mod 6 - Criminal Procedure Flashcards
1
Q
Criminal procedure
A
- criminal procedure is the law that sets the rules as to how criminal offences can be investigated, prosecuted and tried
2
Q
A. Investigation
A
- responsibility for the investigation of crimes rests largely with the police
- most investigations start with a complaint from a member of the public or as a result of the police themselves detecting evidence that a crime has been perpetrated
- police are given very broad powers of investigation and they can question witnesses and suspects, detain individuals, search places, seize items
- The law of criminal procedure seems to constrain the exercise of these powers
- if the police determine that a crime has probably been committed they are entitled to lay charges and arrest suspects
3
Q
B. Prosecution
A
- responsibility for the prosecution of crimes rest with the Crown attorney’s offices
- crowns are quasi-judicial officers whose task is to achieve justice, not to obtain a conviction (although they are frequently the same thing)
- crowns screen cases and prosecute only those cases that are in the public interest and for which there is a reasonable prospect of conviction
- prosecutor must disclose, all the evidence gathered in the police investigation, to the accused in advance of trial
4
Q
C. Trials
A
- in Ontario there are two trial courts: the Ontario court of justice and the superior court of justice
- most trials are before the judge alone in the Ontario court of justice
- some more serious charges are before the judge alone or the judge and the jury in the superior court of justice
- In a judge alone trial, the judge decides the facts
- in a jury case the jury decides the facts, the judge directs them as to the relevant law
5
Q
Trial options
A
- trial options are determined by the nature of the alleged offence
- there are three types of offences: Indictable, summary conviction, and hybrid
6
Q
Indictable
A
- indictable: felony offences, most serious (accused has right to decide if they want to be tried by judge or jury alone)
- accused sometimes has the right to a preliminary inquiry (court process meant to screen out frivolous prosecutions and can afford the accused an opportunity to probe the crown’s case, if a preliminary is held, the trial occurs in the superior court)
7
Q
Summary conviction
A
- summary conviction: the most minor offences (accused has no options, they will be tried by the judge alone)
- example public nudity
8
Q
Hybrid
A
- hybrid: can be tried either as indictment or summary conviction (prosecution gets to choose)
- once prosecution chooses, the accused has the trial options
9
Q
Defense (fights for accused)
A
- normally performed by private lawyers, personally paid by the accused or legal aid
- a narrow roll, directed exclusively at protecting the clients interests (subject to duties owed to the court)
- no duty to disclose defence case to prosecution
10
Q
A. Arbitrary detention
A
- the police often detain people when investigating offences
- meaning they assume control over the movement of a person either psychologically or physically
- little statutory regulation of this
- s. 9 of the charter protects against arbitrary detention
- arbitrary detentions occur lawfully when police stop all individuals to see if they are drinking and driving
11
Q
Arbitrary detention - exceptions
A
- however, the police do have the power to detain for investigative purposes when the detention is not arbitrary but also not authorized by powers of arrest
12
Q
Investigative detention
A
- police have the power to detain for investigative purposes when: they have reasonable grounds to detain, and the detention is reasonably necessary in the circumstances: the overall decision to detain is a reasonable one
13
Q
Reasonable grounds to detain
A
- A reasonable suspicion in all the circumstances that a person is connected to a particular crime
- there must be a clear nexus between the individual to be detained and a recent on-going criminal offence
- cannot be based on a hunch, or mere intuition
- not a high standard (higher than mere suspicion but lower than reasonable grounds to believe)
14
Q
detention must be reasonably necessary in the circumstances
A
- the detention must be of brief duration and cannot become a de facto arrest with all its accompanying restraint
15
Q
R. v. Mann
A
- two police officers received a radio dispatch message detailing a break and enter in progress in a neighbouring district of downtown Winnipeg
- suspect was described as a 21-year-old aboriginal male, approximately 5‘8“ tall, 165 pounds, clad in a black jacket with white sleeves
- as the officers approached the scene of the reported crime, they observed an individual walking casually along the sidewalk
- the officers stopped the appellant, Philip Mann, and asked him to identify himself
- they testified that the individual matched the description of the suspect to the tee (was not the suspect)
- during the pat down search, one officer felt a soft object in his pocket, the officer reached in to the pocket and found a small plastic bag containing marijuana (and two pills)
- The appellant was subsequently arrested and cautioned for the offence of possession for the purpose of trafficking marijuana
- they concluded they were reasonable grounds for protective search of the appellant
- however, the decision to go beyond this initial pat-down and reach into the appellant’s pocket was an unreasonable violation of the appellant’s reasonable expectation of privacy
- the seizure of the marijuana from the appellant was unlawful in this case