Milgram's variations Flashcards

1
Q

What happened in Milgram’s Variation 10 (Rundown Office Block)?

A
  • study moved from Yale University to a run-down office building in Bridgeport.
  • was presented as being run by “Research Associates of Bridgeport”, with no official university link.
  • Procedure stayed the same — participant = “teacher”, confederate = “learner”, shocks given for wrong answers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were the results of Milgram’s Variation 10?

A
  • Obedience dropped to 47.5% (from 65% in the original).
  • Participants appeared more doubtful of the study’s legitimacy.
  • Some participants questioned whether the experimenter had authority to give orders.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What conclusions were drawn from Milgram’s Variation 10?

A
  • status and prestige of the setting affects obedience.
  • Without Yale’s authority, participants were less likely to obey.
  • Shows legitimacy of authority is an important factor.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happened in Milgram’s Variation 7 (Telephonic Instructions)?

A
  • experimenter gave orders over phone instead of being in the same room.
  • participant was still with the learner and shock machine.
  • All other procedures remained the same.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the results of Milgram’s Variation 7?

A
  • Obedience dropped sharply to 22.5%.
  • Many participants lied and said they were giving shocks when they weren’t.
  • Some participants disobeyed openly once the experimenter was out of sight.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What conclusions were drawn from Milgram’s Variation 7?

A
  • importance of proximity to authority.
  • When the experimenter isn’t physically present, it’s easier to resist authority.
  • Physical presence seems to increase pressure to obey.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened in Milgram’s Variation 13 (Ordinary Man)?

A
  • An “ordinary man” (confederate) gave the instructions to give shocks, not the experimenter.
  • experimenter left the room early.
  • man had no authority symbols (no lab coat or official title).
  • setup made it seem like the ordinary man was in charge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the results of Milgram’s Variation 13?

A
  • Obedience dropped to 20%.
  • Many participants were uncomfortable taking orders from someone without authority.
  • Some challenged the man’s right to give instructions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What conclusions were drawn from Milgram’s Variation 13?

A
  • perceived legitimacy of the authority figure is key to obedience.
  • People less likely to obey if authority figure appears ordinary or unofficial.
  • Authority must be seen as genuine and legitimate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly