mod3 Flashcards
ULS
calculate the collapse load for the foundation
- most straightforward method is to use plastic analysis
SLS
determine the limiting working loads the foundation can support without deforming or settling excessively
Advantage of SLS Analysis: dividing the failure load by some “factor of safety”
stress-strain behaviour not required in detail for either ULS or SLS
disadvantage of SLS Analysis: dividing the failure load by some “factor of safety”
- previous knowledge and experience of the soil and circumstance required
- foundation settlement not calculated at all
- may lead to over design ($$) or under design (death)
Advantage of SLS Analysis: using stress-strain response of soil at working loads to determine expected elastic deformations
elastic methods give reasonable approximation of soil deformation
Disadvantage of using SLS Analysis: stress-strain response of soil at working loads to determine expected elastic deformations
rather complicated - good understanding of soil theoretical behaviour is required
Advantage of advanced analysis: geotechnical numerical modelling
- a fully modelled soil-structure interactive response
Disadvantage of advanced analysis: geotechnical numerical modelling
- extensive knowledge of soil parameters required and analysis effort can be relatively time-consuming and costly
Advantages of ULS: Plasticity Method
- do not need the full stress-strain relationship of the soil (only soil strength)
- if we use the critical state strength, we do not need to know about the soil’s initial state or stress history
Disadvantage of ULS: Plasticity Method
- plasticity methods do not give information about deformations
Assumptions in Plastic Analysis
- Soil Failure
2. Post-yield behaviour
In the case of elasticity based methods we use:
a) equilibrium of stresses and forces
b) a constitution law relating stress and strain
c) compatibility of strains and displacements
In the case of plasticity based methods we use:
1) a lower bound solution which satisfies:
a) conditions of equilibrium
b) a law based on material behaviour to ensure this falure criterion is not violated
2) an upper bound solution involving:
c) a kinematically admissible mechanism
lower bound “safe” theorem
if you can determine a set of stresses in the ground in equilibrium with external loads, and which does not exceed the soil strength anywhere in the ground, the structure will NOT collapse
upper bound “unsafe” theorem
if you take any compatible mechanism of slip surfaces and consider an increment of movement, and if you show that the work done by the soil resisting movement equals the work done by the external loads, the structure MUST collapse