Midterm1 Flashcards
What are the two types of norms that William Sumner describes, their features? Give an example of each?
1) Mores are norms that carry great importance in our lives. They are both strictly and observed, with there being strict social sanctions if they are broken. They are also often reinforced with formal laws. An example would be not committing incest
2) Folkways are the customs and social norms of everyday life, they carry lesser social sanctions. An example would be saying “please” and “thank you”.
What was Garfinkel’s contribution to sociology, and how was it reliant to deviance?
Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodological approach studied the methods and norms used to produce social order. He conducted Breaching experiments that would examine peoples reactions to the deviant violation of social norms.
Goffman offered a “Dramaturgical Analysis” in his sociological theorisation of how individuals present themselves in everyday life. What does this mean? Give examples.
Goffman described human interactions in terms of a theatre show. Through ‘impression management’ we aim to present ourselves in favourable ways.
For example, we ‘act’ through our gestures, postures and expressions, which in turn is affected by our ‘background decorations’- the settings we are in.
Goffman describes a number of locations and methods we present ourselves in. Elaborate
We act differently in ‘front stage’ interactions than we do in ‘back stage’, this is because in the former case our actions are visible to an ‘audience’ and act as part of the performance of our own identity. Backstage behaviours are less performative but still maintain a performative function; individuals have no other audience bar themselves for such behaviours.
There have been a number of historical approaches that attempt to explain the cause of deviance, what are they?
1) Theological (demonological) approaches
2) Classical Approaches
3) Biological Approaches
4) Psychological Approaches
5) Sociological Approaches
Around the 18th century, Classical approaches would start to supersede theological approaches. How did this change how deviant behaviour were perceived, as well as how they were punished. Discuss scholars in your answer.
Enlightenment era Classical thought moved away from the belief that people commit Deviant behaviours because they are possessed. The idea of criminal responsibility became more prevenlant as people were regarded as rational and fully in control and respnsible for their own behaviours (Beccaria, 1764). Sanctions thus no longer simply physical attempts to exorcise demons out of the perpetrator but where “swift, certain and severe” (Bentham) as to deter people from committing such acts.
Aspects of Classical approaches remain within “neo-classical” theory. Give an example of one such approach.
Routine Activity Theory (Cohen and Felson, 1979) is type of rational choice theory that claims that deviants reason their choices to commit crime, based on a motivated offender, an attractive target, and the absence of capable guardianship.
How do both theological and Classical theories of deviancy differ from the approaches that would supersede them?
Later theories would begin to move away from fatalistic/ Totalistic claims of their predecessors.
Give an example of Early biological positivist approaches to crime and explain it.
Phrenology, popularised by Frantz Joseph Gall, was a Criminal anthropological approach that argued that skull shape and size was an effective indicator of criminality.
In Lombroso’s (1876) ‘The Born Criminal’, he concludes that the inmates in Italian prisons display atavistic traits, which can be used to explain their criminal behaviour. What, how and why?
Atavisms refer to physiological traits which resemble earlier stages in human evolution, such as lower foreheads, thicker lips etc. He believed that earlier humans had a ‘less evolved morality’, individuals with apparent genetic throwbacks to less evolved traits would as such be more prone to express such deviant, primitive behaviour.
William Sheldon’s constitutional theories proposed that particular body types were predisposed to particular behaviours. What were the body types he described, their personality types and which one was more likely to commit acts of deviancy?
Endomorph – overweight with a large stomach. Tolerant and likes people.
Mesomorph – Athletic and muscular. Aggressive, competitive, fearless, and risk-taking.
Ectomorph – Thin and fragile. Long, slender, and delicate. Artistic and introverted.
Balanced type – average build, without any special traits
Sheldon believed that due to their body/personality types, mesomorphs were more likely to commit criminal acts.
There are 3 major explanations in modern biological theories of crime, what are they and give examples
1) Chemical Imbalance and Crime
Hypoglycemia – low blood sugar. e.g “Dan White, Harvey Milk and the Twinkie Defence”
2) Genetics and Crime
Criminal family trees
XYY Chromosome (The “Supermale Syndrome”)
Twin and Adoption Studies
3) Sociobiology (evolutionary psychology)
The Cinderella Hypothesis (Daly and Wilson)
Why Men Rape (Thornhill and Palmer)
What do Thornhill and Palmer find and conclude about ‘Why men rape’, and how does it differ from other sociological perspectives?
1) Most rape victims are young women
2) Most rape victims are not murdered after the act
3) Young women suffer more as a result of rape
4) Married women suffer more
Contrary to feminist thought, rape is not about power relations but instead about sexual desire. Rape is a natural evolutionary strategy that developed to enable less desirable men, such as those with lower status, to spread their genes when other more legitimate means are otherwise unenviable.
Thornhill and Palmer’s research and conclusions has been met with heavy criticism. Why and what is challenged?
1) Their account distorts feminist theory by claiming that it focus solely on power relations. While there is much emphasis on power relations in social explanatory models of rape, feminist theory does not dismiss sexual desire as a causal explanation.
2) Their data largely focuses on the victims and thus is unable to provide any actual evidence for genetic/psychological mechanism)
3) The studies were conducted by analysing non-human extrapolation from lower species rather than through analysing humans themselves. Not only does this make the findings themselves questionable, but it also greatly reduces the validity of claims that rape is universal.
4) Alternative explanations for the “findings”
5) While they claim that young women and married women suffer more trauma from rape due to it hindering there reproductive value, there findings intentional misrepresent their data. Over 44 year old’s experienced equal trauma to their younger counterparts but this was hidden through combining the category with under 12’s.
6) Dubious political recommendations act to blame the victim, claiming rape could be reduced if they dressed more modestly. Moreover, they are that men should be taught that rape is natural (but that they need to control their desires).
What is the Freudian structural model of Personality?
The Id – Basic Drives and needs (the Pleasure Principle)
The Ego – Restraining the demands of the Id and postponing gratification (the reality principle)
The Super-Ego – The internalization of societal values (consciences and morality)
What are the basic principles of the Freudian psycho-sexual theory of development?
People are largely driven by sexual drives
Erogenous zones – body parts that produce sexual pleasures
Fixation – getting stuck in one of the stages or moving on without solving the conflicts associated with the stage
The first years of life are crucial
What are the 5 stages within the Freudian psycho-sexual theory of development?
1) The Oral Stage (1-1.5)
2) The Anal Stage (2-3)
3) The Phallic Stage (4-6)
4) The Latency Stage (6-12)
5) The Genital Stage (12- )
What conflicts can occur without proper resolution of the Phallic stage?
The Oedipus Complex (castration anxiety)
The Electra Complex (penis envy)
Phallic Character
What are the critiques of Freudian theory?
1) Most of the assumptions are speculative and non-scientific (not falsifiable)
2) The theory is largely post-hoc
3) An assumption that women are incomplete people
4) Lack of sensitivity to cultural variations
5) No empirical support for the psycho-sexual theory and adult fixations
What does Eysenck state about Crime and personality?
Eysenck’s theory of criminal personality suggests that personality is biologically based and that personality traits include dimensions of extroversion, neuroticism psychoticism. Criminals and other deviants will often display heightened levels of at least one of these characteristics