Minority Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is minority influence?

A

A form of social influence where members of the majority group change their beliefs or behaviours as a result of their exposure to a persuasive minority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do people identify with the majority?

A

To try and fit in with their opinions without careful scrutiny of the message.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why don’t people identity with the minority?

A

Minority influence creates a conversion process whereby, provided the minority adapt a consistent and committed approach, people scrutinise the message itself.
They want to understand why the minority hold this position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens when people convert to the minority position?

A

Tends to be deeper and longer lasting as people have internalised the minority’s point of view.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What must happen for minority influence to be effective?

A

Minorities must be…
Consistency
Commitment
Flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does consistency do?

A

If the minority are consistent, others come to reassess the situation and consider the issue more carefully.

There must be a reason why the minority takes the position it does and is sufficiently confident to maintain it over time and with each other (Nemeth, 2010).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Wood (1994) do?

A

Carried out a meta-analysis of 97 studies of minority influence, and found that minorities who were perceived as being especially consistent in expressing their position were actually particularly influential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does commitment do?

A

It suggests certainty, confidence and courage in the face of a hostile majority.
May persuade majority group members to take then seriously, or even convert to the majority position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is consistency?

A

Minority influence is effective provided there is stability in the expressed position over time and agreement among different members of the minority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is commitment?

A

The degree to which members of a minority are dedicated to a particular cause or activity.
The greater the perceived commitment, the greater the influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is flexibility?

A

A willingness to be flexible and to compromise when expressing a position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Mugny (1982) suggest?

A

That flexibility is more effective at changing majority opinion than rigidity of arguments.
Because minorities are typically powerless compared to the majority, they must negotiate their position with the majority rather than try to enforce it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s the problem with flexibility?

A

A rigid minority that refuses to compromise risks being perceived as dogmatic.
However, a minority that is too flexible and too prepared to compromise risks being seen as inconsistent.

Neither approach is particularity effective at persuading the majority to shift to the minority’s position, but some is better than none (Mugny).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What’s the key study for minority influence?

A

Moscovici (1969)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the procedure of Moscovici’s study?

A

Each group comprised 4 naive participants and a minority of 2 confederates.
They were shown a series of blue slides that varied only in intensity and were asked to judge the colour of each slide.

In the ‘consistent’ experimental condition, the 2 confederates repeatedly called the blue slides ‘green’ (they said green on every trial).

In the ‘inconsistent’ condition, the confederates called the slides ‘green’ on 2/3 of the trials, and on the remaining 1/3 of trials called the slides ‘blue’.

In a control condition, comprising 6 naive participants and no confederates, participants called the slides ‘blue throughout’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were the findings of Moscovici’s study?

A

The consistent minority influenced the naive participants to say ‘green’ on over 8% of the trials.

The inconsistent minority exerted very little influence, and did not differ significantly from the control group.

18
Q

What did Moscovici do after the main study was over?

A

Participants were asked individually to sort 16 coloured discs into either ‘blue’ or ‘green’.
3 of these discs were unambiguously from the blue end of the colour spectrum and 3 were unambiguously from the green end.

The remaining 10 discs were ambiguous in that they might be considered either blue or green. To be able to do this, participants had to establish a threshold point where everything one side of that point would then be ‘judged’ blue, and everything on the other side ‘green’.

19
Q

What did Moscovici find after the main study was over?

A

Individuals who had been in the consistent and inconsistent minority conditions set their thresholds at different points.

With the result that those in the consistent condition judged more of the chips to be green than those in the inconsistent condition.

This effect was even greater for those participants who hadn’t gone along with the minority during the experiment, suggesting that the initial influence was more at a private than public level.

20
Q

What are the evaluative points?

A
Research support for flexibility 
The real ‘value’ of minority influence 
Do we really process the minority’s message more
A ‘tipping point’ for commitment 
Minority influence in name only
21
Q

What is meant by research support for flexibility?

A

Nemeth and Brilmayer (1987) studied the role of flexibility in a stimulated jury situation where group members discussed the amount of compensation to be paid to someone involved in a ski-lift accident.

When a confederate put forward an alternative point of view and refused to change his position, this has no effect on other group members.
A confederate who compromised and therefore showed some degree of shift towards the majority did exert an influence on the rest of the group.

However, this was only evident in those who shifted late in negotiations (perceived as showing flexibility) rather than those who shifted earlier (perceived as having ‘caved in’ to the majority).

22
Q

What is meant by the real ‘value’ of minority influence?

A

Jfbdsjf

25
Q

What does dogmatic mean?

A

Narrow minded and refusing to consider other opinions may be justified