Module 1 - Genetics of Obesity Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

What is a genome? (3)

A
  1. genetic material of an organism
  2. hereditary information
  3. “coding and non-coding info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

C-value paradox

A

organisms complexity not correlated with genome size

humans:
25,000 genes (small - coding region)
2.9 billion base pairs (large - includes non-coding)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Use genomic information for…

A

4 P’s

  • prediction
  • prevention
  • personalization
  • participation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Personalized medicine (nutrition) vs precision medicine (nutrition)

A

Personalized
- not feasible

Precision

  • considers similar individuals
  • targets specific need (ex. low iron absorption)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Common (older) method for sequencing genome

A

Sanger method (1980) aka dideoxy method

  • amplify DNA
  • 4 reacting mixtures
  • primed DNA to be sequenced, DNA polymerase, nucleotides, 1 of 4 labeled chain terminating nucleotide
  • chain build and ends at random
  • gel electrophoresis determines length (smallest travels furthest - read bottom to top - smallest to largest - 5’ to 3’)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DNA name

A

deoxyribonucleic acid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

2 groups who sequenced the genome

  • goal
  • primary difference between approaches
A

Public Consortium (human genome project)

  • sequence ALL 3billion BP using BACs
  • coding and non-coding

Private Consortium (celera genomics)

  • sequence all genes shotgun method
  • coding only
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a BAC

A

bacterial artificial clone

- circular bacterial plasmid and gene of interest ligated (bond together)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

of BPs used in shotgun and BAC

A
BAC = 150,000bp
Shotgun = 2000bp, 10000bp
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BAC approach advantages (2)

A

1 - Reduce chance to misassemble because location is better known
2 - sequencing step is quick, dont need to sequence both ends of DNA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BAC approach disadvantages (2)

A

1 - laborious and time consuming

2 - bioinformatically heavy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Shotgun approach advantages (1)

A

experimentally quicker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

shotgun approach disadvantages (2)

A

1 - experimentally quicker (sequenced from both ends)

2 - major problems dealing with “repeat sequences”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

BAC method DNA sequencing steps

A

1) Form BACs
- approximately 150,000bp
- 30,000 formed)
2) create BAC library (amplify in bacteria / ecoli)
3) sequence landmarks (200-500bp)
- dna postal codes
- overlap and create a map
4) form M13 library
- smaller pieces fit into specific BAC
5) sanger sequencing of M13
6) sequence alignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Shotgun method of DNA sequencing steps

A

1) restriction enzymes cut DNA into 2000 and 10,000 bp
2) form base plasmid library
* skip steps 3 and 4
5) sanger sequencing
- dont know which piece belongs to which gene or chromosome
6) sequence alignment
- align 2000bp to 10,000bp
- huge problems with repeats - requires powerful computer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Importantance of studying DNA (4)

A
  • inter-individual variability in disease phenotype and response to intervention (pharmacogenomics/nutrigenomics)
  • infuence gene expression and function (gene dosage/ more copies)
  • genes underlying common diseases (genetic targets for pharma - SNPs)
  • how disease is passed between generations (transgenerational effect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

% genetic component of obesity

A

40-80% (strong!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

best method to study if environmental impact depends on genes

A

Twin studies (genetically identical)

  • intervention, control for environmental factors
  • similar impact on twins, huge variance between individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

microscopic structural variations in genomes (2)

A

aneuploidy
- abnormal # of chromosomes

heteromorphism
- visible region of a chromosome that varies in size or morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

small-scale variations in the genome (5)

A

1) non-coding DNA (junk DNA)
2) copy number variants (CNVs) and segmental duplications (SDs)
3) inversions
- DNA segment reverse orientation to rest of chromosome
4) translocations
- DNA portion changes position w/o changing sequence
5) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
- single bp changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

non-coding dna regulation of protein-coding dna (3)

A

1) non-coding functional RNA’s (tRNAs, rRNAs, siRNAs, etc)
2) promotor/repressor seq.
3) sequence recognition during meiosis (centromeres)

22
Q

Difference between segmental duplications and copy-number varients

A

SDs spread out

CNV side by side

23
Q

potential issue when studying SDs and CNVs

A

reference genomes are only as good as the people in that pool
- highly variable between populations, geographically, etc

24
Q

how do CNVs and SDs arise?

A

recombination within a chromosome
recombination between non-homologous chromosomes (maternal/paternal)

*happens in part due to repeat sequences in the genome

25
SD size
>1kb - 90% sequence identity (not perfect match but very similar) - constitutes 5% of genome
26
SD location (is it random?)
spread over a persons genome - not random - 2% of SDs on chrome 3, 12% on chromosome 22 - still unclear why
27
Cause of SD formation
Replication errors or non-allelic homologous recombination (high sequence similarity but are not alleles) - what determines where they occur still unclear
28
SD direct effects on phenotype
``` gene expression (dosage sensitive genes) - specifically genes involved with immunity (mean not random ```
29
SD indirect effect on phenotype
structural rearrangements within chromosomes | - can be positive or negative
30
major example of SD | - how does it work
CCL31L - increases # cause reduction in susceptibility to HIV infection and progression of AIDS - protein product competes with HIV binding site (CCR5 - chemokine receptor type 5) *controversial
31
CCL31L - SD - HIV-1/AIDS more common in smaller # of duplications - why might # of duplications be higher in a places with higher disease prevalence?
possible adaptation due to environmental pressures - reason still unclear - controversial
32
CNV size | - proportion of genome?
1kb - 1mb | - constitutes 12% of the genome
33
CNV location
CNVs found side by side on chromosomes
34
CNV contribution to variations in genome
randomly selected genomes - differ by atleast 1% due to CNVs * relevance - humans are 99% similar (not 99.9% - old theory) - very common in human genome
35
cause of CNV formation
replication errors or non-allelic homologous recombination (high sequence similarity but not alleles) - what determines where they occur still unclear * same as SDs
36
Distribution and frequency of CNVs
prevalent across genome | - 10% of protein coding genes have CNVs
37
CNV direct effect on phenotypes
effect gene expression (dosage sensitive genes) - enriched in regions where genes are involved with immune function and defence responses to bacteria provide redundancy - organisms can evolve new or modified functions - 2 copies, 1 mutates -- HUGE effect - multiple copies, 1 mutates -- small/no effect - translocation, deletion or duplication events can affect exons, proteins aquire diff structure and function
38
CNV major example
AMY1 (alpha amylase) - high # reported in populations consuming high carbohydrate (starch) diets - more copies, more amylase in saliva to break down starch * relevance - shows potential effect of environmental pressures of #
39
CNVs involved with obesity
**AMY1 - alpha amylase Others: Chromosome 4 - UCP1 (thermogenesis) - IL5 (inflammation) Chromosome 16 - large CNV regions (28 genes) rare varient - duplications -- extreme leanness - deletions -- morbid obesity
40
Effect of large copy # of AMY1 (alpha amylase)
more copies, more protein, lower BMI - found in saliva and blood - link between ability to digest and body weight
41
Imprinted genes
- sex specific imprints (methylation) - only receive one copy of gene - certain genes always silenced from mom, others from dad during formation of egg and sperm - silenced throughout life, reset sex-specific imprints and totipotency during egg/sperm formation - necessary for normal development
42
Imprinted genes effect on health risk
protection from diploidy no longer exists - mutation in the only copy, gene no longer expressed - ex. Prader-Willi syndrome
43
Genetic conflict theory (imprinting)
- males try to maximize use of maternal resources so offspring become stronger and healthier - females minimize use of maternal resources so all offspring survive - imprinting (methylation) causes battle for nutrients
44
Imprinted genes and obesity
- controls resetting of parental imprints during gametogenesis (chromosome 15) - equal occurrence in males, females and all ethnicities - Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) - Angelman Syndrome (AS) - together most common cause for life threatening obesity in children
45
Pradaer Willi syndrome (PWS) - cause (gene) - clinical signs
4Mb deletion/silencing of 'paternal' chromosome 15 (70% of cases) - multiple genes in this region - SNRPN (gene encoding component of mRNA splicing) - obesity, excessive hunger, hypergonadism, sleep apnea, behavioural problems, mild/moderate retardation remember: P - paternal
46
Angelman Syndrome (AS) - cause (gene) - clinical signs
Deletion UBE3A on 'maternal' chromosome 15 (70% of cases) - ubiquitin pathway - severe mental retardation, absence of speech, smaller heads - but no obesity**
47
Allele
alternate form of a gene at a given locus on a chromosome
48
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) | - amount and frequency
10million SNPs within human population - 1 every 300 nucleotides - most frequent source of polymorphic changes * variation based on geographic location - 14000 people only 200,000 SNPs - can tell with 50% accuracy where people are from (Europe study)
49
SNPs associated with obesity
FTO and MC4R - 6 others less significant - 8 SNPs together explain
50
FTO gene
- highly expressed in hypothalamus - anorexigenic (appetite surpressing) - demethylase (animal / in vitro) - potential adipocyte development (white vs brown fat) and thermogenesis SNP 'risk' allele - weighed 3kg more on average - consumed 200kcal more on average
51
Direct to consumer (DTC) genetic tests vs traditional predictors - as predictors of obesity - SNP (FTO or top 32) vs family
childhood obesity and parental obesity prediction - 75% accuracy genetic prediction (FTO or top 32) - 57% accuracy relevance** - more SNPs found that associate with obesity, but