Mnemonic Devices Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Adverse Possession

A

ECHOES:
Entry (actual possession)
Continual
Hostile
Open
Exclusive
Statutory period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Creation of Easement

A

PING:
Prescription (COAH continuous open actual hostile)
Implication (created by operation of law, implied by preexisting use)
Necessity (no way out)
Grant (in writing, signed by holder, unless its duration is brief enough to be outside SOF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Termination of Easement

A

ENDCRAMP:
Estoppel (oral expression of intent to terminate easement PLUS writing (a release) or action (abandonment))
Necessity (if created by necessity, terminates when necessity ends)
Destruction (of servient land except by willful conduct of servient owner)
Condemnation (of servient estate by govt)
Release (in writing, given by the easement holder to the servient land)
Abandonment (by physical action, show intent to never use again)
Merger (title to easement and to servient land become vested in same person)
Prescription (COAH)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Specific Intent Crimes

A

Students Can Always Fake A Laugh, Even For Ridiculous Bar Facts:
Solicitation: Intent to have the person solicited commit the crime
Conspiracy: Intent to have the crime completed
Attempt: Intent to complete the crime
First degree premeditated murder: Premeditated intent to kill
Assault: Intent to commit a battery
Larceny: Intent to permanently deprive the other of their interest in the property taken
Embezzlement: Intent to defraud
False pretenses: Intent to defraud
Robbery: Intent to permanently deprive the other of their interest in the property taken
Burglary: Intent to commit a felony in the dwelling
Forgery: Intent to defraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statute of Frauds (when is writing required)

A

MYLEGS:
M (marriage – promises in consideration of)
Y (a promise that by its terms cannot be performed within 1 year from agreement to date of performance)
L (land sales)
E (executors: if an executor of an estate is to pay estate debts out of their own personal funds)
G (goods for $500+)
S (sureties: a promise made by a third person to a creditor that the third person will be responsible for the debt that the debtor owes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Does the burden of the covenant run with the land?

A

WITHN:
Writing (original promise must have been in writing)
Intent (original parties must have intended that covenant would run with the land)
Touch and concern: The promise must affect the parties’ legal relations as landowners
Horizontal AND vertical privity
Notice: The successor (A1) must have had notice of the promise when she took

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does the benefit of the covenant run with the land?

A

WITV:
Writing
Intent
Touch and Concern
Vertical Privity between B and B1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Equitable Servitude creation

A

WITNess:
W: Writing, Generally, but not always, the original promise was in writing
I: Intent, The original parties intended that the promise would be enforceable by and against successors
T: Touch and concern, The promise affects the parties as landowners
N: Notice, Subsequent purchasers of land burdened by the covenant had actual, inquiry, or record notice of the covenant when they acquired the land. (usually involves a recording act)
ESS: for equitable servitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does the burden of the equitable servitude run with the land?

A

INT:
Intent (to run with the land to future owners, safe to assume),
Notice (constructive/record, inquiry, actual),
Touch and Concern (is the agreement related to use of the land)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does the benefit of the equitable servitude run with the land?

A

IT:
Intent
Touch and Concern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lawful execution of deed

A

WIDS:
Words of intent
Identification of parties
Description (unambiguous)
Signed by grantor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

6 covenants in General Warranty Deed

A

Surely, Cats Eat Quail With Fish
Seisin: grantor owns at delivery
(Right to) Convey: grantor has power to transfer
(Against) Encumbrances: no servitudes or liens
Quiet enjoyment: that there are no 3rd party lawful claims
Warranty: grantor will defend grantee against any claims of title by others
Further assurances: grantor will perfect (that grantor is a good faith cooperator and will perfect the title if it turns out to be imperfect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Priority of proceeds of foreclosure sale

A

EPJM
Expenses of sale, attorney’s fees, court costs
Principal (and accrued interest on loans)
Junior (junior lieners or junior interests)
Mortgagor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tenant Duties

A

MRWTR (Mr. Water)
-Maintain premises in good condition
-make Routine repairs other than ordinary wear and tear repair
-don’t commit Waste
-T may terminate the lease when premises are destroyed without T’s fault
-pay Rent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Landlord Duties

A

DHDQ (Don’t Hit, Don’t Quit)
Deliver possession
Habitability
Deposits
Quiet Enjoyment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Warrant Exceptions

A

SAPCSH (sneaky cops always have small penises)
Search incident to constitutional arrest
Consent
Automobile exception
Hot pursuit, evanescent evidence, and emergency aid
Stop and frisk
Plain view

17
Q

Criminal case, evidence of prior bad acts are never admissible to prove that D acted unlawfully again – but may be admissible for other purposes

A

MIMIC
motive, intent, absence of mistake, identity, common plan or scheme

18
Q

5 methods of impeachment

A

o Prior inconsistent statement: does not come in for general proposition, only to impeach, unless it is given under oath and as part of a trial/hearing, then it comes in also as substantive evidence
o Bias or motive to misrepresent: always allowed, even allow extrinsic evidence to prove it
o Prior convictions:
 Crime involving dishonesty or false statement (e.g. perjury): must be admitted
 Serious crime (felony, punishable by more than 1 year): admissible if within 10 years and as long as probative value not outweighed by prejudicial effect
o Specific acts of misconduct which bear on truthfulness: no extrinsic evidence allowed
o Bad reputation in community for untruthfulness: extrinsic evidence allowed

19
Q

Always substantive (for Erie)

A

CESTS ()
(1) Choice of Law rules
(2) Element of claim or defense
(3) Statutes of Limitations
(4) Tolling for S.O.L.s
(5) Standard for new trial bc jury’s damages were excessive or inadequate

20
Q

Fairness factors for PJ

A

DPFIF ()
(1) Burden on D
(2) P’s interests (e.g. injured in forum state, wants to sue at home)
(3) Forum state’s interest in litigating this type of claim
(4) Interstate interest in efficient adjudication
(5) Furtherance of social policies