misrepresentation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is misrepresentation

A

false statement of fact by which representer induces represented to enter the contract
- makes the contract voidable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

is a puffery a misrep actionable

A

no - cannot be verified objectively
- gimmick v wallet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

can statements of opinion be actionable

A

not normally actionable. as long as they appear to be nothing more than an opinion-
- bisset v wilkinson

exception
- an apparent statement of opinion or belief can imply that the person making the statement has a factual basis for that opinion or belief.
- boundary between fact and opinion may depend Jon balance of knowledge between parties eg an expert
- smith v land and house property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

can statements of future intention be actionable

A

generally not because it is not an existing fact.
- intrepreneur Pub v Sweeney
if the statement was fraudulent, then the representer has made a misrep to their state of mind which is an existing fact and therefore actionable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is failure to reveal facts a misrepresentation

A

general rule- no obligation to reveal facts- Keats v Earl of Cadogan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happens if a statement becomes false between the time it was negotiated and made.

A

must give notice of a change in statement or it might result in an actionable misrep.-
- With v O’Flanagan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the exceptions to the general rule on. failure to reveal facts

A
  1. conduct- Spice girls v Aprilia world service - conduct can indicate certain impression which if it is failure is a misrep.
  2. defects being deliberatly hidden.- Schneider v Heath.
  3. half true statments- dimmock v hallett
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the difference between a half true statement and a changed circumstance situ

A

both true when made, half true is concealed facts and changed situ becomes untrue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what special contacts require a duty to reveal info

A
  • insurance contracts
  • fiduciary relationships (solicitor and client)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the requirement of inducement for a false representation to be actionable

A

the representer must have been induced.
1. statement does not have to be the only reason for entering the contract
2. fraudulent misrep- must have been ‘materially influenced’ by the statement
3. non-fraudulent misrep- but for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

if a statement isn’t believed to be true, is it capable of being an inducement.

A

Hayward v Zurich insurance company.
- it might be possible,
if the statement is verified by an expert or a 3rd party, inducement is far less likely
- even if they are given the opportunity to verify but doesn’t take it, statement can still be inducement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the effect of a misrep

A

it makes the contract voidable, continues in effect until the representer elects to affirm or rescind the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is rescission

A

the basic remedy following an actionable breach. - means restoring the pre-contract position, putting parties back to where they would have been if he contract had not been entered into to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how can a contract be rescinded

A
  1. innocent party must communicate an intention to rescind.- give notice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the bars to rescission.

A
  1. affirmation- when the innocent party shows intention to carry on
  2. lapse of time- the innocent party takes too long to rescind
  3. impossibility of restitution- not possible to restore the parties to their original position
  4. supervening third party rights - when the rights of an innocent 3rd party prevent rescission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

long v Lloyd

A

authority of affirmation being a bar to rescission

17
Q

what is the rule for lapse of time

A
  • fraud misrep- time at which the fraud is discovered. lapse of time can evidence them affirming contract
  • negligent misrep- time at which misrep Is discovered
  • innocent misrep- time at which the contract comes into effect
18
Q

if the bars to rescission do apply, is this final

A

no the courts might find power to refuse it.
misrepresentation act 1967.

19
Q

what is a fraudulent misrepresentation and the damages available

A

TORT OF DECEIT
DERRY V PEEK
- where there has been a false representation made, knowingly, recklessly or carelessly whether it be true or false.
damages available
-Doyle v Olby
- all direct loss irrespective of foreseeability
- contributory negligence reduction doesn’t not apply

20
Q

what is the negligence and what damages are available

A

TORT OF NEGLIGENCE
reliance loss based on the contract not having bee made.
- reasonably foreseeable loss
- contributory negligence does apply

21
Q

what is innocent misrep and what damages are available?

A

expectation measure- as if the statement had been true
- likely to Best wishes reasonably foreseeable loss.
contributory negligence reduction does apply

22
Q

what is the contributory negligence reduction

A
23
Q

what is s.2(1) of the misrep act 1967 and what damages are available

A

the act introduced its own version of negligent misrep that applies between parties that have a contract
- liable for damages if the representor cannot disprove negligence by showing he or she had reasonable grounds for making the statement
- based on the contract not having been made
- all direct loss irrespective of forseeability
- contributory negligence does apply