Modern Ontological Argument Flashcards

Theme 2B

1
Q

What does Mackie argue about denying the existence of God?

A

To deny the existence of God is as absurd as saying ‘the existing x’ does not exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who developed Anselm’s second form regarding God’s existence?

A

Norman Malcolm developed Anselm’s second form, arguing that God cannot be a contingent being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the significance of an ‘unlimited being’ in Malcolm’s argument?

A

An ‘unlimited being’ cannot depend on other things, making the argument less personal and more unbiased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does Malcolm’s theory compare to Anselm’s?

A

Malcolm’s theory can be more appealing and is simpler due to changed terminology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What must God be according to Malcolm?

A

God must be necessary and must exist; existence is not a perfection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is God’s existence not impossible in Malcolm’s view?

A

Because the notion that makes it so can be considered contradictory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the properties of God as a necessary being according to Charles Hartshorne?

A

Existence is a property, and a necessary being is greater than contingent beings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Hartshorne argue about necessary existence?

A

If God has necessary existence, it is logically impossible for Him not to exist, therefore God exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a criticism of the Modal Ontological Argument (MOA)?

A

Both Malcolm and Hartshorne have not contributed new information, so this cannot be considered a development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Descartes’ famous statement regarding existence?

A

Cogito ergo sum - ‘I (over)think, therefore I (over)am.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What distinction did Descartes make in his argument?

A

He distinguished between essence and existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did Descartes illustrate his argument using a triangle?

A

He used the triangle analogy to show that while a triangle must have three angles adding up to 180 degrees, this does not demand its existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Descartes argue about the existence of a supremely perfect being?

A

He argued that existence is an aspect of perfection, and therefore such a being exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly