MOD2 Flashcards
Paraphilic disorders
disorders of sexual behaviour
Behavioral accounts
This explains patients behaviors and does not diagnose
learning mechanisms (classical and operant) are not disordered but are normal
learned behavior is maladaptive
limitations of classical conditioning
Elimination of problem association is not sufficient
Poor or lack of generalization (extension of effect beyond specific instances present during initial learning)
Significant individual differences
non-uniform distribution of fetish objects . . . pink, black, smooth, silky, shiny
operant conditioning interventions
masturbatory satiation . . . continued masturbation during the refractory period, concurrent with fantasizing
verbal satiation . . . verbalizing fantasies while withholding from masturbation
orgasmic reconditioning . . . switching fantasy content following arousal; evidence of efficacy is weak
Features of depression
- affect
sadness, loneliness, emptiness, irritability - motivation
loss of interest, yearning for escape, paralysis of the will - cognition
negative self-concept, pessimism, guilt, negative interpretations of experience - behavior
reduced activity - physical
retarded movement, fatigue, weight change, appetite, sleep, sex drive
Components of psyche
ID - embodies innate drives and instincts
Ego - works to mediate ID and superego
Superego - moral values (sense of conscious)
Normal discharge of energy
Healthy mechanisms (sex, sport, pursuit of desires)
Unconscious mechanisms (express needs of unconscious in indirect way; uncontrollably)
Introjection
integration of identities of self with loved (lost) one
direction of feelings (anger) onto self
low self-esteem, depressed mood, helplessness
regression
to the oral stage of development (18–24 mths)
dependence; new dependencies, to elicit support
Beck and limitations of the psychoanalytic account
They ascribe purpose to symptoms (there is a reason someone is sleeping less)
They defy validation (cant measure directly)
They are not disorder specific
They may explain limited aspects of disorde
Soultion to the limitations of the psychoanalytic account
consider basic themes in the thinking (cognitive content) reported by depressed patients
The cognitive triad
The self: viewed as deficient, inadequate, understandable, worthless, defective
The world: experiences construed as defeat, deprivation, burdensome
The future: suffering will continue indefinitely
depressed affect and motivational changes are direct consequences of the primary triad
Thinking errors of depression (cognitive model)
patients tend to make logical errors in reasoning
Arbitrary inference: jump to conclusions
Selective abstraction: attend to negative and ignore other aspects of situations
Over generalizations: draw sweeping conclusions from minimal events
Dichotomous thinking: thinking in all or none terms
strengths of the cognitive model
Captures the fundamental problem of basing self worth or the sense of true value in personal experience
Intuitive appeal; clinical utility, effectiveness of intervention based on cognitive model.
Predictive validity
correlation between a score and a criterion outcome
Content validity
the items represent the target universe
Face validity
the extent to which a test is subjectively viewed as covering the concept it purports to measure
Concrete validity
concerns how well a set of indicators represent or reflect a concept that is not directly measurable
Principles for demonstrating construct validity
- Defined the construct implicitly, by a network of ideas about the construct. Constructs may be nearly descriptive . . . or very conceptual.
- These ideas must lead to testable hypotheses, predicted relationships among observable phenomena.
- The ideas (in 1) and hypotheses (in 2) must be explicit so evidence can be properly evaluated.
- Construct validity is not represented in a single number. Many types of evidence are relevant: content validity, predictive and concurrent validity (with diverse criteria), test-retest reliability, internal consistency (as well as more advanced psychometric properties)
- When a prediction fails, one or both of the following may be at fault: the test . . . modify the test — the network . . . modify the construct
- Evaluating the construct validity of a test is essentially no different to developing and testing theories.