Modern Natural Law Flashcards
What is the context of Hugo Grotius’ theory of law?
- lived durng the era of uncertainty in Europe - 30 Years’ War; fall of religious unity
- internal conflicts (religious divisions within states between Catholics and Protestants)
- external conflicts (territorial disputes among states)
- Grotius saw problems:
1. internal laws were changing quickly depending on political regimes
2. there were no rules stablish to govern relationships among states
Grotius’ social contract theory.
- State of nature - people are sociable and rational => humans naturally seek others to from agreements and respect of those agreements is seen reasonable by all
- Social contract - agreement among individuals (no divine will); pact obliges people to joint together and subordinate to the sovereign; contract provides framework for resolving disputes
- Civil state - individuals unite under a sovereign which has the power to dictate laws
Main features of Grotius’ theory.
- Secularism - “let’s put God in brackets”, laws and principles can be valid even without the divine presence; law is grounded on reason
- Individualism - mainly economic, humans seek greedom to act, produce and enrich themselves; make contracts ad form agreements to advance mutual benefits; laws centre on the contracts between individuals; society is collection of individuals (contracts govern their relationships)
- Rationalism - truth and always are guaranteed by reason; contract embody rational though and the voluntary consent of individuals
Philosophical foundation of Hobbes’ thought.
- rejection of scholasticism - sought scientific base for understanding politics and society; emphasised obervable phenomena and rational deduction
- empiricism - Galilieo
- rationalism - Descartes
- political geometry - after observation, one must work with abstract concepts and formulte a hypothesis
State of nature for Hobbes.
- humans are self-interested and aggressive
- Homo hominis lupus
- Bellum omnium contra omnes
- everyone has the “right to everything” which creates conflict between everyone
- fear and desire to self-preservation guide the conduct of individuals in the state of nature
Social contract for Hobbes.
- people give up their “right to everything” in exchange for peace and security
- everyone makes contract with themselves to give up their right on behalf of a third party and unite under the rule of sovereign
- sovereign is the only one who does not take part in the contract and retain the right to everything
Civil state and sovereignty accroding to Hobbes.
- sovereign is Levithan = has absolute power (both civil and religious)
- sovereignty must be absolute to effectively maintain order
- sovereign is not bound by social contract and operates outside of its constrains
- best form of government is monarchy - ensures stability and security, concentrating power in a single ruler
Law according to Hobbes.
1) Civil law
- command issued by the sovereign
- validity of law is derived from the authority of the sovereign, not the content
- law is binding. because of people’s fear of punishment and the authority of the sovereign
- justice is adherence to the decrees
2) Natural law
- laws derived from reason, aiming at preserving life and promoting peace
- create rational basis for societal order
- Hobbes outlines total of 19 laws of nature
1) seeak peace, but be prepared to defend oneself if peace is unattainable
2) give up the right to everything, limiting own freedom to ensure collective security
3) keep covenants, breaking agreements undermines trust and stability
State of nature and social contract according to Locke.
1) State of nature
* optimistic - people are tolerant, reasonable and want to improve their position in a peaceful way
* conflicts are pathological and abnormal (to resolve them authority needs to be established)
* everyone has inherent rights - life, liberty, property
2) Social contract
* bilateral agreement with the sovereign (state)
* agreement to preserve the natural rights
* need to social contract arises from pathological disputes
Civil state according to Locke.
- central function of Parliaments - citizens discuss and uphold rights; functions on trust and consent
- contract established rule of law that applies to everyone, even the state
- sate has to be non-interventionist (minimal intervention, only when necessary)
- state should function as impartial judge (adjudicating disputes, but otherwise non-active)
- strict separation of powers (legislative, executive, international law)
- Parliament cannot delegate authority and executive cannot rule through extraordinary measures
Right to resistence.
- according to Locke, when state stops performing the contract (guaranteeing the inherent right) citizens have the chnage to make an appeal to Heaven and remove the sovereign
- 5 conditions enabling appeal to heaven
1. external conquest
2. internal usurpation
3. tyranny (semblance of order, but unjust governance)
4. dissolution of government (lack of trust)
5. undue deprivation of property
State of nature according to Rousseau.
- people are Le Bon Sauvage = innocent, self-sufficient, uncorrupted
- amour de soi = primal and natural self-love; self-preservation without harming others
- in state of nature there is no property, hierarchy and therefore no inequalities
Social contract according to Rousseau.
- private property introduced inequality and societal division
- amour propre = self-love which emerged with civilisation; rooted in comparison with others, fueled by competition, envy and need for validation
- people become dependent on each other which creates hierarchies and inequalities
- social contract should reconcile individual freedom with collective order
- individuals willingly surrender their natural freedoms in exchange for civil rights
General will for Rousseau.
- general will represents the collective interests and shared values of the community
- overarching moral and political consensus, not a sum of individual wills
- guides creation of laws and governance structures
- citizens are morally and socially oblogated to follow the general will
Laws in civil state according to Rousseau.
- creation of laws if grounded on the general will
- laws are restrictive - limit individual freedom
- laws are liberating - ensure equality and collective freedom through estavlished processes of justice and protection
- state should educate citizens so they would align with the general will
- law should create equality and mutual obligations for the state and its citizens