of p53 causes carcinogenesis
Another important step between the formation of HCC and a dysplastic nodule is angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels) this is used as basis to form a diagnosis and provide a target for treatment
Molecular Pathogenesis of HCC
150 mutation driver genes known in Human Cancer
0-40 mutations per tumour – not all cancer drivers (Volgenstein 2013)
Examples of signalling pathways in HCC which have been reported to be activated in differing studies (10-50% of HCCs)
o Beta-catenin o pERK o pAKT o p56 o mTOR o NOTCH o IGF-2 o kRas, Hras o Others: e.g. UHRF1, pRAF, MER
Hepatitis C Molecular Pathways in HCC
- Hep C = RNA Virus
* Wnt, Raf, ERK activation
Hepatitis B Molecular Pathways in HCC
- Integration of viral DNA randomly into host genome
- P53 mutation
- Ras activation
- Microdeletions e.g. PDGF, TERT
- HBx protein induces HCC in transgenic mice
Why is HCC more common in Men?
• Risk factors are more common in men e.g. men are thought to be more promiscuous hence higher chance of having Hep B/C/HIV, men drink and smoke more
• More recent epidemiological studies reveal risk factors are not the only cause (not just related to lifestyle)
• Molecular Mechanism thought to relate to IL-6
o Mediator produced by Kupffer cells that promotes HCC
o Oestrogens inhibit Il-6 women protected?
Explain the difference between screening and surveillance
• Screening - application of diagnostic tests in patients at risk for HCC, but in whom there is no a priori reason to suspect that HCC is present
• Surveillance - repeated application of screening tests in high risk groups
o >80% HCC cases develop in setting of cirrhosis/chronic liver disease
Describe the supporting evidence for surveillance of HCC
• Zhang et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004 (China):
o RCT: surveillance vs no surveillance;
o Showed survival benefit of 6-monthly surveillance with
serum AFP + liver USS
o 18,816 pts with hepatitis B infection
o Adherence to surveillance poor (60%)
o But in surveillance pts, HCC related mortality was reduced by 37% (5y f/up)
AFP in HCC surveillance
Alpha Feto Protein
• AFP only found in pregnant women as they produce it due to foetal production, otherwise levels should be low unless one has a tumour: HCC or teratoma
• AFP about 20 ng/mL provides optimal balance: sensitivity vs specificity
o Even then sensitivity only 60%
- Higher cut-off means a smaller proportion of HCCs will be detected
- Reducing cut-off means more HCCs identified, but an increase in false +ve rate
- AFP > 200ng/mL has a very high positive predictive value for HCC
- Persistently elevated AFP shown to be a risk factor for HCC
Ultrasonography (USS) in HCC surveillance
- Bolondi et al, Gut 2001
- HCC classically hypoechoic
- Sensitivity 65-80%; Specificity >90% as screening test
• But
o USS performance not well defined in nodular cirrhotic livers (<1cm)
o Operator dependent
o Difficult in obese patients
• Ideal surveillance interval 6 months proposed based on tumour doubling times
- 80-90% HCC cases develop in setting of cirrhosis
- Surveillance is cost-effective in cirrhosis
• Hepatitis B carriers (RR 100, ↑with age)
o Asian males >40 yrs
o Asian females >50 yrs
o All cirrhotics
o Family history HCC
o Africans over age 20
o Patients with high HBV [DNA] and with ongoing hepatic inflammatory activity remain at risk for HCC
Not screened:
• Non-hepatitis B cirrhosis
o Hepatitis C
o Alcoholic cirrhosis - up to 35% of all HCCs (Hassan et al. Hepatology 2002; Schoniger-Hekele et al. EJGH 2000)
o Genetic haemochromatosis – HCC RR x 20; incidence 3%/year
o Primary biliary cirrhosis – incidence same as for Hep C cirrhosis
Screening Hepatitis C Cirrhosis for HCC risk
• Hepatitis C - HCC risk 2-8%/year (RR x 20)
• Non-invasive markers to predict the stage of fibrosis?
o Platelet count, alpha 2-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, haptoglobin, bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase, AST/ALT ratio
o Fibroscan, MRI etc
o None validated, cannot be recommended
Co-infection with HIV in risk of HCC
- More rapidly progressive liver disease
- When cirrhotic, have ↑ risk of HCC
- MORTAVIC study - HCC caused 25% of all liver deaths in post-HAART era (Rosenthal AIDS. 2003; Puoti AIDS 2004)
• Treated Viral Hepatitis
o Regressed fibrosis is not a reason to withhold surveillance
• Patients on Liver Transplant Waiting List
o Continue surveillance
Importance of early diagnosis in HCC
- Nakashima et al. Hepatol Res. 2003: The smaller the lesion, the less likely there is to be microscopic vascular invasion
- Sala et al. Hepatology 2004: The smaller the lesion the more likely it is that local ablation will be complete
Diagnostic methods in HCC
• Radiology (inc cross-sectional): HCC vascular tumour, Biopsy, AFP
• Lesions <1cmØ
o Low likelihood of HCC
o US at 3 month intervals
o If no growth in two years, revert to routine surveillance (level III)
• Lesions >2cmØ (Torzilli et al. Hepatology 1999; Barcelona-2000 EASL conference)
o Detection of a >2cm mass within cirrhotic liver is highly suspicious of HCC
o If:
AFP > 200 ng/mL and
Radiology suggestive of HCC (e.g. characteristic arterial vascularization; “washout” in venous phase), seen on two imaging modalities, eg, triphasic CT scan and MRI (gadolimiun) if 1-2cm
• HCC is v likely and biopsy is not essential
o If imaging atypical/AFP low, differential Dx is broader, consider biopsy
o Positive Predictive Value >95% (radiology)
Changes in intranodular blood supply with the progression of hepatocarcinogenesis
- The more dysplastic and cancerous the hepatocyte, the less portal blood supply it receives and the more arterial supply
- Regenerative nodules mainly receive blood from portal blood, but the cancerous cells undergo angiogenesis and have their own arterial supply, with no portal supply
- Can make diagnosis without a biopsy
Staging Systems
• No worldwide consensus • Relates to prognosis • Various o TNM o Okuda o Child-Pugh o MELD o Barcelona, France, Italy, Austria, China, Japan • Ideally need to take into account the pathology and liver function
- None have been adequately cross-validated
- Barcelona-Clinic-Liver-Cancer (BCLC) staging system used in the UK
Barcelona-Clinic-Liver-Cancer (BCLC) staging system
- Includes tumour stage, liver function, physical status, cancer symptoms, Child-Pugh Score (estimates liver function most patients die from liver failure as opposed to actual cancer)
- Links with treatments + estimation of life expectancy based
• Early stage disease o Preserved liver function (CP A-B) o Solitary HCC or up to 2 nodules <3cm in size o Possibility of long term cure o 5y survival 50-75%
• Intermediate stage o Child-Pugh A-B o Large/multifocal HCC o No cancer related symptoms or macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread o 3y survival up to 50%
• Advanced stage
o Cancer symptoms and/or with vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread
o 1y survival 50%
o Therapeutic trials with new agents
• End stage
o Extensive tumour involvement
o Severe deterioration of physical capacity (WHO performance status >2)
o And/Or major impairment of liver function (Child-Pugh C)
o Median survival <3m
Treatment of HCC
see p34 for diagram
• Early stage treatments:
o Ablation
o Resection
o Transplant (must be within Milan criteria)
• Advance treatments:
o TACE: trans-arterial chemoembolization
o Sorafenib
o BSC: best supportive care
Performance status in HCC scoring
PS = performance status
- 0 = can function on your own
- 1 = can do most things but get tired easily
- 2 = need help with daily tasks such as getting dressed
- 3 = bed bound
- 4 = about to die
If you have a PS of 4, you are already very frail so you should NOT be given chemo as the chemo will kill you.
Surgical Resection in HCC Tx
• Treatment of choice for HCC in non-cirrhotics
o Only who account for 5% of HCCs in West (but 40% in Asia)
• Resection in cirrhosis
• Careful selection - risk postoperative liver failure
• Right hepatectomy higher risk of inducing decompensation than left
• 5-year survival rates >50%
• Llovet et al. Hepatology 1999: Selection of optimal pts for resection:
o Normal BR
o No clinically significant portal hypertension or as measured by hepatic vein catheter (hepatic vein pressure gradient <10 mmHg)
• These are best predictors of excellent outcomes after surgery
• Such patients do not decompensate after resection
• 5-year survival >70%
i.e. can only resect if patient has no evidence of liver decompensation.
Portal vein embolisation (PVE) of hepatic lobe hosting tumor
- Aim is to induce compensatory liver growth of future liver remnant (FLR) and functional capacity in non-affected lobe, prior to resection
- i.e. shrink the part of liver with cancer and enlarge normal part which will be left behind after resection
- Procedure: involves embolising blood supply to tumour causing ischaemia and necrosis to that part of the liver in compensation the liver regenerates and hypertrophies as a result
- If predicted FLR <25% in non-cirrhotics; <40% in cirrhotics
Benefits
• Post-resection morbidity reduced
• Decreased length of stay in ICU and inpatient hospitalisation
• Patients initially unresectable because of insufficient remaining normal hepatic parenchyma can undergo potential curative resection