Modern democracies Flashcards

1
Q

define the term democracy

A

The term democracy has ancient Greek origins “Rule [kratos] by People [demos]”. It is 2500 years old concept with altering meaning. Nowadays we differentiate btw procedural democracy in which the people or citizens of the state have less influence than in traditional liberal democracies and where voters choose to elect representatives in free elections. And substantive democracy which is manifested by equal participation of all groups in society in the political process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What Dahl says about democracy, what are its basic attitudes?

A
  • Democracy: complex procedures with special characteristics and conditions
  • Method of managing public affairs
  • Social control differs from the ancient ways
  • Is based on equality
    ● access to information
    ● influencing decision makers
    ● suffrage (right to vote)→ Poliarchy (where there’s a pluralism in society (IGs, values, interest) and permanent competition among them and no monolith powerful actor)
  • Prerequisite: consensus on norms
  • ‘Social training’: how ppl acquire tastes (family, Church, school etc): reinforcing, neutral, negative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the elements of democracy?

A
  • public realm: encompasses the making of collective norms and choices that are binding on the society and backed by state coercion
  • citizens: regimes can have rules and a public realm, but a regime is only democratic when it has citizens
  • competition
  • regular, fair elections: insecurity, as it occurs with intervals and only allows to choose between the highly aggregated alternatives offered by parties
  • majority rule
  • cooperation: collective decisions binding on the whole polity are necessary
  • representative institutions: most of the real work in modern democracies
  • what democracy is NOT: efficient economy, efficient administration, political stability, closed society and economy -> democracies may not immediately produce all the goods mentioned above, but they stand a better chance of eventually doing so than do autocracies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When democracy = represenatiton - procedural

A
  • Joseph A. Schumpeter: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942)
    ⮚ Democracy isn’t a question of values, but a decision-making system
    ● “a certain type of institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions”
    ● Main features: competition for leadership
    ● The citizens only duty is to choose btw the competitive elites
  • Giovanni Sartori:
    ● distinction is btw what is and what should be happening?
    ● Democracy = ruling of political elites
    ● invincible contrast btw idea and reality —» danger of eradicating democracy
  • social apathy and inactivity are inherent elements (and necessary support for) representative democracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Democracy = participation - substantive

A

a. CAROLE PATEMAN: Participation and democratic theory
- the need for actual participation appears in the 1960s
- post-war generations’ critics to representative democracy, and claim for participation
- Models: feminist movements, workers’ self-management in Yugoslavia (60s, 70s), student movements
b. J.J. ROUSSEAU: Discourse on Inequality (1754), The Social Contract (1762)
- economic inequality leads to political inequality
- greater participation leads to more complete equality
- 3 important functions (outcomes) of participation: education. Legitimation, integration
c. G. D. H. COLE (The world of labour, 1913… 1920)
- social organization theories, self-management of different social groups
- universal suffrage is not sufficient
- the actual (pivotal) area of participation: the workplace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the main features of poliarchy by Dahl and the essence of procedural/ representative democracy?

A
  • Control over governmental decisions about policy is constitutionally vested in elected officials
  • Frequent, fair and free elections
  • Universal suffrage: practically all adults have the right to vote in the election officials
  • Electability (universal suffrage II. – people can run for elective offices in the government)
  • Fundamental rights and liberties (right to express themselves)
  • They also have access to alternative sources of information that are not monopolized by the government or any other single group
  • Competition for political power: citizens can form relatively independent organizations (independent political parties, interest groups)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What Philippe C. Schmitter – Terry Karl “What Democracy is… and is not” add to the afore mentioned points?

A

1) Popularly elected officials must be able to exercise their constitutional powers without being subjected to overriding (albeit informal) opposition from unelected officials.
2) The polity must be self-governing; it must be able to act independently of constraints imposed by some other overarching political system
⮚ Modern political democracy is a system of governance in which rulers are held accountable for their actions in the public realm by citizens, acting indirectly through the competition and cooperation of their elected representatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the four types of democratic governments?

A
  1. Constitutional Monarchy (GB)
  2. Presidential Republic (USA)
  3. Semi-presidential republic (FR)
  4. Parliament Republic (HUN, IT)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe Great Britain’s Constitutional Monarchy!

A

⮚ Prime Minister: Rishi Sunak, Monarch: King Charles III.
- The executive has formally two bodies: the Cabinet (senior members appointed by PM) and the King (who is the head of it, but has no political and legal rights) who is the head of state.
- Parliamentary accountability
● no written constitution (uncodified)
● the Parliament has the final word
● confidence vote: the PM renounces if there is a lack of majority, a new P. is formed
● new rules from 2011: general elections should be held in every 5 years
- The Parliament is the main legislative body. It has a bicameral structure:
1) House of Lords (upper house) with members from the nobility. It’s not an elective body, they inherit the seats. They are able to delay legislations but cannot veto it.
2) House of Commons (lower house), fixed 650 members, elected. They make the laws, oversee and influence implementation.
- Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority since 2009 (before: House of Lords), but the Parliament remains the supreme authority
- Special terms: PM Question Time , Her Majesty’s Government/Opposition , backbencher , frontbencher , Role of the WHIPs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the French Semi-Presidential System!

A

⮚ Prime Minister: Jean Castex, President: Emmanuel Macron
- combination of Parliamentary and Presidential system (est. by de Gaulle) to avoid extreme situs
- executive power is divided btw President and PM
- limited constitutional (judicial) review
- referendum 1962 → President directly elected by the people
● Mostly foreign policy and basic strategic management
● initiating public referendums
● can dissolve the Parliament (National Assembly) (1962, 1968, 1997)
● can invoke emergency powers (1961, 2005, 2015)
● President names the PM→ NA has the right to resign the PM
- cohabitation: the President and the PM can come from different parties
- has a bicameral parliament
1) Assemblée Nationale: 557 representatives (deputes) elected by direct universal suffrage with a two-round system by constituency (absolute majority system), they have 5-years mandates. A majority is needed for an explicit motion of censure then the president may dissolve it.
2) Sénat: 348 members elected indirectly from department constituencies, selected by an electoral college, for a 6 years-term (half are elected every 3 years). They have a right to initiate electoral actions + must consider all bills
- party pluralism, personalistic elements are present, secularism of the state (Laïcité)
- civic distrust towards politics and politicians (low institutional trust)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the Parliamentary Republic (Hungary, Italy, Portugal, Greece)!

A
  • the govt is the head of the executive which must have the confidence of the parliament
  • the president is only formally the head and has no political responsibility
  • the president appoints the prime minister
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the American Presidential Republic!

A

⮚ President: Joe Biden (Democrat), Vice-President: Kamala Harris
- Important political foundations (based on Enlightenment): Declaration of Independence (1776), The Federalist Papers (1787-88, 89), Constitution & Bill of Rights (1791)
- Pillars of US politics:
● Federalism: all states have 2 representatives, so are equal in the Senate
● Checks and balances: controlled and limited power, full separation of the legislative, judiciary and the executive, the branches keep each other in check
● Judicial review: the Supreme Court has the final world on legal disputes -> Marbury vs. Madison 1803: law contrary to the Constitution is null and void
- The Congress has two chambers (struggle and competition btw them)
1) House of Representatives: elected for 2 years, 435 reps (chair: Speaker of the House)
2) Senate: elected for 6 years, 100 senates (chair: Vice-President). The principle of seniority dictates that the more years you spend in the Senate, the more influence you have.
- The President is the govt, the executive itself, chosen by semi-direct elections, the Senate can remove him from office. He is the head of the army, is entitled to sign int’l agreements, appoints the members of the Supreme Court, can initiate laws and has a veto right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe German Chancellor Democracy!

A

⮚ Chancellor: Olaf Scholz, Federal President: Frank Walter Steinmeier
- federal structure (16 “Lander”)
- bicameral legislation:
1) Bundestag (federal parliament): the main legislative power, with 598 representatives, elected for a 4-year term.
2) Bundesrat (Federal Council): with 69 members, the state (Lander) governments. Initiatives must be presented here as it first evaluates implementation in the state
⮚ both can initiate legislations and most bills must be approved by both chambers (as well as the executive branch) before it becomes law
- responsible government of parliamentary accountability:
● constructive vote of no confidence and Parliament’s vote of confidence
● responsibility of the chancellor (Bundeskanzler/Bundeskanzlerin)
● dissolution of the Bundestag: by the President of Germany (Bundesprazident)
- mixed but proportional electoral system + extremist political forces are constitutionally banned
- Federal Constitutional Court: eternal clauses that protect basic human rights cannot be changed
- well-organized advocacy organisations, effective (tripartite) reconciliation of interest, organized civil society, multilevel, extremely plural media, strong commitment to European integration, active int’l involvement (NATO, UN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define political culture!

A

the system of empirical beliefs, expressive symbols and values, which defines the situation in which political action takes place.’ (Almond & Verba).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the elements of political culture?

A
  • Political orientation: is an integrated set of beliefs, values and attitudes towards politics, and about the role of self in the system. It fulfils cognitive (knowledge and belief about the political system), affective (emotions and feelings about the pol. system), evaluative (judgments, decisions and opinions about political objects) functions.
  • Legitimacy: ab ovo refusal, policy-based conflict, refusal of the current political situ
  • Decision-making (from Almond & Verba’s Civic Culture)
    ● Participatory (US, GB): ppl understand that they are citizens and pay attention to politics. They are proud of their political system and willing to discuss it, they are active in their community which is ideal to sustain democracy. They have a high degree of political competence and efficacy.
    ● Subject (W Ger, Italy): ppl understand that they are citizens, but they pay attention more passively. There is a feeling among citizens that they should obey the authority but not participate much in politics. They are not proud of their political system so have little emotional commitment to it and they also feel uncomfortable about speaking about politics and don’t organise themselves into groups. They are less likely to trust people.
    ● Parochial (Mexico): they don’t care that they are citizens. They have little or no interest in national politics and identify only with the immediate locality. They don’t have pride in their political system and expect little. They don’t pay attention to politics and have no desire to participate. In societies like this it is very difficult to grow democracy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define political socialisation!

A

is the learning process by which people develop an understanding of their political identities, opinions, and behaviour. Through various agents of socialization, such as parents, peers, and schools, the lifelong experiences of political socialization play a key role in developing the traits of patriotism and good citizenship.

17
Q

Define ideology!

A

An ideology is a 1) coherent collection of normative beliefs, set of ideas on how people should live together and 2) a plan of action for applying these ideas. According to A. Downs it is a ‘verbal image of the good society, and of the chief means of constructing such society.’ Its key functions include explanatory (how the world works), evaluative (things are good/bad), orientation (sense of identity) and programme (what to do and how). The most fundamental ideologies include liberalism, conservatism, socialism and nationalism (see Tétel V).

18
Q

What are political institutions?

A

In a narrower meaning, “political institutions” are organizations that shape the actions within a political system. In the broader it is a set of rules and norms that organise political activity.

19
Q

What are political parties?

A

: ‘any political group identified by an official label that presents at elections and is capable of placing through elections (free or non-free), candidates for public office’ (Sartori). It is a group seeking to elect office-holders under a given label. It links citizens to the govt and is connected to some kind of an ideology. It aspires to have public authority.
● Functions: bridge btw ppl and govt, aggregation of interest, intermediation and representation (advocacy), mobilisation and integration (registered membership), political leadership (recruitment and selection), govt function and forming politics.
● Organisation (Mair-Katz): 1) party in public office (parl. or govt), 2) party on the ground (members, activists), 3) party central office (national leadership of the party organ).
● Typologies: mass, cadre, devotee (Duverger) , catchall (Kircheimer), cartell (Mair-Katz), patronage and ideological (Weber). They can also be democratic or non-democratic and can confirm or oppose the system.
● Ideologies: left-wing (level class differences by nationalising major industries), centre-left: welfare states, no nationalisation of industry, centrist: liberal on social issues, conservative on economic Qs, centre-right: dismantle the welfare state, promote capitalist growth, far-right: anti-immigration and anti-EU.
● Party systems: one-party (totalitarian/authoritarian systems), dominant-party (well-organised, controls TV), two-party (two major parties with the chance of winning), multi-party (several competing parties), two-plus (two large parties and few relevant smaller), fluid (new, unstable democracies, personalistic, no programme)

20
Q

What are movements?

A

coalitions of many groups and individuals. They deal with issues of moral, social and political nature. They emphasise participatory, inclusionary and democratic organisation, and have critical attitudes. Their ultimate goals and action are not negotiable within existing political arrangements. They operate on non-institutional forms of political expression (protest and public education).

21
Q

What are interest groups?

A

collection of people trying to influence the govt, non-publicly accountable organisations. They try to influence public policy and have common policy goals. While they try to influence the govt, they do not aspire to take control of it: if they run candidates, they become parties.

22
Q

What is public opininon?

A

views about specific leaders and policies + responses to current Qs

23
Q

What are the 4 theories of power?

A
  1. voluntarist theory
  2. hermeneutic
  3. structuralist theory:
  4. postmodern theory
24
Q

What are the types of political power?

A
  1. Biological
  2. Psychological
  3. voluntarist theory
  4. Cultural
  5. Rational
  6. Irrational
25
Q

Elaborate on Michel Foucault!

A

He was a French 20th century philosopher and historian, who spent his career criticizing the power of modern bourgeois capitalists state, including its police, law courts, prisons, doctors, and psychiatrists. His goal was to work out how power worked and then to change it in the direction of a Marxists-anarchists utopia.
- Foucault’s way of thinking about power allows us to find power in places where we would have never expected to find it before including universities and in scientific life itself.
- To think of power in terms of repression is the traditional way of thinking. Against that Foucault suggests that the most important kind of power in our modern society does not repress at all. It works in a less visible way. This power is what Foucault calls normalizing power. When we think of power, we tend to think of violence whether physical or mental, actual, or only threatened, this is the idea of power as a repression.
- Repressive power forces us to do what we do not want to do. Normalizing power makes us want to do what we have to do anyway. It turns us to people who automatically by their own will do what society wishes them to do. Normalizing power is power that determines what we see as normal. It constructs our view of the world and of ourselves. In that way it shapes our beliefs, our desires, and our decisions. While at the same time giving us the idea that these are our beliefs desires, and our decisions that nobody has forced them upon us. Therefore, normalizing power can be seen not only in politics and laws, but within family, school, university, the hospital, the psychiatric clinic and even commercials on TV.
- Two important things follow from Foucault views. 1) power is not wielded by a few individuals over the many, but something to which everyone is subjected; 2) scientific knowledge cannot be separated from power. As scientific institutions themselves are sources of normalizing power (University).

26
Q

What is transitology?

A

studies the transition from one political system to another, mostly from authoritarianism to democracy. There are five factors that kickstart the democratisation process: crisis/challenge, collapse, transition, renewal and consolidation. Each political system of today is the result of change of the previous one – change is always constant.
Main questions include: What factors induce internal changes? What makes a system stable and what makes it collapse?

27
Q

What are the types of political changes?

A
  • Reform: a gradual, legitimate and legal change either brough upon from above or below. Coming from the political elite it aims for more efficient governance (e.g. Bismarck’s social reforms), as a concession to protestors is about social equality (e.g. women’s suffrage), mobilisation of previously passive groups (Clinton’s rainbow coalition), reforms in developing countries for economic and social cath-up.
  • Coup d’état: an aggressive attempt to seize power, usually through military force. Power is seized by a narrow group of society, usually without the consent of the majority.
  • Revolution: the reorganisation or socio-economic and power relations. It usually includes masses and aggressive means. If there is no change in social relations, only in power, then it’s a coup d’état. It fundamentally transforms the political system, brings about new institutions and new modes or representation.
  • Democratic political transition: the transition from authoritarian regimes to democratic ones. Firstly, the transformation of 70s-80s in Latin-American and Southern European dictatorships, then 1989/90 the collapse of Central and East European socialist regimes.
28
Q

List the most important thinkers of transitology!

A
  • Rustow (1970)
  • O’Donnell-Schmitter-Whitehead (1986)
  • 1989, Annus Mirabilis?
  • Francis FUKUYAMA: The end of history and the Last Man (1989,1992)
  • The New Hope”?
    Samuel HUNTINGTON: The third wave (1991)
29
Q

What Rustow studied?

A
  • Main question: how are democracies born? → 70s start of post-colonial era expected to create democracy
  • Do not confuse the creation of democracy with the stability of democracy
  • „dynamic model” → etaps
    ● national unity: formation of uncontested sense of national unity. Before they can decide how to rule, they must agree on who ‘the people’ are.
    ● A prolonged and inconclusive political struggle: typically centred around the emerging new power (manufacturing elite) and democracy is born out of it. It can be violent and can also lead to the dominance of one group and the loss of the window of opportunity
    ● decision phase: conflicting parties realise the stalemate and they decide to compromise and adopt democratic forms of rules. They need to decide what kind of new system and how to organise it (they need to figure it out, otherwise they’d lose legitimacy: old system worked)
    ❖ revolution, referendum, coup: new pol. system, hold elections, new constitution
    ● habituation phase: citizens and politicians learn new system, the rules of democracy become a habit
30
Q

What O’Donnell-Schmitter-Whitehead (1986) studied?

A
  • Comparative analysis of Southern Europe and Latin America
  • terms are not interchangeable:
    ● transition: not democracy! can transition into diff. types e.g. dictatorship
    ● liberalization: market, eco. sphere from state oppression, widening of pol. rights
    ● democratization: transition into democracy: establishing democratic institutions
  • never effects of democratization:
    ● „second transition”: how society changes e.g. media, education, public services → needed for successful democracy
    ● extra-political institutions
    ● political equality in a wider sense: economy
31
Q

What 1989, Annus Mirabilis studied?

A
  • end of bipolar world: big surprise, no one foresaw it
  • relatively peaceful collapse of the Soviet system in Eastern Europe
    ● hidden conflicts become visible and
    ● economic and social struggles
  • the fall of the Berlin Wall (symbol)
  • stronger and more intensive globalization
  • the process of European Integration (Delors Commission
32
Q

What Fukuyama studied?

A

● 1989: final and total success of liberal democracy?
● history is fight btw ideas
- 1991: Balkan War (collapse & dissolution of Yugoslavia) → liberal order cannot solve it and strong European powers unable to prevent it

33
Q

“The New Hope”?
Samuel HUNTINGTON: The third wave (1991)

A

Btw 1974-1990 30 countries made transitions to democracies (double the democratic gov.)
⮚ 1st wave of democratization
- 1820-1926: widen the suffrage to large proportion of the male population in the US
- 1922 Mussolini→ reduction of the democracies. The first reverse wave, military coups ended democratic systems in the new countries of Eastern Europe and in Greece, Portugal, Argentina, and Japan.
⮚ 2nd wave of democratization
- 1962 triumph of the allies in WWII
- Reverse wave: military coups occurred in Indonesia, Pakistan, Greece, Nigeria, Turkey, and many Latin American countries + executive coups occurred in the second reverse wave in Korea, India, and the Philippines
⮚ 3rd wave of democratization
- Catholic wave in the 70s-80s→ begin in Portugal + Spain
- 5 major factors
1. deepening legitimacy problems of authoritarian regimes
2. global economic growth: increased living standards + expansion of the middle class
3. shift in the doctrine and activities of the Catholic Church (transformation of national Catholic Churches from defenders of the status quo → opponents of authorization)
4. policy changes in the case of external actors (EC, US, SU)
● EC played a key role in consolidating democracy in southern Europe → European Free Trade Association (EFTA)
● withdrawal of SU power made possible democratization in Eastern Europe
● US major promoter of democratization
5. “snowballing”: demonstration effect of earlier transitions (alone not enough), evident in Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia etc.