Mixed methods Flashcards

1
Q

Mixed Methodologies

Uses both qualitative and quantitative methods in one study.
  • Mixed methodologies are also known as multiple, combined or blended methods research or mixed strategy or multi-strategy research
A
  • fits the paradigm pragmatism.
  • strengthens the research by drawing on the positive aspects of both interpretivism and positivism.
  • Combining of methods is also known as triangulation.
  • Particular approach to use and when should be determined by the study’s aims and objectives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Models of mixed methods research

mixing could occur during data collection, data analysis or when the findings are interpreted.

A
  • The purpose of the study
  • The priority to be given to the approaches
  • Theoretical perspective to be taken
  • Resources available
  • Researcher expertise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Three main types of models:

A
  • Parallel: qualitative and quantitative components are carried out at the same time but the findings are not synthesised until both sets of data have been analysed separately.
  • Sequential: the qualitative and quantitative elements are undertaken separately, and one leads to and informs the other.
  • Embedded: when one component is embedded within the other component.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Advantages of mixed methods research

  • More practical approach
  • May reveal new knowledge
  • Cost effective
A
  • Enables researchers to explore different perspective in one study
  • Allows researchers to explore different aspects of a complex phenomena in one study
  • Holistic approach
  • Draws on the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative research and reduces their impact of any weakness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Disadvantages of mixed methods research

A
  • Both research methods are such that they cannot be mixed
  • Power struggles between the research team
  • More time consuming
  • Findings may be complex, it is essential that the essence of the data is not lost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Factors to consider:

A
  • Research skills training before the study begins is essential
  • Length of time for each element.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Surveys:
Underpinning philosophy of a survey will be influenced by the approach taken

Can provide data and can take a quantative approach with the collection of quantifiable data from a large representative sample

A
  • Descriptive survey: this aims to describe as accurately as possible the situation as it is
  • Explanatory/analytical survey: to establish cause and effect relationships or associations between variables without the use of experimental manipulation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Advantages of Surveys::

A
  • Can be used to research a range of topics/ fewer ethical implications
  • Can be efficient, cost effective and relatively economical to carry out
  • Can be used to collect data from a wide geographical area
  • Can be generalised, promoting validity/ can be replicated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Limitations of Surveys:

A
  • Validity is influenced by the sampling strategy used
  • More quantative data/ difficult to assess validity and reliability
  • Carried out without planning or design/ low response rate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Action Research

A

Known as participatory, collaborative research
It seeks transformative change , problem solving approach through the simultaneous process of taking action and doing research, which are linked together by critical reflection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Action research tends to be:

A
  • Cyclical- similar steps tend to recur, in a similar sequence;
  • Participative – the clients and informants are involved as partners, or at least active participants, in the research process;
  • Qualitative – it deals more often with language than with numbers; and reflective – critical reflection upon the process and outcomes are important parts of each cycle.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The cyclic process of action research

A

Begins when a problem is identified and try to solve the problem and 4 key stages

  • Assess: nature and extent of the problem
  • Plan: an intervention or change is identified which will address the problem
  • Implement: Intervention or change is implemented
  • Evaluate: impact of change is evaluated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The cyclic process of action research

A

Strength: Can promote team working. Established mechanism for developing care and service provision. Enables ownership

Limitations: Implementation of change can be undertaken without making into a study and knowing when to end the research may be a problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Historical Research

A
  • Historical research is a qualitative technique. Historical research studies the meaning of past events in an attempt to interpret the facts and explain the cause of events, and their effect in the present events.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Historical Research

A
  • Involves the collection of data that relate to people, places and events in the past.-
  • Data should be analysed in the context of social, cultural, religious, economic
  • Duty of care to data sources, anonymity maintained
  • May not provide sufficient information about the methodological approach
  • Helps us learn about the past and explain the present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Historical Research

A
    • Qualative approach as they don’t know where the investigation will take them
  • Often supports a common thesis that an informed understanding of history provides insights that can contribute effective approaches to current professional issues.
17
Q

Systematic review

A
  • Type of literature review that uses systematic methods to collect secondary data, evaluate and summarise papers on a topic and synthesize findings qualitatively or quantitatively.
18
Q

Advantages of systematic review

A
  • Saves practitioners time in conducting their own search of papers
  • Health professionals can keep up to date with practice area with the review, but they do not always provide an answer to a clinical problem
    Could highlight the need for more research on a particular topic and caution practitioners
  • Can remove all possible bias providing more plausible results
19
Q

Uses of a systematic review

A
  • Keep up to date with the latest research/determine if new treatments are effective
  • Underpin clinical guideline development/inform treatment and care decisions
  • Avoid wasting research resources on topics where evidence is clear
    Determine if treatments are harmful, not worth the cost / support a bid for funding
20
Q

A quantative systematic review

A
  • Is secondary research.
  • It focuses on the results of the primary research and may involve an assessment of intervention. Integrate data resulst in the form of meta-analysis.
21
Q

A qualitative systematic review

A
  • Draws on primary research, can take the form of an analysis of an interview, discussion, observation to make sure the results can be combined in a meaningful way.
    Results are combined using meta synthesis
22
Q

Systematic review process:

All research will be read and assessed for validity, reliability and lack of bias and quality and data will be pooled together and treated as one study (should be rigorous and transparent)

A
  • The process of producing a systematic review is similar to the evidence based practice process which is to assess, ask, acquire, appraise and apply
  • Tries to uncover new evidence. Usually arises when there is a therapeutic dilemma that is a disagreement and produced by a team of authors as it is time consuming
23
Q

Stages in the systematic review process

A
  1. Construct a focused clinical question
  2. Identify a search strategy/3.study selection criteria and procedures
  3. Assess the quality of the included papers/
  4. data extraction 6.Meta-anaylsis
24
Q

PICO

A

Patient, population or target problem at hand
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome