Module 13 Flashcards
Because parties often don’t state the order of performance, constructive conditions will do what?
Fill the gaps based on common sense that the average person is familiar with by reason of experience
What are constructive conditions?
Conditions created by the courts to do justice
What must a party that performs over an extended period of time do to become entitled to?
Substantially perform
If Periodic payments have been agreed on, performance is a constructive condition to what?
To the first payment, and that payment is a constructive condition precedent to the next stage of work, etc.
What is a material breach?
No cure, but the aggrieved party can cancel the contract and Sue for total breach. Unless the breaching party has repudiated, the plaintiff can also elect to continue with the contract and Sue for partial breach. Justifies the suspension of performance
What is required for total breach?
Requires a showing that the plaintiff would’ve been ready, willing, and able to perform but for the bridge. Justifies cancellation of the contract
What happens if a breach is immaterial?
Plaintiff may not cancel the contract, but can sue for partial breach
Can a plaintiff withhold partial payment for the other party’s partial breach?
Split of authority
- UCC and some cases: withholding is authorized
- other courts: this is a material breach
What can be recovered for total breach?
Full damages
What Happens if a breach is partial?
The contract continues, but the plaintiff can recover damages caused by the partial bitch
How long can a breaching party cured by remedying the defect?
Until there is a total breach that justifies cancellation of the contract
What must the plaintiff do to allow cure?
Itemize the defects
What are the factors to consider in determining if a breach is material?
I) extent the contract has been performed
II) a willful breach is more likely to be material than a negligent one
III) a quantitatively serious breach is more likely to be material. Ratio of part performed to the part to be performed
IV) consequences like degree of hardship on the plaintiff, adequacy of damages, etc.
How does delay in performance affect the contract?
A party doesn’t need to perform on the precise day stated in the contract unless time is of the essence
If Time isn’t of the essence in a contract when must the performance be completed?
A reasonable delay in performing doesn’t constitute a total breach, but unreasonable delay does
If time is of the essence, what does that do to a delay?
Any delay is a total breach
What must be considered to determine breach?
The intention of the parties, in light of the document and surrounding circumstances, including the parties’ words, actions, and agreement
If time is of the essence, what must be done to make sure the contract is clear about that?
It must be clearly stated in the contract, just stating a time for performance doesn’t make time of the essence
How does the delay in performance rule apply to the UTC?
It doesn’t
If more than one promise is made, how does substantial performance apply?
Each promise doesn’t have to be substantially performed, overall substantial performance is fine
What is the split in authority about a willful breach?
- some courts say substantial performance doesn’t apply because the willful transgressor must except his penalty
- modern approach: a willful breach doesn’t prevent substantial performance, it is only one of the factors to be considered. Focus is on good faith and fair dealing
How are Trivial defects, even if willful treated?
Ignored because of de minimus non curat Lex
Is substantial performance full performance?
No, the party that has substantially performed is limited to contract price less appropriate allowance for the cost of completing omissions and correcting defects
What are the two views on splitting a claim?
A) logical view: you’re permitted to institute another action and shouldn’t be barred from recovery of the damages they couldn’t have been recovered in the first action
B) minority: theory of splitting an indivisible contract. There can only be one clean for the breach of one indivisible contract. Plaintiff should wait to bring an action until the consequences of the grades are clear because it is possible the defendant will not perform and the printer doesn’t want to be precluded from bringing a second action
What is the rationale behind the theory of splitting an indivisible contract?
Multiple actions on the same claim or unjust for the defendants, and the effect of the judgment is meant to extinguish a claim
What is the rule against splitting a cause of action ?
Even though there are successive breaches the plaintiff must sue for all the breaches that have occurred prior to the action’s commencement or lose the right to any cause of action not included
What is the UCC perfect tender rule?
Substantial performance doesn’t apply to sale of goods, instead of the buyer is free to reject the goods unless the tender conforms in every respect to the contract (not just quantity, quality, shipment details, etc.)