Miscellaneous Torts and General considerations (Nuisance) Flashcards
Private Nuisance
Substantial, unreasonable interference with another private individuals’ use or enjoyment of property that he possesses or has a right to possesses
MBE: look for “substantial” or “unreasonable” interference as the right answer choice
Differs from trespass b/c this is interference with USE OR ENJOYMENT, not interference with exclusive possession
Substantial Interfernce
offensive, inconvenient, or annoying to the AVERAGE PERSON in the community
NOT substantial if due to P’s mere hypersensitivity or specialized use of property
Unreasonable interference
severity of injury must outweigh utility of D’s conduct
aslo could be shown through intent or negligence
Public Nuisance
unreasonable interference with the health, safety, or property rights of the community
Ex: using building for prostitution
Private party may recover only if he suffers UNIQUE DAMAGES NOT SUFFERED BY THE PUBLIC at large
Legislative Authority
legislative authority for the nuisance activity is not an absolute defense, but persuasive
Conduct of others
no one actor is liable for all damage caused by concurrence of his acts and others (pollution)
Contributory Negligence
generally not a defense unless P’s case rests on a negligence theory
Coming to the nuisance
“come to the nuisance” (e.g. purchasing land next to an already existing nuisance) is generally NOT a bar to P’s action unless she came to the nuisance for the sole purpose of bringing a lawsuit
Respondeat Superior
master/employer liable for torts committed by servant/employee within the scope of employment
Frolic and Detour
Frolic: minor deviation from employer’s business for own purposes is still acting within the scope of employment
Detour: a substantial deviation in time or geographic area. Cuts off liability
Intentional torts and vicarious liability
generally NOT within scope of employment
Exceptions: (1) force authorized in employment (bouncer); (2) friction is generated by the employment (bill collector); or (3) employee is furthering the business of the employer (removing customers forcibly)
Negligent Supervision
employers may be liable for their own negligence by negligently selecting or supervising their employees
NOT vicarious liability, its their own liability
Independent Contractor
generally NOT liable for tortious acts of independent contractors.
Exceptions: (1) if independent contractor is engaged in inherently dangerous activities; (2) the duty is nondelegable due to public policy considerations
partners and joint ventures
vicariously liable for tortious conduct of another partner if committed in the SCOPE AND COURSE of the affairs of the partnership or joint venture
Automobile Owner vicarious liability
Generally not vicariously liable for tortious conduct ofa nother driving his automobile
Exceptions in some states: (1) family car doctrine used with owner’s express or implied permission, (2) permissive use w/ consent, (3) negligent entrustment (when owner is liable for own negligence in loaning car to the driver)