mod 1-4 Flashcards

midterm cards part 1

1
Q

Failing to do what I sense I should do for another person

A

Self-Betrayal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The problem of not knowing I have a problem. At the heart of most conflicts (willful blindness to our role in the problem)

A

Self-Deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When we no longer see people with their own needs, challenges, and objectives.

A

In the box

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how to get out of the box

A

Seeing people for who they really are- as people with needs, challenges, and objectives as important as our own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Self betrayal steps:
Entering the box steps

A
  1. Self Betrayal
  2. I begin to see the world through a lens that justifies my self-betrayal
  3. My view of reality becomes distorted
  4. I enter the box
  5. The box becomes characteristic of me that I carry around
  6. I provoke others into the box
  7. Collusion (mutual mistreatment and justifications)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Self Betrayal /enter the box step 1

A

Act contrary to what I sense i should do for another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self Betrayal /enter the box step 2

A

I begin to see the world through a lens that justifies my self-betrayal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Self Betrayal /enter the box step 3

A

My view of reality becomes distorted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Self Betrayal /enter the box step 4

A

I enter the box

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self Betrayal /enter the box step 5

A

The box becomes characteristic of me that I carry around

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self Betrayal /enter the box step 6

A

I provoke others into the box

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self Betrayal /enter the box step 7

A

Collusion (mutual mistreatment and justifications to give each other reasons to stay in the box)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stages of learning

A
  1. unconscious incompetence
  2. Conscious incompetence
  3. conscious competence
  4. unconscious competence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Learning stage 1.

A

Unconscious incompetence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Don’t know what you don’t know, can’t do what you can’t do

A

Unconscious incompetence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

learning stage 2

A

Conscious incompetence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

aware of what we can’t do, moving toward learning

A

Conscious incompetence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Learning stage 3

A

conscious competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Practice brings competence and learning

A

conscious competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

learning stage 4

A

Unconscious competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

habit of expectation
10,000 hour rule to become an expert

A

Unconscious competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

learning strategy of Tony Robbins

A

Connect the unknown to the known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Early family environment on conflict perception

A

A- Avoid, it’s terrible
B- battle to win at all costs
C- collaboratively solve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Lens model of conflict interaction

A

Self
Other
Relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Humans are listeners and storytellers
homo narrans
26
Three argumentative stances (Brockriede)
Rape/ Bully Seducer/manipulator lover/team player
27
In metaphorical argumentative stances, what are two motivators?
Power or Truth
28
The three I's, you cannot have a positive resolution with
1. Inanimate- unable/unwilling to communicate 2. Illogical- out of control emotionally 3. Immoral- no ethics
29
Stance in which one takes power, applies mental and physical sanctions, commands, and threats. victimizes. We can submit or fight back
Rape/ Bully/ abuser
30
The same person is targeted repeatedly by someone who has significant, existing power due to relationship dynamics. Almost never a way to escape
Metaphorical molestation or tormentor
31
Stance where the use of charms or lies to steer the situation, trick the person into assent. Indifferent to the harm of another person. You can submit or trick back
Seduction/ Manipulator
32
Stance: Work together to solve the problem. Treated equally as a person. Willing to risk not winning and not being right. No one feels like a victim.
Love /Team player
33
Conflict defined:
1. An expressed struggle 2. between interdependent parties 3. Who perceive incompatible goals 4. scarce resource 5. Interference achieving goals
34
When interdependent parties express a struggle over perceived incompatible goals, scarce sources, and interference with achieving a goal:
Conflict occurs (defined)
35
retaliation,
36
Gottman's Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
criticism defensiveness stonewalling contempt
37
Supportive climate
description problem oriented spontaneity openess empathy equiality provisionalism/flexible
38
defensive climate
Evaluation control strategy neutrality/impersonal superiority certainty/fixation
39
attacking character, dismantling their whole being
Criticism
40
When feeling unjustly accused, start fishing for excuses. Not taking their partner's concerns seriously and not taking responsibility
Defensiveness
41
With drawls from the interaction, shuts down, dosen't respond. Tune out, turn away, act busy, etc
Stonewalling
42
Truely being mean- disrespect, mocking, sarcasism, ridicule, name calling. Make them feel despised and worthless. or assumes position of moral superiority.
Contempt
43
stage between doing the wrong thing poorly to the right thing well
value of vulnerability
44
denial
45
Perception of conflict helps us understand their emotional reaction, which leads to their behavior
Metaphor of conflicts helps....
46
it compares two things that are different to deepen the level of understanding
metaphor/simile
47
Arguers as lovers stances see relationships as ________ or _________
unilateral or bilateral
48
genuine interaction
only available to lovers (open and given assent)
49
at the core of all conflict analysis
perception
50
internal strain that creates a state of ambivalence, conflicting internal dialogue, or lack of resolution in one’s thinking and feeling
intrApersonal conflict
51
expressed struggles become activated by a
trigger event
52
conflict in which parties have choices as opposed to conflict in which the power is so disparate that there are virtually no choices/ a “theory of precarious partnership”
strategic conflict
53
stuck in unproductive interdependence
gridlocked conflicts
54
any positively perceived physical, economic, or social consequence
a resource
55
any limited positively perceived physical, economic, or social consequence
perceived scarce resource
56
Two resources often perceived as scarce are: we often think the other person has more....
power and self-esteem
57
family relationships vocab
family of origin chosen family destructive marital conflict
58
the capacity for recognizing our own feelings and those of others, for motivating ourselves, and for managing emotions well in ourselves and in our relationships
emotional intelligence
59
deliberate practice of “moment-to-moment, nonjudgmental awareness, cultivated by paying attention in a specific way, that is, in the present moment, and as nonreactively, as nonjudgmentally, and as open heartedly as possible
mindfulness
60
If all participants are dissatisfied with the outcomes of a conflict and think they have lost as a result
Destructive conflicts.
61
The first moments of a conflict interaction
critical start-up
62
Continues to respond negatively to each other, intensifying as it continues...
Conflict Spiral
63
three parts of the escalatory spirals
1. the behaviors, 2. the perceptions of others, 3. the perceptions of the relationship
64
an active attempt to lessen dependence on each other. By making such an attempt, each party reduces the influence of the other on his or her choices. Both parties then become less invested in the relationship.
avodiance spirial
65
“fight” patterns.
escalatory spirals
66
one parter: opening discussion, dance around the topic asking questions "why" etc.. other partner: withdraws or minimizes
Attack/Withdraw Pattern /dance of intimacy
67
Three kinds of reciprocity
(1) low-intensity emotion is responded to in kind (e.g., anger is met with anger), (2) high-intensity emotion is met in kind (e.g., fury is met with fury), and (3) low-intensity emotion is met with high-intensity emotion (e.g., hurt is met with rage)
68
background system in which members avoided most conflict
Avoidant system
69
background system members used cooperation
Collaboration system
70
back ground style in which members engaged in overt yelling, calling of names, blaming, scapegoating, and similar aggressive moves.
Aggressive/Coercive Systems
71
"the cognitive, ethical, and perceptual frames of an individual” whats important , how things are related to people, what is more important in the universe, how people should act, etc
Worldview
72
intent does not equal
impact
73
two kinds of cultures exist:
individual and collectivistic
74