mod 1 Flashcards

1
Q

The categorical imperative

A

only follow the rules that are applied to everyone/ act only on those maxims which you can at once will to become universal laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Principle of utility

A

Actions are morally right as they tend to produce happiness, morally wrong if they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the golden rule

A

do onto others as you would have them do onto you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

principle of non-maleficence

A

avoid doing harm whenever possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

principle of autonomy

A

respect free decision of people who are mature and rational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Principle of beneficent

A

do good whenever possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

principle of justice

A

always try to be fair to all those who are affected by your actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which famous philosopher is normally associated with Utilitarianism

A

John Stewart mill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which famous philosopher is normally associated with Deotologcal ethics (duty based ethics)

A

kant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

which famous philosopher is normally associated with the theory of Virtue Ethics

A

Aristotle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

relationship between mortality and law

A

Mortality is not reducible by law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Metaethics

A

what we mean by “good, right” “bad, wrong” the nature of ethics, the study of its origin, and the meaning of ethical concepts. (language)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Normative ethics

A

study of ethical action. It values standards for the rightness and wrongness of actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Applied ethics

A

Consist of the analysis of specific moral issues that arise in life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what does an argument mean in philosophy, ethics, and logic?

A

an argument is when a group of statements. In which, the premises are claimed to provide support/reason to believe the conclusion is true.
two types:
1. good- premises support the conclusion.
2. bad- premises that don’t support the conclusion even though they claim to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a valid argument?

A

An argument is valid if and only if the premises make it impossible for them to be true and the conclusion to be false.

17
Q

what is a sound argument?

A

If the argument is valid and all the premises are true then it is sound. (valid+all true premises=sound)

18
Q

can a valid argument be unsound?

A

Only if it has one or more false premises.

19
Q

can an argument with all true premises and a true conclusion be unsound?

A

Yes. EX. humans are in London(true). Fred is in London.(true) Fred is human. (true). This may be true, but there are people all over the world not just in London so it is not a sound argument.

20
Q

what is the benefits argument?

A

if we can benefit someone without hurting another we out to do so.

21
Q

General principle in Teresa’s case?

A

Would it be right to remove Theresa’s organs causing her immediate death to save another baby’s life?

22
Q

Factual claim in Teresa’s case?

A

To remove her organs to save another child you are killing one to save another.

23
Q

Conclusion?

A

it is wrong to remove her organs in order to save another child.

24
Q

what is the argument that we should not use people as means?

A

taking Teresa’s organs is using her to benefit another and should not be done.

25
Q

what is the two main points Rachel claims to derive from the case studies?

A

reason and impartiality

26
Q

what is the minimum conception of morality presented by Rachels?

A

the effort to guide one’s conduct by reason–this is to do what is are the best reasons for doing