Misrepresentation Flashcards

1
Q

What is actionable misrepresentation?

A

A false statement off act which induces a party to enter a contract (this happens before contract is formed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If there is misrepresentation what happens to the contract?

A

It becomes voidable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What governs misrepresentation?

A

Common law

Misrepresentation act 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the criteria to help establish misrepresentation?

A

A false statement of fact or law
Which is made before the contract is formed
And it must induce the claimant who relied upon it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a statement of law or fact NOT?

A

Statement of opinion
Sales talk/puffs
Statements of future intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case is relevant to statement of opinion?

A

Bissett v Wilkinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Facts of Bissett v Wilkinson

A

C purchased land from D after D said it would suitable for 2000 sheep
After purchase C later found the land could not hold that many sheep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outcome of Bissett v Wilkinson

A

The court found that this was a statement of opinion rather than fact because D had no knowledge of sheep farming it was an opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case related to sales talk does not amount to a statement of fact

A

Dimmock v Hallet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Facts of Dimmock v Hallet

A

D described the land as ‘improbable and fertile’ during the sale of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outcome of Dimmock v Hallet

A

The courts described this as a puff rather than a representation, therefore it could not amount to a statement of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain how statements of future intention and misrepresentation…

A

The general rule is that it cannot be a fact if it is about the future as it has not happened yet
However, if someone has knowledge that it will happen then it can amount to a misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case is relevant to statements of future intention…

A

Edgington v Fitzmaurice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Facts of Edgington v Fitzmaurice

A

C was a shareholder in a business
He received a request for a loan from D to help grow the business
It was in fact to pay off his loans
C sought repayment of money on the grounds of misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outcome of Edgington v Fitzmaurice

A

It amounted to misrepresentation because it was an untrue intention as to the future of the money and what was going to happen to it
Therefore it was a misrepresentation and the money should be paid back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What format can misrepresentation make?

A

Writing
Orally
Conduct
NOT silence

17
Q

What case is relevant to the format of misrepresentation?

A

Spice girls v Aprilla World Service

18
Q

Facts of Spice girls v Aprilla World Service

A

Aprilla contracted the spice girls on May 6th 1998 to sponsor a concert tour
On May 29th 1998 Geri left the group

19
Q

Outcome of Spice girls v Aprilla World Service

A

Aprilla stated the contract was based on the representation they would all work together.
Because she left, there was a misrepresentation by conduct

20
Q

What case is related to the point that misrepresentation must be made before the contract is formed?

A

Attwood v Small

21
Q

Facts of Attwood v Small

A

C was purchasing a mine and was told exaggerated statements about its capacity by D
C got this checked but their expertise erroneously said they were correct
6 months later they found out it was wrong and sought to rescind the contract

22
Q

Outcome of Attwood v Small

A

Court held there has been no misrepresentation because they did not rely on the representation by the vendor
They relied on the verification of their agents

23
Q

What are the three types of misrepresentation?

A

Innocent
Negligent
Fraudulent

24
Q

What is innocent misrepresentation? What remedies are available?

A

When D genuinely believes the representation is true and has reasonable grounds for that belief
Remedy = recession or damages

25
Q

What is negligent misrepresentation? Remedies?

A

D should know what they are doing will amount to a misrepresentation however they are ignorant (reword this)

Recession/damages

26
Q

What governs negligent misrepresentation?

A

Common law

Misrepresentation act

27
Q

What does the misrepresentation act state about negligent misrepresentation?

A

Negligent misrepresentation is a statement without reasonable grounds for belief in its truth
Burdens of proof is on D
Contract is required
special relationship is not required

28
Q

Negligent misrepresentation under common law…

A

Burden of proof on claimant
No contract required
Special relationship is required

29
Q

What case is relevant to negligent misrepresentation under common law?

A

Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Partners

30
Q

Facts of Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Partners

A

C (an advertising agency) ask D (a bank) for a reference about one of their customers
D said customer would be able to meet financial obligations
Customer did not

31
Q

Outcome of Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Partners

A

The statements could amount to negligent misinterpretation because they carelessly made a false statement that c relied upon

32
Q

What is a special relationship

A

At least 1 party has some special relationship and they can tell the other party will rely on this info

33
Q

What is fraudulent misrepresentation? Remedies?

A

Burden of proof lies in the claimant
Lord Herschell defined it as ‘knowing to be false, without belief it was true’
Recession/damages

34
Q

What case is relevant to fraudulent misrepresentation?

A

Derry v Peek

35
Q

Facts of Derry v Peek

A

Lord Herschell defined fraudulent negligence as ‘a statement knowing to be false, without belief it us true’

36
Q

What are the restrictions to the availability of recession?

A

Affirmation: a party has implied they wish to continue with contract
Laps of time: if too long it can be seen as affirmation
Rights if third party: if 3rd party has gained bona fida rights property then it won’t be available
It is impossible e.g subject matter has changed
Damages is more suitable remedy

37
Q

What is recession? What type of remedy?

A

It is an equitable remedy which aims to put the parties the position they were in before the contract started