MMC Part 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Managerial compensation model

P=a-Q
Ri = (a-qi-q)qi
πi = Ri - cqi

What is manager compensation (Mi)

A

Mi = μi[(aiπ + (1-ai)Ri]

Where μi is a fraction of a linear combination of profit and revenue.
ai can either be 0 or 1. 0 means max revenue, 1 means max profits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If economic theory is correct then what should ai be?

A

ai = 1 (manager compensation should be based solely upon profits)

However in reality we see manager compensation/incentives do not strictly align with profits of firm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Managerial compensation can be seen as a 2 stage game:

What are the stages

A

1st: owner of each firm chooses μi (the fraction of performance based pay) and ai (weighting of profits vs revenue) to maximise profit

2nd: take μi, ai, qj given and manager chooses output qi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Start from 2nd stage, what should happen then

A

We want to find qi and qj, to add qi+qj to get Q, which we can then also find price as P=a-Q
1. Choose qi (as mentioned) to maximise Mi

Mi = μi(a-qi-qj)qi - aicqi
Which is revenue - costs i.e profit

  1. FOC respect to qi, solve to find qi. Qj will be the same by symmetry.

… final equation for Q = 2a-c(ai+aj) / 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intuition of Q expression if ai/j decreases

B) How can we find P?

C) what happens to price if ai/j decreases

A

If aij decreases i.e owner places less importance on maximisng profit, industry output and profit increase

B) P=a-Q , so just sub Q in,

C) we see price falls as owners weight profit maximisation less, and more about revenue. So produce more output, and see in our equation, as Q increase, price falls!

(Remember from a level, in general increasing revenue is better by lowering price to increase sales!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Then we have the first stage: owner chooses μi and ai to maximise profits.

Thus what to they choose?

A

They can set μ as low s they wish, so assume μ=0 so Mi=0

  1. So just normal maximise profit,
    πo = (p-c)qi
  2. Sub in our values of P and qi from 2nd stage!!!
  3. then FOC respect to ai, to get response function
    ai = 6c-a-caj/ 4c

(So first stage choose output qi (also find P and Q), 2nd stage max profit by subbing them into simple profit max)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

so response function:

ai = 6c-a-caj/ 4c

intuition

A

If owner of firm i places more weight on revenue (decreased a) , owner of firm j will increase aj, weighting profits more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

So if ai falls, aj increases. (i weights revenue more means j weights profit more)

so what happens if aj=1

A

Means they maximise profits

using ai = 6c-a-caj/ 4c
set aj=1 we get
ai = 5c-a/ 4c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When ai=1 what can we interestingly find for qi?

A

qi = a-c/ 2

In response to firm j profit maximising (aj=1), it produces standard cournot quantity.

firm i responds by producing monopoly quantity! (working pg 10), sub our ai into qi, and qj into the new qi.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Then we can solve response function (ai= 6c-a-caj/ 4c)
How? And final answer
b) intuition

A

Solve RF means ai=aj=a*, so solve.

Final answer ai=aj=6/5 - a/5c

b) since expressed in c, so as unit cost increases, ai=aj is larger, so more weighting towards maximising profits!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is output of firm i (when maximise combination of profits and revenue) higher than standard cournot?

A

Yes 2(a-c)/5 > qi = a-c/3 (cournot)

2(a-c)/5 by subbing the solved response function into qi BR function qi = a-qj/2 -aic/2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Next model; production in teams

Output of firm depends on effort levels of all workers in team. What is problem

A

Free rider problem - some may not do work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Assume research lab, product with future value V

Team has N workers
Effort ei

Prod function V = Σ N √ei
Value is a function of the sum of square root effort!

Scientist earn wi
ΣWi = v (sum of wages = future value!)

What do u think utility would be

A

Ui = wi - e

Wage - effort just like seen previously!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assumptions for production with teams model (2)

A

Colleagues can observe each others effort
Collude to maximise their utilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

So what is wage

A

We said
Σw = V

I.e Nw=V
So w = V/N

17
Q

Now utility max problem, solve it

A
  1. Max u = wi - ei So
    Max u = V/N - ei

Then recall production function V = ΣN √ei
So
Max u = N√ei /N - ei

  1. Then FOC in order to find optimal effort level e*
    Final answer e* = 1/4

So if workers collude to maximise their utilities, they each exert effort 1/4

18
Q

What is optimal future value V*?

A

V = N√ei

When ei = 1/4
V = N x 1/2 = N/2

19
Q

But in the real world they often do not collude, scientists maximise own utility taken their collegues effort as given.

What is the optimal e* if they do not collude

B) Intuition?

A

e* = 1/4N²

Makes sense as when N=1 we get our optimal effort level e*=1/4 , as previous!

B) more N we see effort decreases, proving free-riding!

20
Q

So previously with collusion V*= N/2

What about V equation now

B) what happens to utility as N increases

A

V = N√e = N√1/4N²

B) as N increases, utility falls
Ui = V/N - e = 1/2N - 1/1N²
(Wage - effort)

21
Q

How to solve freeriding?

A

Mechanism that induces workers to put in optimal effort i.e if team achieves V* (optimal future value) , each scientist receives V*/N, otherwise if not receive 0

22
Q

Next mode: Regulating a firm under unknown cost

Assume gov decides price of product e.g telecommunications.

Running costs of firm are unknown to gov.
Firm reports it truthfully or not
Gov decides price and subsdiy to cover any fixed cost

What is issue with this

A

Firm has incentive to lie and claim it has high costs, when it is actually low. So gov will let them set a high price, and increase profits!

23
Q

What is issue with this incentive

A

Welfare loss P=MC is maximise welfare, but instead they set a higher price.

So need to find a way for firms to truthfully reveal real cost

24
Q

Model:
Demand p=a-Q
MC: either cH or cL
Firm declares c^ (declared MC)

What is our
A) True profit expression
B) Declared profit expression

A

True profits are

π(c) = (p(c) − c)(α − p(c)) + s(c*)

S(c*) is subsidy
Declared profits

π(cˆ) = (p(cˆ) − c∗)(α − p(cˆ)) + s(cˆ)

25
In range P(cL) to P(cH) the gov can choose:
A unique price (compromise price if separation too costly Price separation (different prices for depending on reported costs Cl and Ch )
26
How does mechanism work
Firms must have incentive to truthfully reveal its type, in order to make non-negative profits.
27
How can truthfulness getting non-negative profits be expressed
For both high cost p(cH) − cH)(α − p(cH)) + s(cH) ≥ 0 And low cost (p(cL) − cL)(α − p(cL)) + s(cL) ≥ 0 Telling the truth makes non-negative profits
28
How can incentive to be truthful be expressed
For high cost firm: (p(cH) − cH)(α − p(cH)) + s(cH) > (p(cL) − cH )(α − p(cL)) + s(cL) Truthfully declaring high cost, to get P(cH) , must earn more profit than if it were to claim low cost and get P(cL). For a low cost firm (p(cL) − cL)(α − p(cL)) + s(cL) > (p(cH) − cL)(α − p(cH)) + s(cH) Truthfully declaring low cost to get P(cL), must earn more profit than claiming high cost in order to get P(cH).
29
How does this design maximise welfare
As P=MC so CS maximised.