Mind Body Problem Flashcards
Problems with interactionist dualism (Descartes)
- interaction (pineal gland?) - how does something physical interact with something not physical?
- if consciousness defines us, why does high level processing take place subconsciously?
L> law of conservation of energy (Helmholtz) - in closed system, total amount of energy doesn’t change
Materialism and it’s problems
- no mind
- 1:1 correspondence between mind-brain
- consciousness = illusion or by-product - no causal effect if consciousness on our bodies
- free will = illusion
Problems: - identity problem: how possible to experience one event as the same, even if 2 brains differ in processing of info?
- qualia problem: how can our experience be based on materialistic interactions? - reduces experiences to purely materialistic function
Functionalism and it’s problems
- instantiations in which computations happen are unimportant - functional organisation is
- cognitive functions aren’t localised in brain
L> metaphor: if the raw material after teleportation is silicon instead of human wetware the same individual materialises - with the same identity, consciousness and free will -> as long as something functionally equivalent =same
Problems: - Chinese room - looking up symbols relate to doesn’t mean understand what is going on
- interaction with external world is through our bodies, determining our consciousness, interaction, learning etc - can’t take context away - cognition is embodied
Do we need consciousness for higher level processing? Eg. For vision
Sub-conscious processing can perform higher level cognitive functions in same way as conscious processes
- sub-conscious visual processing can be as efficient/reliable as conscious processing (for social signals)
Low special frequency representations passed onto prefrontal cortex/infero-temporal cortex to guess object: top-down info used to process stimulus at low level
- sub-conscious visual processing can drive guessing, which can drive further subconscious processing (for objects)
Global workspace model
Consciousness associated with integrating info: associative perceptual, motor, attention, memory, and evaluation areas - if all in sync = conscious of them
- Info processing involves numerous special purpose unconscious processors operating in parallel
- Consciousness associated with info integration late in processing
- Brain areas associated with consciousness may vary, but those involved with synchronising break activity = constant
- Close links between attention and consciousness
Multiple drafts model
No central stage where all info comes together - where the self observes the homunculus problem
No integrated unitary consciousness
No self
Many kinds of awareness/stories
Several interpretations about the outside world competing for further processing
One that wins is one we think we are conscious of
All info even if contradictory remains available
Cognitive v experiential consciousness
- access (cognitive) consciousness: info available in cognitive system for the purposes of reasoning, speech and high-level action control
- phenomenal (experiential) consciousness: subjective experience and feelings
Under report conscious experiences because phenomenal consciousness is much richer than access consciousness - 2 problems with consciousness:
1. Easy problem: how do we integrate info, access our own states, and make decisions?
2. Hard problem: how does phenomenal consciousness come about?
Descriptive experience sampling (DES) makes us conscious of subconscious processing -> 6 random moments in day hear a beep, describe what experiencing in high detail in that moment
- participant and researcher work on high-fidelity apprehension of each sampled moment of inner experience within 24 hours