misrepresentation Flashcards
what is the definition of misrepresentation
is a vitiating factor that makes a contract voidable.
the victim can rescind the contract
what does is state under common law about misrepresentation
misrepresentation occurs during the
formation of a contract & involves a false
statement of material fact made by a
party to the contract that induces the
other party to enter a contract
what is meant by false statement of material facts
means something untrue (Fletcher v Krell)
however sellers aren’t under a general
duty to disclose relevant facts
Silence
cannot be false statement (Fletcher v
Krell) unless representer remains silent
when a statement that was initially true
then becomes untrue (With v O’Flanagan)
Half-truth
can be misrepresentation (Dimmock v
Hallett)
Opinion
cannot be an opinion (Bisset v Wilkinson)
Conduct
can be made through conduct/
circumstances as well as words
(Spice Girls v Aprilia
if there has been a false statement
false statement must induce the other
party to entered the contract
meaning it must be relied on by the
claimant (Attwood v Small, Redgrave v
Hurd), but does not have to be the only
reason for entering the contract
Edrington v Fitzmaurice
Insurance contracts
consumer insurance contract are of
utmost good faith. Answer to all the
questions must be answered honestly
(The Consumer Insurance (Disclose &
representations Act 2012), modifying the
decision made in Lambert v Co op
What happens if a consumer deliberately lies and if they didn’t know they had to disclose some information
insurance company can avoid the
contract & keep any instalments paid.
If consumer doesn’t realise they should’ve
disclosed the information the insurance is
still valid but payout is reduced by
amount company undercharged
false statement of future intentions
Is NOT a false statement of fact HOWEVER
false statement of future intention will be
a false statement of fact if maker of
statement has no intention to carry it out
Edgington v Fitzmaurice
Fraudulent
(knowingly or recklessly wrong— Derry v
Peek) where remedy is rescission&
damages in the tort of deceit (East v
Maurer)
Negligence
(Carelessly wrong as defined in Hedley
Bryne v Heller) remedy is rescission (The
Wagon Mound) and/ or damages s2(2) of
the misrepresentation act 1967
innocent
(honestly wrong) s2(1) o the
misrepresentation act 1967 remedy is
rescission (Long v Lloyd) OR damages s2.
(2) of the misrepresentation act 1966
what is s2(1) of the misrepresentation act 1967
once c proves there has been a
misrepresentation the burden of proof is
on the person making statement that
there was reasonable grounds to believe
the statement was true . if reasonable
grounds can’t be proven the statement is
negligence
Recession
not awarded if impossible
innocent part decides to continue with contract despite being aware of misrepresentation
right to rescind is lost
LONG v Lloyd
what does the case of Leaf v International Galleries establish
innocent party delays bringing claim the
right to rescind is lost
what does the case of Lewis v Averay establish
Right to rescind is lost when a 3rd party gains rights over property
What is said about an omission and misrepresentation
in consumer contracts where information
id deliberately left out or presented in an
unclear way CONSUMER PROTECTION
REGULATION 2008&2014 sets out right to
‘unwind’ contract which is the statutory
equivalent to rescission