Misleading Justice Flashcards

1
Q

Perjury
S108(1) CA61
Legislation

A
  • A witness making any
  • assertion as to a matter of fact, opinion, belief, or knowledge
  • in a judicial proceeding
  • forming part of that witness’s evidence on oath
  • known by that witness to be false, and
  • intended to mislead the tribunal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fabricating Evidence
S113 CA61
Elements

A

With intent to mislead any tribunal holding any judicial proceeding to which section 108 applies, fabricates evidence by any means other than perjury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Witness

Definition

A

A witness is a person who gives evidence and is able to be cross-examined in a proceeding.

This includes a person who is actively engaged in the process of giving evidence and/or one who has previously given evidence. The term witness also includes a person who will give evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Assertion

Definition

A

This is something declared or stated positively, often with no support or attempt made at furnishing evidence or proof of the assertion’s accuracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Matter of Fact

Definition

A

A fact is a thing done, an actual occurrence or event, and it is presented during court proceedings in the form of witness testimony and evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Opinion

Definition

A

S4 Evidence Act 06

Opinion, in relation to a statement offered in evidence, means a statement of opinion that tends to prove or disprove a fact.

A statement of an opinion is not admissible in a proceeding, except as provided by section 24 and 25 of the Evidence Act 2006.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Opinion evidence of lay witnesses

Legislation

and when opinion evidence is permissible

A

S24 Evidence Act 06

A witness may state an opinion in evidence in a proceeding if that opinion is necessary to enable the witness to communicate, or the fact-finder to understand, what the witness saw, heard, or otherwise perceived

Under this section, lay witnesses are routinely permitted to give evidence concerning:

  • apparent age
  • identity,
  • physical and emotional state of people,
  • condition of articles (worn, used, or new),
  • speed,
  • whether a person is under the influence of drink.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Belief

Definition

A

A subjective feeling regarding the validity of an idea or set of facts. It is more than mere suspicion and less than knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Knowledge

Definition

A

“Knowing” means “knowing, or correctly believing” … the belief must be a correct one, where the belief is wrong a person cannot know something:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Oath

Definition

A

This is a declaration before a person who has authority to administer an oath, which invokes some religious belief and says that a thing is true or right. For example, a Christian would swear an oath on the Bible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Affirmation

Definition

A

This is a verbal or written declaration, before a person who has authority to administer an oath, saying that a thing is true or right without reference to religious belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Declaration - witness under 12

What is this also called

A

A witness under 12 years old may make a declaration, which is a promise to tell the truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Perjury

When is offence complete

and no defence

A

At the time the false evidence is given accompanied by an intention to mislead the tribunal.

There is no defence where the witness later recants and informs the tribunal of the falsity of the earlier evidence given.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Corroboration
S121 Evidence Act 06

(1) It is not necessary in a criminal proceeding for the evidence on which the prosecution relies to be corroborated, except with respect to the offences of—

A

(a) perjury (section 108 of the Crimes Act 1961); and
(b) false oaths (section 110 of the Crimes Act 1961); and
(c) false statements or declarations (section 111 of the Crimes Act 1961); and
(d) treason (section 73 of the Crimes Act 1961).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conspiring to defeat justice
S116 CA61
Elements

A

Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conspiring to defeat justice

Examples

A
  • preventing a witness from testifying.
  • wilfully going absent as a witness.
  • threatening or bribing witnesses.
  • concealing the fact an offence has been committed.
  • intentionally giving police false information to obstruct their inquiries.
  • supplying false information to probation officers.
  • assisting a wanted person to leave the country.
  • arranging a false alibi.
  • threatening or bribing jury members.
17
Q

Investigative Procedure

Guidelines

A
  • You may only commence a prosecution for perjury (civil or criminal), where it is recommended by the courts or you are directed to do so by the COMMISSIONER of Police. You may, however, begin inquiries into an allegation of perjury without reference to the court or Commissioner of Police.
  • COMPLAINTS of perjury can arise in two ways:
  • An individual may complain that someone has perjured themselves.
  • A Judge may state or direct in a court recommendation that the police undertake inquiries into the truth of the evidence given by a witness
18
Q

When can you start a prosecution for perjury

A

Where it is recommended by the courts or you are directed to do so by the Commissioner of Police.

19
Q

The two main points to be covered when interviewing a suspect in respect of perjury are:

A
  • whether the suspect knew their assertion was false, and

* whether they intended to mislead the tribunal governing proceedings.